tubes and cosmos analysis

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by henrik.johannisson, Feb 22, 2008.

  1. I have a working process kind of problem - I know what to do but don't
    know the best way to do it.

    I'm creating a tubular space frame and using SolidWorks 2007 for
    drawing/editing/viewing the space frame but would also like to do a
    very simple FEM analysis (possible through COSMOSXpress I assume) on
    the entire space frame.

    Regarding FEM, I'm not interested in absolute values or maximum load
    or similar - only interested in an analysis which can point out weak
    areas in the construction that need attention.


    Today I have a rough 3D sketch.

    Next step was to convert each line into a tube by using Structural
    Member from the Weldments toolbar.

    But what's next step? How do I go proceed from here?
     
    henrik.johannisson, Feb 22, 2008
    #1
  2. henrik.johannisson

    TOP Guest

    Forget CosmosExpress for something like this. Although the analysis of
    frames is typically given as a college level programming exercise
    because beam elements are among the simplest to program, this
    functionality has been missing from SW from the beginning. Cosmos/M
    can handle beam elements which makes it far quicker than SW when
    doing this sort of problem.

    TOP
     
    TOP, Feb 23, 2008
    #2
  3. henrik.johannisson

    post Guest

    TOP is correct, you'd need to use beam elements --
    which Xpress does not have.

    For a quick/dirty analysis with the tools you do have, you
    might model your frame with solid rounds -- and not tubes.

    The stress results from this would of course be totally
    meaningless but you may gain some insight from the
    displacements -- ie where your structure might benefit
    from gusseting, etc.

    Be careful of sharp inside corners -- which stinks because
    1) a weldment will have lots of these and 2) thats where
    your gussets would be. Use some "engineering sense"
    and try to guess where the critical points are likely to
    be. Fillet these joints with a radius at least equal to
    your intended wall thickness.

    Try to run as fine a mesh as your machine will handle
    (don't know how much control Xpress gives you here
    either).

    Finally, you'll have no buckling information -- so keep
    an eye out where tubes meet at a "T" or where the
    displacement analysis bends them significantly from
    compressive forces.

    Far from ideal -- but again, may give you some insight.

    -Tony
     
    post, Feb 23, 2008
    #3
  4. henrik.johannisson

    bmw-slangen Guest

    Thanks for all input.

    So what I hear is that COSMOSXpress can't handle my structure. Í have
    no problem
    using solid rounds for my model - but as I'm sort of a beginner I'm
    not sure how
    much extra work that will mean (and how do I practically do it -
    sounds like little
    bit more work than using a simple 3D sketch).

    Don't know if COSMOSWorks is available for me, will check.

    Any possibility to export the endpoints of the 3D sketch to another
    program
    where simple analysis can be carried out? I find it easy to design and
    change
    the 3D sketch (and later stage add other elements) in SolidWorks but
    what I
    hear is there is no simple way to do any kind of load analysis (not
    even the
    very simplest ones).
     
    bmw-slangen, Feb 23, 2008
    #4
  5. henrik.johannisson

    TOP Guest

    Tony,

    Actually, I hadn't thought of this solution. If Hendrick is after
    deflections what he might do is this:

    1. Calculate the moment of inertia of the tube.
    2. Back calculate the diameter of solid bar that has the same moment
    of inertia.
    3. Use SW weldment functionality to build the space frame from solid
    bars.
    4. It just might be possible to run this in CosmosExpress for global
    deflections and hot spots if Hendrik can get the boundary conditions
    right. St. Venant and some long thin members might come in handy
    there. There will be a lot of elements in any event. The stresses
    won't be right because c/I will be too low. You might be able to
    factor that up to get the stress in your tube though.

    TOP
     
    TOP, Feb 23, 2008
    #5
  6. henrik.johannisson

    post Guest

    Whats everyone doing up so early?

    Top, I'd have to give that some thought but working backwards
    may get him (her) into the 20-30% range (error, that is). I guess
    it boils down to just how big his model is and how "approximate"
    is "approximate".

    Hendrik/BMW -- the easiest way to model this is to still use
    the weldments feature. You can edit the 'profile templates'
    (don't remember what they're really called). Find the template
    for the tubing size you want -- open & edit -- delete the inside
    circle (tube ID) and save it as a new template (Solid_Round_XXmm)
    in the same directory as the other templates.

    When you pull up the weldment feature, you'll have a new
    profile in there -- the solid round you just saved.

    Be sure to clean up the ends where 3 or more members meet
    up as you may have some sharp corners that Xpress definintely
    won't like.

    -Tony
     
    post, Feb 23, 2008
    #6
  7. henrik.johannisson

    TOP Guest

    It Hendrik is doing the space frame then I wouldn't be too concerned
    about the corners except qualitatively. If it is a vehicular space
    frame it is going to be plenty strong. The concern will be where the
    plastic hinges will form when in a crash and in rigidity which is
    calculated from loads and deflections. If a particular corner looks to
    be a problem then model just that connection with appropriate loads.
    Unfortunately pulling those loads off of CosmosXpress will be a
    problem.

    TOP
     
    TOP, Feb 24, 2008
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.