Which PDM system?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Ronni, Apr 22, 2008.

  1. Ronni

    Ronni Guest

    We are currently looking at some different PDM systems and would like
    to know which people are using and how satisfied they are with them.
    (Looking at SmartTeam, PDM Works Enterprise, PDM Works and Meridian
    atm).

    So feel free to comment on this just in short if you dont have a lot
    of time..

    PDM system
    Seats / Licenses
    Version of SW you are using
    Adresses you are using it on
    How satisfied are you with it on a scale form 1-10 where 10 is the
    best
    Your comments like if it took a lot of hours setting it up, if it
    dosnt update with SW versions of whatever good or bad you would like
    to add.

    Thanks in advance, it will help me a lot in getting an overview of
    pros and cons between the different PDM systems.
     
    Ronni, Apr 22, 2008
    #1
  2. Ronni

    jon.banquer Guest

    As soon as I find a link to copy and paste, I will post it here.

    Jon Banquer
    Oceanside, CA
     
    jon.banquer, Apr 22, 2008
    #2
  3. Ronni

    pfarnham Guest

    Steer clear of Pdmworks, some major bugs and no cure still, from 2007.

    Don't get me wrong, I actually like Pdmworks, lol

    1,
    But when trying to get a picture in document information, the assembly
    is partially exploded, even though there no exploded configurations in
    the assembly.

    2,
    Actual information that you can extract is minuscule.

    3,
     
    pfarnham, Apr 22, 2008
    #3
  4. It sounds like the first thing you need to do is determine what you
    needs are. If you are comparing SmarTeam, PDMWorks Enterprise and
    PDMWorks Workgroup (I don’t know anything about Meridian) you are
    taking the wrong approach. While these systems share some
    similarities they way more different than they are alike.

    If you want to do simple SolidWorks file management in a single
    geographic location then Workgroup is probably best.

    If in addition to SolidWorks file s you need to manage AutoCAD and/or
    Inventor and/or Solid Edge, if you have PDM contributors distributed
    geographically, if you need medium complexity document-centric process
    management then Enterprise is probably a good choice.

    If you want to do full PLM including CAD file management for many
    different CAD packages, process-centric workflows, bill of material
    management, MS-Project integration, bi-directional ERP integration,
    heavy customization via an API or supplier/customer collaboration then
    SmarTeam (or a similar mid-range PLM product) is probably your best
    choice.

    With SmarTeam you can expect the implementation services to be near
    the cost of the product. With Workgroup there is very little
    consulting services required.

    I think you have the cart before the horse. When I get asked
    questions like this I always use the analogy you don’t go out and test
    drive a full size Chevy Truck and a 53 foot Kenworth tractor trailer
    do you? Of course not. First you determine your needs (do I need to
    go to Home Depot every once in a while or am I starting a moving
    business), your budget (do I have a problem that’s worth a $30K fix or
    a problem worth a $300K fix) and your tolerance for complexity (it a
    lot easier to drive and find a parking space for a Chevy truck but if
    I’m trying to move a whole house worth of stuff the multiple trips
    will get old real soon or I can fit everything I ever wanted from Home
    Depot in one load if I get a Kenworth but for the few occasions that a
    Chevy truck won’t be big enough it will sure be a pain to drive that
    thing and pay for the fuel when in most cases I am just commuting 10
    miles in city traffic to my job).

    Give us a little more information on what problem(s) you are trying to
    solve and I'd be happy to offer, from my PLM consultant's prospective,
    my opinion on what product would be best.

    Derek Neiding
    www.razorleaf.com
     
    derek.neiding, Apr 22, 2008
    #4
  5. Ronni

    pfarnham Guest

     
    pfarnham, Apr 22, 2008
    #5
  6. Ronni

    Jean Marc Guest

    <> a écrit

    Give us a little more information on what problem(s) you are trying to
    solve and I'd be happy to offer, from my PLM consultant's prospective,
    my opinion on what product would be best.

    Derek Neiding
    www.razorleaf.com

    As I am still waiting for a VAR to answer my needs, I will take your offer:



    I need (most important first):



    1- A central point for storing files, with ownership/ rights management, and
    "smart" way of managing the loading of files on client machines (not copying
    files that are the same,)



    2- A way of checking a minimum number of information (custom props) before
    validating a file (entering the vault).



    3- Creating an image of the file for third party consultation with a light
    client (just Firefox and acrobat, no HD, Wi-Fi connection). Now its *.pdf
    files (preferred, could be edrawings)



    4- "Advanced" search (nice if it could be better than search on text string
    we have now)



    5- Could (/should?) have been first: VERY light to operate on an everyday
    basis. The best would be that no one notices it's there if things are done
    right.





    No BOM management, no life cycle management, no workflow management
    necessary



    Thank you very much in advance

    JM
     
    Jean Marc, Apr 23, 2008
    #6
  7. Ronni

    JP Guest

    I'm curious about this as well and my company's needs are very similar
    to Jean Marc's.

    My company adopted SolidWorks pretty early on (SW97, IIRC), so at the
    time, the PDM options were quite limited. We went with SmarTeam and
    have struggled with it ever since. SmarTeam has shown to be very user
    unfriendly and quite expensive for our basic CAD vault needs.
    Compounding the problems, until I recently took on the role of CAD
    Administrator, we haven't had any dedicated administration on the
    system, so we're currently quite far from running smoothly.

    With the system in the state it is, I'm seriously considering
    migrating to another PDM system as the cost to fix SmarTeam may very
    well be higher than going to a "simpler" system.

    The only thing I would add as our needs that Jean Marc didn't mention
    is that we would need as much support for part and assembly
    configurations as possible.

    Thanks,
    Jason
     
    JP, Apr 23, 2008
    #7
  8. Ronni

    Jean Marc Guest

    I'm glad I'm not alone in what I see as a non-nonsense basic need for
    information distribution. And moreover, that someone understands my English
    ;=}}}

    Anyway, I got an answer from my VAR, and he says PDMWorks Workroup will fit
    the bill.

    Any opinions?

    TIA
    JM
     
    Jean Marc, Apr 24, 2008
    #8
  9. Ronni

    That70sTick Guest

    I worked on an implementation of Meridian at a previous employer. We
    had 6 SW users in a division of about 80 people. It worked well.
    It's a good system for handling other docs (estimates, test requests,
    quotes). It also handled SW files well enough to suit our needs.
     
    That70sTick, Apr 24, 2008
    #9
  10. Ronni

    Ronni Guest

    Thanks for the feedback keep it coming :)

    I have tried PDM Works Enterprise for about a month on just one
    machine and it was easy to use out of the box, but also clearly showed
    that it will take some hours to make it work. And the second you get
    your files into the vault they are pretty much hostages there in case
    it goes bad you depent extremely much on the support you get (where
    hot-fixes now aint happening anymore since Dassault took over Conisio/
    PDMW Enterprise, now you need to wait for service packs).

    At first we ruled out the smallest version the PDMWorks Workgroup, but
    also I have talked with several users (and visited them to see it in
    use) that uses PDM Works Enterprise, and they are all saying that it
    has some flaws and they are looking at the smaller version (WorkGroup)
    because of the lack of support. The biggest flaw I see with WorkGroup
    is, that it aint keeping 100% control of the ownership, so you still
    have to make some procedures to how to check in and out (which of
    course can be done, the prize difference makes up for a lot of time/
    playroom to make alternatives)

    We have ~25 licences, and we are often working with 4-5 people on the
    same project, same assemblies etc, so we need to be able to easy
    switch ownership without having to make a full reload.

    How is the interface from Meridian handled? Do you use it in a browser
    or is there an add-in for SW to use it "inside" the program? (Right
    click files to open, changing states, taking ownership etc.)
     
    Ronni, Apr 25, 2008
    #10
  11. Ronni

    TOP Guest

    I am partial to dbWorks. It takes a bit of work to set up, but it is
    very capable and well supported.

    TOP
     
    TOP, Apr 26, 2008
    #11
  12. Ronni

    harry Guest

    DBWorks has a workgroup version that runs on a database, (which is the same
    product as their Enterprise version) which is very compitative price wise
    with PDMworks.. You should get demo's of all of them and see which one fits
    you best....
     
    harry, Apr 30, 2008
    #12
  13. Ronni

    Ronni Guest

    Sounds good, do you know an european english talking reseller where I
    can try the demo from?

    Thanks for responses keep them coming :-D
     
    Ronni, Apr 30, 2008
    #13
  14. Ronni

    harry Guest

    If you go to the Mechworks web page (www.mechworks.com) you can down load
    it to try and also find a reseller..
     
    harry, May 1, 2008
    #14
  15. Ronni

    Ronni Guest

    Thx Harry

    I am looking into it.

    (bump)
     
    Ronni, May 13, 2008
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.