What is the meaning of antenna error in a layout???

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by o.aubreton, Oct 29, 2003.

  1. o.aubreton

    o.aubreton Guest

    Hello,

    I am designing a CMOS circuit using AMS CMOS 0.35 (C35B4) library with
    the Cadence IC 4.46 software.

    I submitted the design to the foundry and it reported me an "antenna"
    error. What is the meaning of this error?

    When I click on the marker and ask for explanations, I get the following
    message:

    Location: ("LibraryName" "CircuitName" "Layout")
    reason: ANT_MET3_GATE_AR3

    Can anyone explain me what is the meaning of this message?

    Many thanks for your reply.

    Best regards


    Lew
     
    o.aubreton, Oct 29, 2003
    #1
  2. o.aubreton

    S. Badel Guest

    it's when you have large metal structures connected to the
    gate of a mos transistor.

    as those are not connected to the bulk, they can collect
    large amounts of electric charges during etching, and
    eventually cause breakdown of the gate oxide, thus
    damaging the transistor.

    take a look at http://www.national.com/quality/antenna_ratio_wp.html
    for a detailled description.

    there are techniques for avoiding antenna effect. for example
    jumping to met2 then back to met1 to have a smaller
    met1 path connected to the gate.


    stephane
     
    S. Badel, Oct 29, 2003
    #2
  3. o.aubreton

    Partha Guest

    From the net,


    Failure Mechanism
    Modern fabrication flows use plasma etching as an integral part of
    some process steps. The plasma etching systems create and sustain an
    energized and highly ionized state of matter in order to etch or
    deposit layers onto silicon wafers. As a result of this exposure,
    charges can build up on circuit areas. Ion implant equipment can also
    cause charge build up. Uncontrolled discharge of these charges may
    cause permanent physical damage to the physical structures on the
    device, e.g., transistor gate oxide.

    'Antenna' and 'Antenna Ratio'
    The propensity for damage to the circuitry on a wafer can be
    exacerbated by the existence of 'antenna' structures. The 'antenna' is
    an interconnect, i.e., a conductor like polysilicon or metal, that is
    not electrically connected to silicon, i.e., not 'grounded', during
    the processing steps of the wafer. The connection to silicon would
    normally provide an electrical path to bleed-off any accumulated
    charges. If the connection to silicon does not exist, charges and may
    build up on the interconnect to the point at which rapid discharge
    does take place and permanent physical damage results, e.g., to MOSFET
    gate oxides. This destructive phenomenon is known as the 'antenna
    effect'.

    The 'antenna ratio' of an interconnect is used to predict if the
    antenna effect will occur. 'Antenna ratio' is defined as the ratio
    between the physical area of the conductors making up the antenna to
    the total gate oxide area to which the antenna is electrically
    connected. A higher ratio implies a greater propensity to fail due to
    the antenna effect. This can result either from a relatively larger
    area to collect charge or a reduced gate oxide area on which the
    charge is concentrated
     
    Partha, Oct 29, 2003
    #3
  4. o.aubreton

    Ronald Guest

    Partha explained it well (I think he is a cad guy). Let me add a few
    comments....

    Four - five years ago TSMC adds antenna checks on its 0.18 flow.
    Newer technologies (0.13, 0.9) certainly have these antenna checks
    because they have smaller gate size.

    Summary:
    - long uniterrupted metal is bad
    - bigger diffusion is good
    - bigger gate is good

    If physical verification (Assura, Calibre) shows the antenna flags,
    you need to address them..... If this is custom layout, you need to
    fix it manually. If the layout is generated from P&R flow, you need
    to modify the flow (Silicon Ensemble, for example, requires antenna
    LEF rules, antenna information on standard cells, and turning on a few
    SE environment)....

    Most foundry will not accept these violations.... You might want to
    verify the design before sending them to the foundry.

    thanks,
    ronald
     
    Ronald, Nov 5, 2003
    #4
  5. o.aubreton

    Ethan Dawe Guest

    Ethan Dawe, Nov 7, 2003
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.