SW today

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by notbob, Mar 25, 2006.

  1. notbob

    notbob Guest

    New here. I'm a retired techie-type and have a lot of experience with
    acad. When I left, SW was in its infancy and not well accepted. Our
    own head designer had reservations, preferring acad. Now, thinking of
    coming out of retirement, I wonder about the lay of the land. If
    usenet and all the other acad newsgroups I've lurked in is any
    indication, SW seems to have made great gains since I the last time I
    flogged a fillet. I have some experience with ancient pro-e and SW,
    but that was a long time ago. Howz it going, these days? If I was to
    re-enter, would I be better off sharpening my chops on SW?

    nb
     
    notbob, Mar 25, 2006
    #1
  2. notbob

    Bo Guest

    With about 500,000 seats of SolidWorks sold, there is a considerable
    demand for SWks capable designers. That can't be ignored.

    One friend of mine retired like you, but his old company asked if he
    couldn't do occassional work. He bought a Dell M50 laptop, so he could
    move from home to his clients/former employer, to hospitals, and to
    vendors. He is now busier than ever, but takes about a week a month
    off for trout fishing.

    Bo
     
    Bo, Mar 25, 2006
    #2
  3. notbob

    cadcoke3 Guest

    It is not apparent if your new work will have you on the CAD station
    for a lot of time, or if you will be working with "CAD Jockies" who
    know the program well. Of course, if the company you are working for
    is using SW, then by all means, any training you get on the program
    will be useful even if you aren't personally using it much.

    There seems to be regional concentrations of CAD programs. For
    example, locally ProEngineer is the most advertised Parametric CAD
    skill in the want ads. While I would much prefer to work using
    Solidworks, I recently took a class on Pro Engineer just to improve my
    employment opportunities.

    If you will be doing all your own CAD design work, It is possible that
    a tool you know very well (AutoCAD) is more useful to you than one you
    know less about.

    For example, I'm sure you've come across Acad drawings with lines that
    didn't meet at the corners (they didn't use OSNAP) or overridden
    dimensions which were inaccurate because the object was later
    stretched, and the dimension didn't update. An Acad novice will create
    problems because they didn't know the program well enough. The same
    issue is even more critical in a program like SolidWorks with all its
    internal relations and other complexities.

    Joe Dunfee
     
    cadcoke3, Mar 25, 2006
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.