SWW 2005 - The coolest FEA things.

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by P., Feb 5, 2005.

  1. P.

    P. Guest

    CosmosWorks added an impact analysis to the list of analysis types. I
    played with it for quite some time to get a feel for what it could do.
    It should come in handy for those who have to meet some kind of impact
    or drop criteria. It is limited to impact with an infinite flat plane
    and the area of contact is also limited to a small patch on the model
    closest to the impact plane. It can't do evaluation of an item in a box
    just yet. That would require moving over to GeoStar and a lot more
    work.

    NEiNastran is a real up and comer with the addition of assemblies and
    the flexibility of using hex mesh where appropriate. What I really like
    about NEiNastran is that the analysis part runs completely separate
    from SW and there is a file called a bulk file that documents the
    analysis. This means that a large analysis can be run without tying up
    SW. It also means that a permanent document of what was analyzed
    remains (the bulk file) regardless of any subsequent changes to the
    geometry in SW. SRAC's DesignStar also has this standalone capability.

    It makes a lot of sense to do the meshing within SW. After all, the
    meshing is tied intimately with the geometry. But it really doesn't
    make sense for the solver to run within SW because the solution phase
    is just a big calculation. The mesh should be documented separate from
    any changeable geometry so that what was calculated can always be
    traced back to a particular geometry for which it is valid.

    Also, because NEiNastran writes out the same data that its big brother
    NE Nastran uses, a knowledgeable analyst can have the ease of use of
    the SW interface with the power of a full blown analysis package for
    advanced analysis types. They have combined the ease of use that
    designers and beginners need with extendability to a fully featured and
    fully supported high end FEA package.

    Algor and ANSYS were also there. I didn't bother looking at either
    booth, but for very different reasons. I have a long standing bias
    against Algor based on the comments of other analysts. On the other
    hand I have a lot of respect for ANSYS and know that it is a solid
    product. I just didn't have the time.
     
    P., Feb 5, 2005
    #1
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.