SW and multiple cores

"I'm sorry Jon, I still can't give you a direct answer to the question
you have asked me for over week over in alt.machines.cnc. BTW, Jon can
you give me some advise on building engines that don't act like a live
hand grenades? Perhaps I should have met with you a few weeks ago as I
might have learned something but I'm too much of a pussy, as I have
demonstrated time and time again with ten years worth of posts to
Usenet... all most all of which stalk you, which is my way of
worshiping you. I mean how else can the amount of time I spend
stalking you be justified / explained. Thank you for letting me get
this off my chest. It's time I got honest about it.

gk"

Now it's correct Nuts son, you fucking pussy.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

LOL...that's all you got...that I use AOL...

ROFLMAO, pretty lame there Jon.

Tom

 

Still more drooling and another forgery. We still want to know if you
taught Connie (most likely) or if she taught you?

gk

 

"I'm pretty lame, Jon. From trying to equate your actions to someone
else's actions and make you responsible to my own words proving what
an ignorant idiot I have been over many years of Usenet posting. I'm
so fucking dumb and stupid my wife has to constantly remind me of it.

Tom"

Now it's correct, Brewer.

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

"Still more drooling from me. I want you to know I have spent ten
years stalking your posts on Usenet because you make me look like a
fool with such ease.

gk"

Now it's correct Nuts son.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

I wonder how Jon's wife ended up spending years in prison for forgery
and identity theft while Jon managed to leave her and make it to AZ
then CA. Guess Jon learned from their CT real estate fiasco and she
didn't.

Tom

 

Your wife spent years in prison for forgery, here you are posting
another of YOUR forgeries, two pees in a pod.

Tom

 

See your still forging posts Jon.

What crime did your wife spend years in prison for?

Oh, ya! it was FORGERY....how did you manage to flee the state and
leave her holding the bag?

Tom

 

Minor correction: I checked & IF he actually bought everything
(and since when has he actually bought anything legal at all?)
AND watched it all it should be just over 16 hours worth of
"intro to basic SW training". Probably IF he had SW to begin with.

OTOH IF he actually had SW he *could* have started with all
of the training & docs that come with it (and he did not and does
not to this day even seem to know that it exists). Probably even
applies to the student version (but perhaps not bad stolen or cracked
versions which often come with a virus or three I gather).

 

Well, UG IS a full 5 axes capable CAD/CAM system, not a simple CAM
system (such as the 2 1/2 axes one he keeps looking for but could never
grasp the basics of anyway) or CAD-only system. Not that he can tell one
from another.

But ACIS is such a *pretty* buzzword ....

 

He's of the random hack, whack & edit school. Who cares
where the holes are in the brick, anyway? By the time the
rate customer counts them & sends them back he'll hope to
be long gone. It's his MO I think AND has the added benefit
of being based on clueless BS to the shop's owner (to get
hired) and lots of doing nothing much while claiming to be
"editing" good programs on idle machines ...

 

And which is which? I doubt he knows.

A ==> B ==> C is one way.

 

He can do neither I suspect.

 

My wife is a like her men dumb and stupid and that's why were still together.

Now, it's correct, Brewer.

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

"I'm very lucky that my wife likes her men dumb and stupid because
most people don't make the kinds of ignorant mistakes I have made time
after time after time. Both Jon Banquer and my wife frequently tell me
I'm a fucking moron with no clues and it's no wonder why.

Tom"

Now it's correct, Brewer.

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

"How do you manage to always make me look like a complete fucking
idiot, Jon? Is it because just like my hero and mentor Cliff Hurpich
you can see right through my bullshit and know what phonies both of us
are? Does it have something to do with the FACT that I have made
mistake after mistake after mistake on Usenet for many years? Is it
because none of my comments on CAD or CAM have ever been posted to
known industry leading sites like upfrontezine or World CAD Access? Is
it because I'm a Usenet stalker just like my hero and mentor Cliff
Huprich?

Tom"

Now it's correct, Brewer


Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

Gee ... and your free demo account expired?
You used it for many years.

And now you've had to move AGAIN to Creelman Lane & Keyes Rd
in Ramona , California? Or is that still Chula Vista?

 

It comes to you naturally. We need little help to point it out
with all of your fine examples to choose from.

See how simple it all is?


Remember the X-files episode "Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose"?
[
Puppet: "There's something I've been wanting to ask you for some time
now. You've seen the things I do in the past as well as in the
future."

Clyde Bruckman: "They're terrible things."

Puppet: "I know they are. So tell me, please, why have I done them."

Clyde Bruckman: "Don't you understand yet son? Don't you get it?"
[Killer shakes his head] "You do the things you do because you're a
homicidal maniac."

Puppet: "That... that does explain a lot, doesn't it. It's all
starting to make sense now."
]

The Zen of the RED button:
[
When my mind is deep in the code and I'm standing at the machine
editing or creating a program I can see the tool in my mind as cuts
the part. I'm like in another world.
] - clueless

[
In better shops people know when not to bother you. When
this happens on a frequent basis it's a good sign that
perhaps one should move on.
] - clueless

"One word sums it up.....HANDWHEEL"

I can just hear him pushing a toolbox down the freeway in a hurry ....
rattle, clank, clank ....

HTH

 

Another forgery Jon, it seems you keep getting away with forgery where
your wife spent years in prison doing the same thing.

-------------
[
Before I was 30 I owned well over a hundred rental units
] -Jon Banquer-

Your wife ended up spending years in prison for Identity Theft &
Forgery. So Jon how did you guys finance those 100+ units without the
income to qualify for a loan?

And speaking of OWNING 100+ units in CT why did you end up leaving
(fleeing) CT to FL with nothing but what you could carry & ended up
living off others ever since?

----------------

[
All the racing head valve seats I saw being done were cut and then
lapped.
]- Jon Banquer -

[
When I worked in Tucson, Arizona in a race engine shop we cut all our
cylinder seats. We sometimes lapped the values in.
]- Jon Banquer -

--------------------

[
I use BobCAD/CAM DOS on the shop floor to quickly figure out points
for manual programming.
]- jon banquer

ROFLMAO......Jon, how does using a CAD/CAM program constitute "manual
programming"?

[
I like and use lowly BobCAD DOS on the shop floor when I need to find
the points for a lathe toolpath."
] jon banquer

[
What does Gibbscam have to do with BobCRAP?
] Jon Banquer

-------------------------

"it's amazing how much better SmartCAM's UI still is." - Jon Banquer -

"SmartCAM badly needs a UI makeover" -Jon Banquer -

----------------------------

[
You never chain geometry in Gibbs or SmartCAM. It's not necessary.
] - Jon Banquer - May 20, 2005

[
Create the elements in any order, and sequence them later, using
modeling tools such as Chain.
] -SmartCAM Manual -

------------------
[
I hope I provided some good info on Gibbs Machining Markers and the
FACT that Gibbs doesn't have chaining tools.
]-Jon Banquer-

[[

Can you show us how you "chained" that geometry in Gibbscam, Bob?
] - Jon Banquer-

Jon did you even read Bob's post, the one you copied above?

Obviously you know nothing about championing. Here I can show you how
the geometry in GibbsCAM is chained. Here you go:

The program needs to know this as a minimum to chain:

1) profile start
2) profile end
3) direction
4) offset

So lets look at machining markers and what Bottle Bob describes:

1) start:
"The white round marker is where the toolpath starts,"

2) end:
"the black round marker is where it ends."

3) direction:
"blue arrow is the direction"

4) offset:
"they tell the tool to either go on the outside of the
geometry, the inside of the geometry, OR centered on the geometry."

Now if BB clicks on the blue arrow and reverses it he just reversed
the chain direction. If BB clicks on the white box and drags it to
another position he just edited the chains start point.

You can call it "Chaining" (since that is the original widely accepted
term) or you can call it "Machining Markers", hell you can even
call it "Santa Clause" if you want as long as it tells the CAM program
where the profile start, end, direction and offset is. All CAM
programs have to know that information in order to calculate the
offset tool path by any other name it's still "chaining".
] -Tom-

------------------------------

[
I think it depends on how you use the Flex feature <snip> For
bending things like brackets, hangers, suspension components, etc.
I think it's great and saves a lot of time.
]- Jon Banquer- September 2007

[
To answer your question I have never worked in a sheet metal shop. I'm
not using the SolidWorks Flex Feature for sheet metal parts.
] - Jon Banquer- September 2007

[
The items you described bending Jon, where you recommend using the
Flex Feature "brackets, hangers" and other like suspension parts ARE
sheet metal parts.
] -Tom-

--------------------------------

[
Speaking of opportunity fucktard shouldn't you be asking for
suggestions on how to improve your SolidWorks Bible
]- Jon Banquer - July 14, 2007

[
SolidWorks 2007 Bible "the content is just superb!
] - Jon Banquer - Aug 8, 2007

[
(I'm at page 500... I needed a break for a week because it's often so
fucking boring because of how it's laid out and because you refuse to
make it more tutorial based.) I should knock down 200 or so pages this
week. Which still won't get me to Multibodies! Just fucking
ridiculous, Matt.
] - Jon Banquer - Aug 19-2007

[
I would strongly suggest you buy The SolidWorks Bible. It will give
you many insights into how SolidWorks works
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 19, 2007

----------------------------

[
I don't give a shit becaus"OneCNC looks good.
] - Jon Banquer - Aug 31 2003

[
OneCNC he has delivered on creating a good CADCAM system.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 23, 2003

[
My advice would be to get your feet wet with a bargain basement
CAD/CAM system such as OneCNC.
]- Jon Banquer - May 7, 2005

[
OneCNC needs *major* work!
]- Jon Banquer - Jan 14, 2007

[
It seems that OneCNC is so bad" "Since I've had to use this piece of
crap
]- Jon Banquer - June 30, 2007

[
You deserve to get fucked if you think Onecnc can hold a candle to any
of the packages you named.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 19, 2007

---------------------

[
Franco Folini Novedge: UPDATE -- July 8, 2007 --
http://blog.novedge.com/2007/07/an-interview-wi.html

"Jon didn't respect our agreement, posting comments under fake
names. Jon's authentic and fake comments are all posted from the same
IP address, <snipped IP Address> I can now see that my trust in Jon
was misplaced."
]

Then when Jon got caught and exposed for violating his agreement with
the author he couldn't keep his excuses straight:

[

Because it can't be done without wasting massive amounts of my time!
] - Jon Banquer on Jul 9 2007

[
I figured for once I'd give these posters a taste or their own
medicine which seemed to anger the host of the Blog who had elected to
go with an unmoderated format.
] -Jon Banquer- July 18, 2007-

[
getting even with a CADCAM salesman
] -Jon Banquer - March 4, 2008

So Jon, out of your three separate and distinctly different excuses,
which one is the truth?

----------------

[
I'm committed to working with HSMWorks to doing just that. Shouldn't
be too hard because their head of US operations and I see things in
almost the exact same way and because HSMWorks is interested in what I
have to say and wants to work with me.
]- Jon Banquer -

[
Who I'm working with to deliver what truly will be the next generation
of CAM: www.hsmworks.com
]-Jon Banquer-

[
Jon is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we cannot
control what people are writing on the web. Anybody can get
evaluation licenses of HSMWorks and test it themselves. I hope this
clarifies any doubt.
] - HSMWorks ApS -

--------------------

[
I dropped out of high school to pursue my dream of making a lot of
money and never went back
] - Jon Banquer

[
Jon,

SolidWorks can't make you, a machine operator into a designer/engineer
anymore than MS Word could make a Simi-functional illiterate (you)
into a writer.

CAD programs can't make up for your lack of a foundation built by
education and/or experience in this field you repeatedly attempt to
pose as an expert where you are simply a clueless beginner.
]


[
Without a doubt SaladWorks is a complete piece of shit
]- Jon Banquer - May 21, 2006

[
I've been away from SolidWorks for almost ten years.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 2007

[
SolidWorks is consuming every available minute of my learning time
right now.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 12, 2007

[
The program has changed so much in ten years that I'm still way behind
where I need to be.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug. 26, 2007

-----------------------------------

[
Need I remind you that it's you who is too much of a pussy to say a
word to Bill Gibbs on how you really feel about his claims of no
chaining.
]- Jon Banquer - July 15, 2007

[
Last time I saw Bill Gibbs at a trade show he almost pissed in his
pants... I went out of my way to be polite and not disturb his
presentation.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 11, 2007

---------------------------------------

 

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:19:49 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer

Well Jon it seems you keep getting away with forgery where your wife
spent years in prison doing the same thing.

-------------
[
Before I was 30 I owned well over a hundred rental units
] -Jon Banquer-

Your wife ended up spending years in prison for Identity Theft &
Forgery. So how did you guys finance those 100+ units without the
income to qualify for a loan?

After OWNING 100+ units in CT why did you end up leaving (fleeing) CT
to FL with nothing but what you could carry.

You know where you ended up living off others ever since and working
as a machine operator?

Tom