Trailing zeros

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by alphawave, Jun 16, 2008.

  1. alphawave

    alphawave Guest

    I know i'm probably being dim today but.......

    I would like to dimension a drawing using a tolerance table in the
    title block as follows:

    No Decimal Places +/- 1
    1 Decimal Place +/- 0.5
    2 Decimal Places +/- 0.1
    3 Decimal Places +/- 0.01

    The thing I need to do is be able to force individual dimensions to
    have different numbers of trailing zeros

    How do I do this

    Thanks,

    Kev
     
    alphawave, Jun 16, 2008
    #1
  2. alphawave

    That70sTick Guest

    Tools --> Options --> Document options --> Detailing
    Find "Training zeroes", in the "Dimensioning Standard" block.
     
    That70sTick, Jun 16, 2008
    #2
  3. alphawave

    Cliff Guest

    This sort of "tolerancing" should never have been "invented".
     
    Cliff, Jun 16, 2008
    #3
  4. alphawave

    j Guest

    I think you want to look for TRAILING ZEROES and then you set your
    precision of each dimension according to what you would need for
    tolerances. Although ISO standards usually doesn't require the trailing
    zero but what are standards if we can't come up with what works for us.
     
    j, Jun 16, 2008
    #4
  5. alphawave

    Cliff Guest

    How do you tell 1.0 +/- .5 from 1.000 +/- .0005 with 1.000?
    Not to mention all the other errors when/if someone tries to
    build a model from those dimensions?
    And consider what happens to the nominal ...
     
    Cliff, Jun 16, 2008
    #5
  6. alphawave

    fcsuper Guest

    Cliff,

    According to ASME Y14.5M-1994, 1.0 is the same as 1.00 is the same as
    1.000, 1.0000, 1.000000000000000000000000000000 etc. The nominal is
    unchanged. I'm not entirely sure what the criticism is here.

    Matt
     
    fcsuper, Jun 16, 2008
    #6
  7. alphawave

    alphawave Guest

    I agree Cliff - but it's a new client and it's the way they do it!

    Kev
     
    alphawave, Jun 16, 2008
    #7
  8. alphawave

    alphawave Guest

    Thanks All,

    I was being dim - all comes flooding back now.

    Cheers,

    Kev
     
    alphawave, Jun 16, 2008
    #8

  9. It's also extremely common.
     
    John R. Carroll, Jun 17, 2008
    #9
  10. alphawave

    Cliff Guest

    1.5 dimensioned as 2.000 +/- .5 is not the same
    as 1.5 +/- .5.
    IF it actually works you also have to account for a wider
    actual tolerance band on one end and hence the tolerance
    you must show/declare must be *smaller* than what
    would really work *if about the geometric nominal*.

    Consider (functional) 1.375 +/- .010 ==> [1.385/1.365].
    You'd get away with (on the drawing) 1.38 +/- .005 ==> [1.385/1.375].
    See? The +/- .010 is better for manufacturing they claim ...
    and the +/- .005 costs more.
     
    Cliff, Jun 17, 2008
    #10
  11. alphawave

    Cliff Guest

    Dimension & tolerance everything to 4 places (symmetric +/- or limit)
    with your most common tolerance *for the job* then go back
    & select the tolerances you wish to change in batches.
    Used to work nice & fast on CV <G>. Looked good too.
    The DIMENSION PART command was great too IF you knew
    how to use it (few did).
     
    Cliff, Jun 17, 2008
    #11
  12. alphawave

    Cliff Guest

    Easier to remove later than to add, eh?
     
    Cliff, Jun 17, 2008
    #12
  13. alphawave

    Cliff Guest

    <Sheesh>
    Use the general tolerance note to specify +/- .005 UOS and only
    show the other tolerances in the one place needed (otherwise stated)
    but still dimension all to 3 or 4 decimal places. They just don't need
    other tolerances added as the note (UOS) covers that.

    These things are to help you & everybody else.
     
    Cliff, Jun 17, 2008
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.