Use of Component Name in SW BOM (2004)

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Len K. Mar, Dec 24, 2003.

  1. Len K. Mar

    Len K. Mar Guest

    Season Greetings!

    I've got a potential client who has some specific documentation
    requirements.
    They produce radios which require the documentation of the PCB & all
    its compoents. They are considering switching to SW and would like the
    following functionality.

    A third part application generates a SW assembly and all its
    components.The program assigns each part with a component name. i.e.
    Three resistors are named R1,R2,R3.

    What they would like to do is generate a ballooned drawing that

    1. Places the reference designator (R1, R2, R3) in the bottom half of
    a split balloon.

    2. Have a separate BOM column called REFDES (Reference Designator)
    which is populated by the component name (R1, R2, R3, IC-1, IC-2, U1,
    etc...

    I've looked at the BOM table API (cursory) and tried to modifiy it
    using available features. However, it appears the only direct
    customizatin to a SW BOM is to use a custom property.

    This is impractical as each assembly may use the same resistor file
    and the conversion program will designate each one differently.

    I know enough about SW API to designate myself as a danger to others.

    Any suggestion on how I might proceed with solving this problem?

    Cheers and Happy Holidays!

    Len
     
    Len K. Mar, Dec 24, 2003
    #1
  2. Len K. Mar

    Bates, Nigel Guest

    have you looked at circuitworks?, Ive been running this for several
    years now and have a good 'footprint' library which we use to import
    pcad IDF files to grow SW assemblies. Through circuitworks you can
    import all ECAD attributes R1,R2... which should then be more manageble
    thro' SW. As for refdes in the lower balloon half...Ill have a look in
    a bit and see if I have any ideas.
    cheeers
    nigel

    -----Original Message-----
    From: (Len K. Mar) [mailto:]
    Posted At: 24 December 2003 05:58
    Posted To: solidworks
    Conversation: Use of Component Name in SW BOM (2004)
    Subject: Use of Component Name in SW BOM (2004)


    Season Greetings!

    I've got a potential client who has some specific documentation
    requirements.
    They produce radios which require the documentation of the PCB & all
    its compoents. They are considering switching to SW and would like the
    following functionality.

    A third part application generates a SW assembly and all its
    components.The program assigns each part with a component name. i.e.
    Three resistors are named R1,R2,R3.

    What they would like to do is generate a ballooned drawing that

    1. Places the reference designator (R1, R2, R3) in the bottom half of
    a split balloon.

    2. Have a separate BOM column called REFDES (Reference Designator)
    which is populated by the component name (R1, R2, R3, IC-1, IC-2, U1,
    etc...

    I've looked at the BOM table API (cursory) and tried to modifiy it
    using available features. However, it appears the only direct
    customizatin to a SW BOM is to use a custom property.

    This is impractical as each assembly may use the same resistor file
    and the conversion program will designate each one differently.

    I know enough about SW API to designate myself as a danger to others.

    Any suggestion on how I might proceed with solving this problem?

    Cheers and Happy Holidays!

    Len
     
    Bates, Nigel, Dec 24, 2003
    #2
  3. Len K. Mar

    Jeff N Guest

    Nigel,

    If I may ask, did you evaluate alternative programs for importing PC boards
    into SolidWorks before buying CircuitWorks? We use Protel here and I haven't
    figured out which one would fit our needs best.
     
    Jeff N, Dec 24, 2003
    #3
  4. Len K. Mar

    Len K. Mar Guest

    Jeff,

    Several other clients I have use Desktop EDA. They are also using
    Protel (most 99SE but a few are making the switch to DXP).

    I evaluated both programs 2 years ago and settled with Desktop EDA -
    not much difference in functionality but a significant additional cost
    for circuitworks.
    Desktop EDA's new IDF version for SW now has the same functions as its
    integrated Prote/SW version. I've even beem able tp get it to play
    nice with DBWorks without much effort.

    Cheers,

    Len





     
    Len K. Mar, Dec 24, 2003
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.