Top Down failed assembly

Discussion in 'Pro/Engineer & Creo Elements/Pro' started by Sean Kerslake, Mar 6, 2007.

  1. I have a failed assembly - software bales out every time I try and open it.
    [The corruption is in the asm not he part files as I've tried moving the
    part files so I can suppress them as the asm opens]

    Not too bothered as its reasonbly simply and didn't take long to
    rebuild...... but it did start me thinking about models which fail which are
    built on a more Top Down design approach.

    If I think about some of my more complex surface models which I generally
    build in the assembly where the parts are completely intertwined through the
    assembly and various ref geom in it the idea of the asm file failing could
    present a few hours rebuilding.

    Any thoughts? What's the 'suggested' method for ensuring you can get out of
    an asm failure? I think I'll start keeping the later version files a bit
    longer than I usually do.


    Sean
     
    Sean Kerslake, Mar 6, 2007
    #1
  2. Sean Kerslake

    Jeff Howard Guest


    Nothing useful to say,
    just some babblin' ...

    The one time I 'corrupted' an assy was when I was first
    trying to sort out what Simp Reps were all about.
    Never duplicated (I was so confused I probably couldn't
    have anyway) or managed to recover it. If I were to
    guess, based on foggy memory, I'd say it had something
    to do with using one of the canned (Geometry, Graphics,
    Symbolic) component reps.

    As for recovery routines; I've never seen or heard of
    anything in the way of procedure. To tell the truth; tho'
    I've seen "crash on open" postings other than this I don't
    remember ever seeing much of a discussion develop around
    any. I might, if presented with the situation, try Create
    New Simplified Rep on Open, Excluding everything except
    the top assy and go from there, either Retrieving
    components a few at a time or loading existing Simp Reps.
    If the .asm is toast it probably won't get very far and
    it'll be more expedient to eat the time since last good save?

    FWIW, I rarely do an assy that's not top down with
    references to combinations of assembly 'construction
    geometry' features, 'master part' geometry, cust furn
    models and usually extensive use of subtractive assembly
    features. Keeping CRC's cleaned up and occasionally
    having to re-educate myself re the order of feature /
    component regeneration are the worst of my problems.
    Wonder if CRC's could be a contributor? 'Living' with any?

    Sorry can't illuminate anything. If you stumble on
    something or develop any ideas please share.
     
    Jeff Howard, Mar 7, 2007
    #2
  3. Sean Kerslake

    David Janes Guest

    I have a failed assembly - software bales out every time I try and open it.
    [The corruption is in the asm not he part files as I've tried moving the
    part files so I can suppress them as the asm opens]

    Not too bothered as its reasonbly simply and didn't take long to
    rebuild...... but it did start me thinking about models which fail which are
    built on a more Top Down design approach.

    I do a lot of modeling 'in situ', 'Insert>Component>Create', assemble the blank component, do 'Activate' and start creating features. Sometimes I reference other component geometry, sometimes I use it as just a visual reference, to get the scale right. But, when I reference other component geometry, I usually go into the newly created part and delete the external references, pick new ones inside the part. Sometimes, when I want the clearance hole in 'Part B' to follow the tapped hole in 'Part A', I'll leave them tied together, so B moves automatically when A does. Depends on your design intent


    If I think about some of my more complex surface models which I generally
    build in the assembly where the parts are completely intertwined through the
    assembly and various ref geom in it the idea of the asm file failing could
    present a few hours rebuilding.

    It's not just failing, it's whether you actually mean, intend, for some very good reason, that the geometry between two parts be tied together, linked, associative. There's a lot of associativity built into Pro/e but it can come back to bite you when you're not aware of the dependcies you're creating. However, the unwanted ones can, fortunately, be gotten rid of.


    Any thoughts? What's the 'suggested' method for ensuring you can get out of
    an asm failure? I think I'll start keeping the later version files a bit
    longer than I usually do.

    Become a close friend of the Assembly Resolve Mode! It's a bacon saver, gets your fat out of the fire when you know how to use it.

    David Janes
     
    David Janes, Mar 11, 2007
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.