Was there a fundamental difference between 0.35u and 0.18u ?

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by kamesh, Nov 14, 2006.

  1. kamesh

    kamesh Guest

    Hi all,

    I read a statement and I quote "There is a reason to believe that
    newer processes will tend to develop in the same direction as for 0.18u
    compared to the older 0.35u". This has brought me to this question was
    there a fundamental difference between 0.35u and 0.18u ? if yes what
    was it ?

    Thanks and Regards,
    Kamesh.
     
    kamesh, Nov 14, 2006
    #1
  2. kamesh

    Svenn Are Bjerkem Guest

    Is it possible to read the original text in a publication somewhere, or
    is this something a representative for a foundry has stated? Just
    curious because I also hear lots of statements about 0.18um being such
    a good workhorse tech for analog. (digital is always smallest features
    possible).
     
    Svenn Are Bjerkem, Nov 15, 2006
    #2
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. What is the potential difference between HSPICE and Spectre ?

  2. difference between fingers and multiplicity in simulation

  3. Whats the difference in between ICFB 4.46 and 5.0.32 ??

  4. Strange! What's the difference between core utilization ratio and core row utilization ratio?

  5. difference between an instance terminal, terminal, pin, and instance pin?

  6. Is there any difference between virtuoso and virtuoso XL?

  7. Difference between dbCreatePin and leCreatePin

  8. I was told there is a macro out there that...

Loading...