Virtuoso ruler resolution

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by AxisIC, Jun 18, 2008.

  1. AxisIC

    AxisIC Guest

    Does anyone out there know how to control the ruler resolution?
    Currently I have 4 decimal places, I would like to change to 3, as my
    DB is set to 0.001 resolution. Thanx in advance! ( 4 makes no sense at
    all. )
     
    AxisIC, Jun 18, 2008
    #1
  2. It appears (from a quick experiment) to have a resolution of a tenth of whatever
    the snap spacing is. I don't think you can control it independently of the snap
    spacing. This extra digit is probably a bit unnecessary.

    Regards,

    Andrew.
     
    Andrew Beckett, Jun 18, 2008
    #2
  3. AxisIC

    AxisIC Guest

    Andrew,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I work on XXnm designs, After a little looking around it has to do
    with All Angle & Diagonal measurements.(the 4th bit does get used)
    Here is the issue, When I measure somthing to be 99nm I see 0.0990 ,
    (that would be the pico spot)
    With drawing on 0.001 grid, the resolution is KILLER. I have to
    measure everything!! The trailing 0 can be misleading.
    (ie: was that 29nm or 290nm ?)
    Maybe I could get a good skill hack to determine if orthogonal mode,
    just use 3 digits to the right.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Thanxs in advance
    Colin
     
    AxisIC, Jun 18, 2008
    #3
  4. Unfortunately the rulers aren't customizable with SKILL, as far as I know.

    You could potentially use things like DRD to make it a bit less necessary to
    measure everything, I guess. Or some people use an artificially larger grid to
    make it easier to lay out - the loss of area is generally small compared with
    the time it takes to lay it out!

    Andrew.
     
    Andrew Beckett, Jun 20, 2008
    #4
  5. AxisIC

    S. Badel Guest

    S. Badel, Jun 20, 2008
    #5
  6. AxisIC

    AxisIC Guest

    Stephane,
    Thanks, we've had the grid under control for sometime now.
    We truly are drawing & measuring on a 0.001 unit. Changing the user
    units/DB units would be unacceptable.
    Dropping the trailing 0 on the ruler is just a pain. ( numbers like
    18nm 26nm 47nm ect....)
    I'll look elsewhere for a solution.
    Colin
     
    AxisIC, Jun 20, 2008
    #6
  7. AxisIC

    S. Badel Guest

    Stephane,
    Just something that came to me... You could draw 1000x larger. So you would get 18.0 or 47.0 which
    is less confusing... Basically change the user unit from um to nm.

    Good luck,
    Stéphane
     
    S. Badel, Jun 20, 2008
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.