SW and multiple cores

IOW Removing two axes, 4 axes wire & lathe & any API to make it simple <G>.

 

And after all your other years of lies we should believe this exactly why?
And which of your voices is claiming this?

BTW, How about any lesser charges & non-convictions? Did you
promise to make restitution & run?

 

Guess who caught on to you early on.

LOL ... poor clueless ... hung out to dry & flapping his yap in the wind ...

Go try to impress the "folks" at your "leather" club. Nobody else will
buy your endless BS anymore (though newbies will be warned).

 

Even after his poor wife bought him a demo copy of SolidWorks (instead
of food for the kids I suppose).

I feel really sorry for those kids. And his wife probably got in
trouble pulling a banquer in trying to care for them all on her own
(and had clueless looted the accounts & saddled her with debts?).

 

He could have "joined" her in jail ...

Love your spielling checker.

 

Similar to all his years of copying from others
& posting it as his own?

 

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:54:33 -0800 (PST), wrote:

<Blah, blah, blah>

 

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:32:15 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer

Not just ignorant but Banquer-Ignorant:

[
You never chain geometry in Gibbs or SmartCAM. It's not necessary.
] - Jon Banquer - May 20, 2005

[
Create the elements in any order, and sequence them later, using
modeling tools such as Chain.
] -SmartCAM Manual -

------------------

Ignorant = Banquer

[
I hope I provided some good info on Gibbs Machining Markers and the
FACT that Gibbs doesn't have chaining tools.
]-Jon Banquer-

[
Now a quickie explanation about the Machining Markers.

The blue arrow is the direction the tool will go
(you can choose backward >or forward movement),
you highlighted one of the three circles, they tell
the tool to either go on the outside of the geometry, the inside of
the geometry, OR centered on the geometry. The white round marker is
where the toolpath starts, and the black round marker is where it
ends. The square black & white markers are the particular section of
the geometry chosen to start on. The red line it the toolpath, the
purple like is the geometry (it is purple, right? I'm color blind and
it looks like dark blue to me)
] BottleBob (a GibbsCAM user)

"Can you show us how you "chained" that geometry in Gibbscam, Bob?"
- Jon Banquer-

Jon did you even read Bob's post, the one you copied above and then
ask "Can you show us how you "chained" that geometry in Gibbscam,?"

I can show you how the geometry in GibbsCAM is chained from BottleBob
posted. Here you go, the program needs to know this as a minimum to
chain:

1) profile start
2) profile end
3) direction
4) offset

So lets look at machining markers and what BottleBob describes:

1) start:
"The white round marker is where the toolpath starts,"

2) end:
"the black round marker is where it ends."

3) direction:
"blue arrow is the direction"

4) offset:
"they tell the tool to either go on the outside of the
geometry, the inside of the geometry, OR centered on the geometry."

GibbsCAM does have auto-chaining and if the auto-chaining doesn't give
you the results you want say something like conventional cut and you
want climb cut, the chain can be edited.

If BB clicks on the blue arrow and reverses it he just reversed
the chain direction. If BB clicks on the white box and drags it to
another position he just edited the chains start point.

You can call it "Chaining" (since that is the original widely accepted
term) or you can call it "Machining Markers", hell you can even
call it "Santa Clause" if you want as long as it tells the CAM program
where the profile start, end, direction and offset is. All CAM
programs have to know that information in order to calculate the
offset tool path by any other name it's still "chaining".

-----------------------------
Not just ignorant but Banquer-Ignorant:

[
I think it depends on how you use the Flex feature <snip> For
bending things like brackets, hangers, suspension components, etc.
I think it's great and saves a lot of time.
]- Jon Banquer- September 2007

[
To answer your question I have never worked in a sheet metal shop. I'm
not using the SolidWorks Flex Feature for sheet metal parts.
] - Jon Banquer- September 2007

[
The items you described bending Jon, where you recommend using the
Flex Feature "brackets, hangers" and other like suspension parts ARE
sheet metal parts.
] -Tom-

---------------------------------

Jon on SolidWorks vs. IronCAD:

[

Let me start by saying your and idiot.

IronCAD has parametric tools, and it allows you to use direct editing
tools on the geometry as well.

So does SolidWorks. It proves you don't know either tool well enough
to open your yap about it.

IronCAD allows you to create a history based part and then overwrite
the history, essentially making the part into an imported part,
throwing away the features, and just keeping the acis/parasolid body.
You can do the same thing in SW with either an insert part or a
translation. It's a crutch, Jon. A crutch for stupid people like you.
You don't need to do that, because in SW you can do direct editing
right on the history-based model.

Your problem here starts with the fact that you never define exactly
what you're talking about, so no one can answer you properly. I
suspect the reason you don't define what your talking about is because
you don't have any fucking clue.

Mixing paradigms like that (parametric and direct editing) should be
the exception rather than the norm, but you seem to gravitate toward
the dumbassedest way of doing things. Multiple contexts all over
again. If there's a bad idea in a box, you'll find it.
] -Daisy-

-------------------

Jon on SolidWorks multiple-context:

[
JEESUS!!!!

Jon, you can't be serious! Multiple contexts? That is an absolute last
resort, even when it answers the problem, you fucktard.

Plus, if you knew anything about anything you'd know that a mate
doesn't create external relationships between parts, so that switch
won't solve the problem anyway. Notice that the beginning user didn't
do you the favor of telling you what the error message actually said,
and you fell into the trap of ASSuming you knew what it was. Dumbass.
If you were any smarter you would know that there was not enough
information to solve the problem. But that was something that was
taught in school, so you wouldn't know anything about it.

Better watch some more videos.

Did any of those books have the "use for positioning only" switch???
Why is it you refuse to learn anything? Why is that, Jon? Why are you
so fukn stupid? Did you drop out of skule bekaz yer reeding
comprehention was so bad? Did they fire you from that lame ass job
because your such a poser?

How about using a flexible subassembly? Why did you fail to think of
that, Banqueer?

Or what about making the mate in the top level? Or checking for
conflicting mates or fixed components? O just about anything 'ceptn
for that ONE forbidden apple, the multiple context switch, which isn;t
the ansswer anyway?

What a fukn joke. Here I am just a hack, and I know better than that.
Your expertness. pppbbbbtt!!

Stick to sweeping chips, faggot.

] -Daisy-

=============================

Jon on SolidWorks Flex Feature:

[

Oh, this is getting good. Say something else stupid and utterly
ignorant, Jon. I gotta hear more of that.

This demonstrates beyond doubt that you've never used either one.
Jeesis, what a dumass.
] Dusty

-------------------

Jon on SolidWorks:

[

Oh, are you gonna go off again about global shape modeling?

Please?

I love machinists doing global deformations of my models before they
machine them. Or I mean I would if my name were Salvadore Dali.
Flex is another semi-useless function in the software. You just
gravitate toward that crap.
] - Daisy-

-----------------

Jon just being banquer-dumb:

[

Yeah, I'm sure you're not, but that's not because they are not there,
it's because you are so feaking clueless. You don't have very good
control over what the feature makes. You can be precise when actually
modeling a part, but Flex just throws all that precision out the
window.
] -Daisy-

[

Never worked in a sheet metal shop, have you Jon? How the hell are you
going to manufacture something that was bent by something like that?
You don't have precise control of the results. Flex can't be used for
design or manufacturing data.

Where did you used to work before you got fired?

] -Daisy-

[

No shit?! I couldn't have told!

Really? What kind of a part is a bracket? Particularly a bent bracket?
Is it just a bent part and not sheet metal?

It's unsuitable because you're at the mercy of the software when it
comes to the shape in the flexed area. If you had ever used the
feature, you'd know this without being told.

I prefer to have the parts correct, not half-assed. Please, tell me
the name of any shop where you get a job. I want to make sure we save
time and money by not having you wreck my parts.
]-Daisy-

[

In the history of everything, one person who you don't even know from
adam posts something positive about your pet projetct, and now it
becomes gospel.

What I like is that you'll use this anonymous zander as a role model
for something you know nothing about, and then you'll bust on
engineers for creating stupidshit models which can't be made.

What you dont realize is that the Flex makes it really easy to make
stupidshit models.

Here's a novel idea. Why don't you actually use the software to make
something and tell us what you did?

Did you lose access to SolidWorks software when you got booted from
that last shop for crashing another machine?

I like indent. I don't like flex or multiple contexts although I use
then when need requires. Which is almost never.

You're still refusing to post a situation in which you would use
multiple contexts?

Credibility slipping jon. Based on using flex for sheet metal parts,
it probably is best to keep you fucking mouth shut for a change.

How about Shape, jon? I'll bet you like Shape too, don\t you./ Its as
big a piece of shit as the rest, which is how I know you'll like it.

And of course the grand daddy of useless features is Deform. This is
the one I expected you to glom onto, with the global shape modeling
and all.

Anyway, Shape and Deform. Think about them for a while. I know your
gonna love them.
] -Daisy

Tom

 

Tom Brewer = An ignorant moron who makes mistake after mistake and
never learns from his mistakes.

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

[
Hopefully SolidWorks 2004 will use ACIS as it's modeling kernel. This
alone should help to make moving between surfaces and solids much,
much easier because ACIS has the surfacing tools that Parasolid simply
does not have.
] jon_banquer-

[
If I were to guess at this point what system is best it would be UG
] - Jon Banquer-

Well Jon, how can that be since UG has long used the Parasolid kernel?

 

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

[
The only thing I agree with is, do most of us even need the accuracy
Parasolid or Acis supports? I don't think so and I'm sure many people
or programs feel they do not need to be as accurate.
]-Jon Banquer-

No not ignorant....it's way beyond ignorant it's Banquer-Ignorant

 

Tom Brewer = Ignorant

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

ROFLMAO....Jon, AutoCAD is a CAD program!

You mixed up CAM with CAD again.

They are different you know, you do know don't you, that CAD programs
DON'T generate G-Code?

Tom

 

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

[
You don't even post with SmartCAM, you generate G-code as you go
along.
]-Jon Banquer-

With your comprehension problems it's easy to see why you are
confused. SmartCAM calls their post processors "code generators".

ROFLMAO... another gem from Jon-the-Donk.....

Here you can download a bunch of free;

http://www.microsystemsgeorgia.com/smartcam_repository.htm

Open a few of them in a text editor (I know you are confused about
text editors, FYI: Microsoft Word, Notepad or WordPad will work.) that
may give you a clue as to what a Post Processor/Code Generator looks
like.


OH! And by the way when you are finished programming tool path in
SmartCAM and are ready to you know generate G-Code (v 11.5);

Click on:
1) Process
2) Code

When the code panel comes up

3) Machine
4) Choose
a) TMP file
b) SMF file
5) File
6) Accept

Now you can generate Machine G-Code, without the TMP or SMF (code
generator/post processor) files you can't because G-Code doesn't exist
until the programmer generates it.

Tom

 

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

Are you saying someone is paying a high school drop out (you), machine
operator (you) to design & model parts where you have no schooling or
work experience in engineering, design, drafting or solid modeling
where you have nearly 2 whole months experience using SolidWorks 2007?
If so what they save using untrained and unqualified personnel
designing parts they can use towards product liability insurance. I
wonder, do they falsify the credentials of the person signing off on
the design and drawings as well?

So your "Clients" are hiring a machine operator (you) to design and
draw up their parts even when you haven't finished your SolidWorks
video tutorials yet?

 

I'm saying you're (Tom Brewer) an ignorant idiot who makes mistake
after mistake after mistake and doesn't learn from his mistakes. It's
hard to learn from your mistakes when you're a lying, Usenet stalker
with no clues.

Hope this helps,

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.