SW concentric mate

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by sid, Mar 6, 2008.

  1. sid

    sid Guest

    I am trying to do a concetric mate, where SW refuses to take it
    saying that the distance between the axes is 0.0001 inches. Is there a
    way I can increase this tolerance, so that SW neglects it?
    I am using '06.

    Thanks!
     
    sid, Mar 6, 2008
    #1
  2. sid

    That70sTick Guest

    This can be vexing, especially when you know SW has the DOF needed to
    allow the mate. Try dragging your component to a new position. Also
    try suppressing other mates acting on the component and unsuppressing
    in a different order once your new mate is added.
     
    That70sTick, Mar 6, 2008
    #2
  3. sid

    TOP Guest

    I also am finding that 2008 is baulky when it comes to mating
    components that might be close to where they have to be. You will get
    a message like "part cannot be mated. Part A is some dimension from
    Part B." Part A may not even have any constraints on it. Dragging the
    component a little closer sometimes will help.

    Since 2006 mating has become much more iffy. 2008 has gotten much
    worse as far as mate stability is concerned. When you put unstable
    mates together with in-context features there is a recipe for trouble.
    I believe this is all tied in with SWIFT because this kind of behavior
    started about the same time SW started touting SWIFT.

    I am still using 2004 and find that 2004 mating is a lot more stable
    and easy to debug than 2008.

    TOP
     
    TOP, Mar 8, 2008
    #3
  4. sid

    Bo Guest

    I am primarily using SWks 2006 and have not seen the problem in
    hundreds of assemblies I've made once I saw what was causing my
    problems (maybe not yours), & my assemblies are small.

    When I did mates to surfaces, is when I would get "issues" after a
    change due to draft added, corner radii or fillets, or other edits,
    and the surface mates died on me. That is why I deliberately use axes
    and planes wherever possible. I will construct special axes and
    planes, just for mating to keep my mates stable.

    Over all, I have had zero mate problems, as I define primary or
    derived planes and axes & try to mate to them wherever possible.

    Bo
     
    Bo, Mar 8, 2008
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.