Wildfire dxf file generation?

Discussion in 'Pro/Engineer & Creo Elements/Pro' started by CHale, Apr 17, 2004.

  1. CHale

    CHale Guest

    I need to take a .asm file created in Pro/E Wildfire and create a .dxf
    file of a specific view of the assembly, so I can then work with it in
    2D AutoCAD 14. My Pro/E 2000 friends at work are pretty sure they can
    do this (I started asking into this question about 1 minute before
    everybody was headed home for the weekend; bear with me!) by simply
    going to File>Save As> and save the file as a .dxf file. I don't seem
    to be seeing this file type as an option in Wildfire. Am I going
    blind, or...? Any suggestions would be appreciated, thank you--
    C. Hale
    Lafayette, CO
     
    CHale, Apr 17, 2004
    #1
  2. "Save as Copy"
     
    Paul Salvador, Apr 17, 2004
    #2
  3. (I just canceled my reply because I assumed you have a DRW of the ASM?)

    Anyhow, if you want to save the ASM out as a 2D DXF, you will have to
    create a DRW of your ASM, then you can Save as Copy, DXF.
    Otherwise, if you want to save out your ASM as 3D solids, Save as Copy,
    ACIS (*.sat)

    ...
     
    Paul Salvador, Apr 17, 2004
    #3
  4. CHale

    David Janes Guest

    : I need to take a .asm file created in Pro/E Wildfire and create a .dxf
    : file of a specific view of the assembly, so I can then work with it in
    : 2D AutoCAD 14. My Pro/E 2000 friends at work are pretty sure they can
    : do this (I started asking into this question about 1 minute before
    : everybody was headed home for the weekend; bear with me!) by simply
    : going to File>Save As> and save the file as a .dxf file. I don't seem
    : to be seeing this file type as an option in Wildfire. Am I going
    : blind, or...? Any suggestions would be appreciated, thank you--

    You've simply gone 'module' blind. Isn't dxf capable of representing 3D data, so
    that 3D AutoCAD can import it. If you need, as you say, 2D data, you need to
    export it from a 2D format. The only such thing in Pro/e is drawing mode. If you
    place an assembly view on a sheet of a drawing and export it to dxf, you should
    get the 2D data you need for ACAD.
    [rant, RAYOR]
    Gosh, this 3D to 2D to 3D crap is hard!!! In 7-10 years, there will be no 2D
    anywhere, Dead Man Walking... All you 2D curmudgeons, get over to 3D, or you'll be
    like that one lone board drafter at Caterpillar who loved his drafting board so
    much that he got it as a retirement present and still gets the occasional paper
    drawing to correct. Like the steam boiler railroad guys, who when their ranks
    thinned out, got to man the train museums. Great, for those of you who need a
    hobby, but certainly not as a way to make a living or run a corporation. The
    technology's moving very quickly ~ spend some money, you American capitalist
    cheapskates and try to keep up!! Or, hey, why not just send the money to someplace
    like India and buy the already highly sophisticated talent, trained in a place
    where they kept up, where they didn't go cheap on the training, like they did here
    in the 80s and 90s. Here, where even the 'bedrock' community college system
    withers. Which is the only thing left after they trashed all the apprenticeship
    programs. So, now we have highly trained intellectuals and theoreticians who can't
    DO anything, can't MAKE or BUILD anything and we have to get talent from India and
    China where they still follow the European model of first leaning to do and make
    and build, so that they know what the theory applies to. Bet they don't have to
    wrangle with a bunch of decripit 2D drafters in India!

    David Janes
     
    David Janes, Apr 17, 2004
    #4
  5. CHale

    hamei Guest

    David Janes wrote:


    I don't know anything about India, but China is nothing
    like you think it is .....
     
    hamei, Apr 17, 2004
    #5
  6. CHale

    CHale Guest

    I've <got> it!, thanks much to you all for the necessary info to get
    me off the ground on this topic. More in a minute. But first,...

    Oh man, David Janes, your "rant" cuts me to the core of my being, I am
    forced to admit. I am indeed a 2D curmudgeon, but I feel compelled to
    elaborate. (by the way, I enjoyed the total crap out of your response
    and read it out loud to my wife a while ago. She wondered "how long
    it took the guy to write that" and I told her, heck, probably about 5
    minutes; I write stuff like that all the time myself!! :)

    I'm just starting to learn Wildfire (duh). I've some time ago
    completely thrown up my hands at Pro/E 2000, which is the primary
    platform that the serious ME Dept. guys use at my company. They got
    hold of a copy of Wildfire and told me, "here Charley, this is
    supposed to be a lot more friendly and bone-headed, knock yourself
    out". (they, in turn, are currently shaking in their boots at the
    prospect of shifting entirely to Wildfire in the coming years. ha!!).
    I'm 16+ years into a career at a laser/laser radar R&D company that
    had ~ 8 people when I started in 1987, and is now sitting at about 215
    people. When I started in '87, I was one of three guys (one PhD
    physicist and two BS physics geeks, me being one of them) who "did it
    all", including mechanical (that's manual) drafting of any and all
    widgets and (mostly fairly modest back then) assemblies necessary to
    do our earliest of early R&D and prototyping. A couple years later, I
    was the first person at the co. to bring in a copy of ACAD9, I think
    it was, then 10 for a number of years. Soon the core of the design
    guys, still no "real MEs" yet, were doing everything in ACAD10, 2D. I
    got REALLY good at it, by the way; still had a lot of design work to
    do back then, etc. Then we really started growing and hired a real ME
    or two, who got us going with 3D non-parametric ACAD10 and then Pro/E.
    I was later the first guy to get hold of a copy of SolidWorks, which
    lots of R&D guys snagged onto, me included. But as the co. grew, my
    level of responsibility for real "in the trenches" mech and optomech
    design waned as I became more of a "systems engineer" (my life at the
    co. has been comprised of being a "fake" engineer of one sort or
    another, until we grow enough to hire some real ones! I'll let the
    reader conclude that that says about me, I'm frankly not sure...).
    Thus, I've never really been on the hook for an end-to-end instrument
    design in the 3D world to date, and predictably enough I've found
    myself too busy and/or lazy to sit down after hours and pound out some
    decent expertise. But anyhow, I still need, and very definitely want
    and love, to continue to have my hand in the hardw design of the
    things we do, and am using my rudimentary Wildfire skills to permit me
    to navigate around in the design guys' monstrous Pro/E2002 assembly
    files. As you so adroitly picked up on, I'm often inclined to get
    hold of dxf files of the assemblies and fire up ACAD14 (I've got
    2000/2, too, but just don't like them as much as 14--is THAT
    curmudgeonly for you or what?!? :) and go in and REALLY QUICKLY design
    in new stuff that I then hand over to the ME's again, who sigh and
    moan and design it on into the real model...so that's my CAD story in
    a nutshell. This weekend for whatever reason, I've decided I need to
    figure out how to make my own damn dxf's instead of hassling my poor
    MEs. I'm a Dead Man Walking all right (that's good, really good),
    but, I'm holing up in the prison law library and trying to get my case
    re-tried...seriously!

    Your comments about loss of training and skills at the community
    college level and such are right-on, and I have very similar
    sentiments, believe me. I'm a serious-level home machinist in my
    off-time (two lathes, one of them a magnificent 1947 Hardinge toolroom
    lathe, two mills, surface grinder, etc.). I have family connections
    to such manic activities, but, I also decided a long time ago that I
    wasn't going to be able to design anything worth a shit if I didn't
    actually know how to <make> it; and so it goes. I find myself pretty
    aghast at how little of that sort of experience incoming MEs can
    arrive with fresh from school; I know plenty of ME youngsters who <do>
    know their stuff very well too, no problem, but it seems it always
    took specific initiative on their parts to seek out that machining
    experience and the necessary hands-on foundation to really design
    well.

    So all that said (you guys who really belong here are well into "who
    the HELL is this yahoo anyhow??!", I do appreciate--ha),

    Should any other Wildfire neophytes and/or 2D curmudgeons find their
    way to this message, I herewith provide my recipe for obtaining the
    damnable dxf in damnable ACAD14:

    In .asm file,
    Reorient View menu; Saved Views; Name: "test", say; Set; Save; OK.
    File: New: Drawing; "test.drw", say.
    "Empty with Format"; Browse; c.frm (e.g.); OK.
    "Insert Drawing View"; Done; click a center point in the drawing area;
    Select "test" Saved View; Set; OK.
    Save As: "test.dxf" (praises be)
    Open damnable ACAD14 and do the dirty deed.

    Cheers,
    Charley Hale
    Lafayette CO
     
    CHale, Apr 17, 2004
    #6
  7. CHale

    CHale Guest

    By the way, that was ACAD12 for the 3D wireframe stuff way back when,
    not 10, for all you ACAD history wonks out there. OK, now I'm done,
    have a good weekend--C. Hale
     
    CHale, Apr 18, 2004
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.