Wide Format 16x10 Aspect Ratio Monitor versus Standard 4x3

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by Niko, Sep 14, 2005.

  1. Niko

    Niko Guest

    I'm processing monitor info for my next purchase. I see the Dell 2005FPW
    and it's wide format, but never used one like this. In a 20" size, are
    there any opinions as to this format's acceptability (or lack thereof..)
    as compared to the standard 4x3 format? Thanks for your thoughts

    Nick Chirikos
    Housewright Design-Build Ltd.
     
    Niko, Sep 14, 2005
    #1
  2. Niko

    cadcoke3 Guest

    I've been thinking about this issue as well. I think for CAD the
    issue is the type of things you draw. I used to work for a company
    that made the mobile conveyors that airlines used to load luggage into
    an airplane. These vehicles were significantly longer than they were
    wide or tall. In this instance the wide format would be very useful.

    Now, the company I work for makes theatrical sets, which are
    generally more square in their aspect ratio. So, wide format would
    not be a benefit.

    Finally, the aspect ratio of paper sized 11x17, 17x22, 22x34, etc is
    very close to the 4x3 aspect ratio when used in landscape
    orientation... so I think that is a major factor for everyone.

    Joe Dunfee
     
    cadcoke3, Sep 15, 2005
    #2
  3. Niko

    cadcoke3 Guest

    I had another thought. When looking at wide-format LCD's vs. the
    4x3, for the comparable horizontal resolutions (and prices), the wide
    format versions just OMIT pixels vertically. So, in choosing a 4x3 you
    get more total pixels to use. So, there is no advantage to looking for
    wide format in this way of looking at things.

    Joe Dunfee
     
    cadcoke3, Sep 15, 2005
    #3
  4. Niko

    Niko Guest

    I like your observation comparing paper sizes to the screen size. They
    relate directly to each other, so I did the math, dividing the height by
    the width for both screens and four paper sizes

    Screens:
    Size Ratio
    10 : 16 .6250
    3 : 4 .7500

    Paper:
    11 x 17 .6471
    18 x 24 .7500
    24 x 36 .6667
    36 x 48 .7500

    Then divided the screen ratios by the paper ratios, and arranged the
    results by proportion.

    ..7500/.7500 1.000 (18x24 or 36x48 on 4:3)
    ..6250/.6471 .9659 (11x17 on 16:10)
    ..6250/.6667 .9375 (24x36 on 16:10)
    ..7500/.6667 1.125 (24x36 on 4:3)
    ..7500/.6471 1.159 (11x17 on 4:3)
    ..6250/.7500 .8334 (18x24 or 36x48 on 16:10)

    I do mostly 2D architectural on 24x36 and 11x17, so it looks like the
    wide aspect would be fine for me (if my math is correct...)
    Nick C







    ..
     
    Niko, Sep 15, 2005
    #4
  5. Niko

    veg Guest

    and dont forget as with the dell 24" wuxga screen you can turn it 90 degrees
    to a portrate ratio
     
    veg, Sep 16, 2005
    #5
  6. Niko

    Niko Guest

    Thanks for your input. I've ordered the Dell 2005. I'll post my
    observations after I've had a chance to get familiar with it.

    Nick
     
    Niko, Sep 16, 2005
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.