SW SPEED

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Steve Davis, Jan 17, 2004.

  1. Steve Davis

    Steve Davis Guest

    SOLIDWORKS MUST ADDRESS THE SPEED ISSUE. POINT, CLICK, WAIT. is not how it
    should work.

    Focus subscription dollars into SPEED. I dont need any more bells or
    whistles. I WANT SPEED.


    Feel free to expand.

    SD
     
    Steve Davis, Jan 17, 2004
    #1
  2. Steve Davis

    Sporkman Guest

    Ahhh . . . new to the newsgroup, I imagine. Welcome to the chorus.
    We've pretty much ALL been saying this for several years now. But glad
    you agree. Tell it to your VAR.
     
    Sporkman, Jan 17, 2004
    #2
  3. Steve Davis

    Sporkman Guest

    My mistake . . . I see you've been posting for a little while at least.
    Well I guess it needed saying again anyway.

    'Sporky'
     
    Sporkman, Jan 17, 2004
    #3
  4. I second that, all in favor say yes!
    "Real View": Now there's a real improvement?????????????
    Turn it off for a whisper improvement in speed.

    Another disappointment for me is how slow PhotoWorks has become in 2004.

    Best Regards,
    Devon T. Sowell
    www.3-ddesignsolutions.com
     
    Devon T. Sowell, Jan 17, 2004
    #4
  5. Steve Davis

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    PW slowdown started in 2003 with the move away from Lightworks, or whatever
    they were called. Chrome looks better now but damn, just a "quick"
    rendering with textures takes forever.

    - Eddy
     
    Eddy Hicks, Jan 18, 2004
    #5
  6. Steve Davis

    Steve Davis Guest

    It needs saying daily.

    How can I implement SW in my company with it's POOR SPEED Performance.

    Enjoy.
    SD
     
    Steve Davis, Jan 18, 2004
    #6
  7. Steve Davis

    kellnerp Guest

    I just ran a little survey on the SW forum on this very subject. About a
    half dozen people responded, but the response was pretty consistently
    focused on assembly performance. Feel free to participate. Look for
    Bottleneck under the Performance Forum.
     
    kellnerp, Jan 18, 2004
    #7

  8. Yep, it needs to be faster. My expansion is that it needs to work more
    reliably as well. Doesn't matter how fast a surface lofts if it sucks or
    breaks.

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
     
    Jerry Steiger, Jan 20, 2004
    #8
  9. Steve Davis

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    Jerry, it's funny to hear you say that. My old mantra was that it needed to
    be more reliable. My new mantra was about performance. I guess I
    temporarily gave up on the reliability and focused on being able to do
    things over in less time. Weird. And you're 100% right. I could accept
    the 10% slowdown with each release if we weren't forced to re-do things so
    often. Oops, bloop! Back to the desktop. I guess I better type this
    message all over again. Oh, wait, my email program doesn't do that. That's
    right, it's only Solidworks that does that. Thanks for reminding me of the
    fading obvious. Doing things over has become second nature for most of us,
    and that ain't right.

    Agreed, Make it reliable, then faster.

    - Eddy
     
    Eddy Hicks, Jan 20, 2004
    #9
  10. Steve Davis

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    Can you forward some names to Solidworks Corp?

    ....of computer science teachers I mean :)

    - Eddy
     
    Eddy Hicks, Jan 21, 2004
    #10
  11. Steve Davis

    kellnerp Guest

    I have the funny feeling that with reliability will come speed.

    I have only one big problem, that of losing faces used in mates.

    For speed I have only one problem, the tremedous slowdown that can occur
    when a model is overconstrained.
     
    kellnerp, Jan 22, 2004
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.