SW and multiple cores

Now it's correct Madcowman.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

Actually, I have no idea where he lives. Perhaps I should ask my wife.

Now it's correct, Brewer.

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

Which highway bridge does a loser like me live under? Or have I set up a

Now it's correct Madcowman.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

"It's only $25 and they claim it's as good or better than $600 I spent on the
SolidProfessor Professional video course." - Jul 19 2007 by jon_banquer

"Suggest you spend $25 and take the myigetit SolidWorks course." - Aug 26 2007
by jon_banquer

"I'm very happy with the $600 I spent for the SolidProfessor Professional
video course." - Jul 19 2007 by jon_banquer

"The surfacing part of the SolidProfessor Professional video course is badly
lacking. It's just the very basics." - Jul 19 2007 by jon_banquer

"I'll be reviewing the www.myigetit.com SolidWorks course shortly." - Jul 19
2007 by jon_banquer

"I will be starting the www.myigetit.com Solidworks course in the next
week or so. " - Jul 19 2007 by jon_banquer

Don't you bother to read what you post/copy or follow your own advice?

YOU claimed it was better (for $25) and compared better/covered more,
nobody else.

And NEVER had the $25, eh? Or any clues at all.

HTH

 

Your ugly reading comprehension problems surfaced again.
Tom said nothing about the user interface. OTOH He seems to be
able to well use it & you cannot & do not.

Don't you know what a user interface is? Clearly not.

BTW, What are layers and what are levels and what are catagories? Any
clues which is which?

 

And Tom got a deal.
Found any more US$ 8/Hr jobs in San Diego?
In public housing?

 

You dont suppose that it's a CAM program, do you? Ever heard of any?

BTW, It uses the ACIS kernel.

"Finally, I have said for a long time that ACIS is an excellent kernel." - Jan
14 2007 by jon_banquer

"Why do you think developers that are interested in building hybrid modelers
choose ACIS" - Jan 15 2006 by jon_banquer

"If it's Alibre they should save their money and figure out away to use the
rest of what they get with the ACIS kernel they license. Solid only modelers
don't cut it in the real world." - Jun 12 2005 by jon banquer

"Neither does it occur between Michael Gailey who dislikes the ACIS kernel or
myself (I like the ACIS kernel)." - May 14 2005 by jon_banquer

"Your best bet is to talk to developers who use ACIS and find out why they
don't choose Parasolid. The answer you will get is that ACIS gives them the
surfacing tool kit that Parasolid does not." - Apr 20 2005 by jon_banquer
(UG uses ParaSolid.)

"The tools have existed in the ACIS kernel and Advanced Surfacing Husk for a
long time. " - Jan 6 2005 by jon_banquer

"It actually "does" use both Parasolid, and Acis. Both engines fired up under
the hood and running at the same time. " - Sep 17 2003 by jon_banquer
(Snicker)

"The only thing I agree with is, do most of us even need the accuracy
Parasolid or Acis supports? I don't think so and I'm sure many people or
programs feel they do not need to be as accurate. " - Feb 1 2003 by jon_banquer
(Snicker)

"Hopefully SolidWorks 2004 will use ACIS as it's modeling kernel. This alone
should help to make moving between surfaces and solids much, much easier
because ACIS has the surfacing tools that Parasolid simply does not have." - Jan
29 2003 by jon_banquer
(Snicker -- UG has long used ParaSolid.)

"ACIS makes a LOT of sense, Mark. Parasolid makes NO sense." - Feb 19 2002 by
jon_banquer

On & on he went for about a decade ... but still clueless.
Still, "kernel" IS a nice buzzword, right? Just like ACIS. Which
did he hear first?

 

Ignorant:

Jon, how does a post processor attempt to compensate for something
that is not done in the "CAM program"?

What is the difference between programming Aerospace parts and
Non-Aerospace parts?

Are you saying someone is paying a high school drop out (you), machine
operator (you) to design & model parts where you have no schooling or
work experience in engineering, design, drafting or solid modeling
where you have nearly 2 whole months experience using SolidWorks?

If so what they save using untrained and unqualified personnel
designing parts they can use towards product liability insurance. I
wonder, do they falsify the credentials of the person signing off on
the design and drawings as well?

So your "Clients" are hiring a machine operator (you) to design and
draw up their parts even when you haven't finished your SolidWorks
video tutorials yet?

Yes, please do.

Said yes a few times, where is that list Jon?

How are you coming along with that list of people / companies with no
mechanical engineers who have designed their own engines, gearboxes?

You liked SolidWorks 1998 but called SW 2006 a complete piece of shit.
So what changed between SW-1998 that you liked and SW-2006 that made
it a complete piece of shit Jon?

So what were you basing your opinions on these past years trashing SW,
especially since you didn't know or use SolidWorks at the time?

How can that be Jon? I never said anything about "real price paid in
the market".

[
I'm committed to working with HSMWorks to doing just that. Shouldn't
be too hard because their head of US operations and I see things in
almost the exact same way and because HSMWorks is interested in what I
have to say and wants to work with me.
] - Jon Banquer -

[
Who I'm working with to deliver what truly will be the next generation
of CAM: www.hsmworks.com
]-Jon Banquer-

[
Jon Banquer is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we
cannot control what people are writing on the web. Anybody can get
evaluation licenses of HSMWorks and test it themselves. I hope this
clarifies any doubt.
]- HSMWorks ApS -

So CAD/CAM companies are now competing with credit card companies?

 

Based on all his prior posts he has no real idea what postprocessors do,
how or why. Nor do posts trying to educate him in simple basics ever sink in.

Conclusion: He's utterly clueless & has never used such for much of
everything.

But he's made lots of funny posts himself <VBG>.
I really enjoyed the bits about it being manditory to constantly
"edit the posts" for each part, machine, machine operator & shift.
And about "reverse posting" edited g-code to alter the CAD models
to suit.
And his whines looking for all sorts of "graphical editors".
Plus his concerns about finding any CAM or CAD/CAM program
that could be used for 2 1/2 axes work.

But little (recently) tops the "fixture offset" & drag-n-drop
(to alter) work coordinate systems posts.
I wonder what happens to any code generated with the WCS
before he dragged it to a new random location & orientation when
it's regenerated ...
And if he'll ever find out what fixture offsets are ...

Don't you just love his private language (all those little voices
making things up in his head as he's never used such) use
and his attraction to buzzwords he's heard of?

 

The laughed at his application to P&W? No basic shop math,
just for starters, probably no pass of Middle School, no HS transcript ..

And he'd not know 3 axes from 5 axes from 2 1/2 axes .... all the
same ... and why are his holes in those reworked used connecting rods
rejected? He made the design BETTER by leaving one out & moving
another PLUS he liked one much larger so he "double-drilled" it and
used his dulled ("diamond hone" remove all sharp edges) reamer to fix
the bolt holes ...

 

He has lots of free time NOW to get "published" (& copy ads) <G>.

 

It's called "untrained unskilled labor". For far better results go to India
or Mexico. They could probably pass HS there. AND don't need laminated
pictures of triangles to find out when to use a Sine.

 

Even a banquer could "design" such by copying the work of others but
don't expect the stuff to work well or for long.

Can you see the piston bores after 3dinkies & random edits make them
all pretty, lumpy & swoopy?

 

It's called "untrained unskilled labor". For far better results go to India
or Mexico. They could probably pass HS there. AND don't need laminated
pictures of triangles to find out when to use a Sine.

 

I took a look at their release notes on the latest sets of changes.
Bug fixes & a few enhancements due to real users.
Not a single thing that looked like poor clueless had been involved,
not even changes to icon colours or the use of the XML kernel.

I think they have his clueless BS number now.
Perhaps somebody should ask them again <VBG>.

 

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

Ignorant:[
I'll be reviewing the www.myigetit.com SolidWorks course shortly.
] jon_banquer, July 2007

[
I will be starting the www.myigetit.com Solidworks course in the next
week or so.
] jon_banquer, July 2007

So Jon it's been nearly 8 months now, how long does it take you to
finish an 8-hour or so video course?

[
Hopefully SolidWorks 2004 will use ACIS as it's modeling kernel. This
alone should help to make moving between surfaces and solids much,
much easier because ACIS has the surfacing tools that Parasolid simply
does not have.
] -Jon Banquer-

[
If I were to guess at this point what system is best it would be UG
] -Jon Banquer-

Well Jon, how can that be since UG has long used the Parasolid kernel?

[
He pushes UG as THE CAD/CAM solution. Can't think of worse advice for
many small job shops
] - Jon Banquer -

[
If I were to guess at this point what system is best it would be UG
] - Jon Banquer-

[
The only thing I agree with is, do most of us even need the accuracy
Parasolid or ACIS supports? I don't think so and I'm sure many people
or programs feel they do not need to be as accurate.
]-Jon Banquer-

[
The beautiful thing about working with this 1/2 million dollar
horizontal machine with 12 pallets is that I spend very little time
running parts and spend the majority of my time on programming,
setting up and optimizing the program.
] - Jon Banquer - 12 May 2007

You have a machine designed for high production. You are glad that
your machine spends little time running parts while you are
programming, setting up and fixing programming errors (AKA: optimizing
the program) at the control...........LOL........... only in
Banquerland could someone be happy about that.

Oh! Jon, BTW your machine only has 11 pallets, since you can't count
check the large sticker on the machines front panel, in VERY large
letters it tells you and everyone else how many pallets your machine
has.

Are you still working for this company?
How long did your employment last before you "left"?

Jon, how does a post processor compensate for something that is not
done in the "CAM program"?

What is the difference between programming Aerospace parts and
Non-Aerospace parts?

Are you saying someone is paying a high school drop out (you), machine
operator (you) to design & model parts where you have no schooling or
work experience in engineering, design, drafting or solid modeling
where you have nearly 2 whole months experience using SolidWorks 2007?
If so what they save using untrained and unqualified personnel
designing parts they can use towards product liability insurance. I
wonder, do they falsify the credentials of the person signing off on
the design and drawings as well?

So your "Clients" are hiring a machine operator (you) to design and
draw up their parts even when you haven't finished your SolidWorks
video tutorials yet?

Yes, please do.

Said yes a few times, where is that list Jon?

How are you coming along with that list of people / companies with no
mechanical engineers who have designed their own engines, gearboxes?

You liked SolidWorks 1998 but called SW 2006 a complete piece of shit.
So what changed between SW-1998 that you liked and SW-2006 that made
it a complete piece of shit Jon?

So what were you basing your opinions these past years, especially
since you didn't know or use SolidWorks at the time?

How can that be Jon? I never said anything about "real price paid in
the market".

[
I'm committed to working with HSMWorks to doing just that. Shouldn't
be too hard because their head of US operations and I see things in
almost the exact same way and because HSMWorks is interested in what I
have to say and wants to work with me.
] - Jon Banquer -

[
Who I'm working with to deliver what truly will be the next generation
of CAM: www.hsmworks.com
]-Jon Banquer-

[
Jon Banquer is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we
cannot control what people are writing on the web. Anybody can get
evaluation licenses of HSMWorks and test it themselves. I hope this
clarifies any doubt.
]- HSMWorks ApS -

So CAD/CAM companies are now competing with credit card companies?

 

I see you're following you hero and mentor Cliff Huprich's lead and
cross posting you fucking ignorant idiot. Ever notice how you, Cliffy,
Joe 788 all use AOL. Try asking your wife for some clues, Brewer:

Ignorant:

"Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong
decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times
that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and
after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as
well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a
decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned
out poorly." .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

"I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are
what I want and/ or need."... Tom Brewer who can't follow his own
advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet
staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for
doing so.

Ignorant:

"I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is
in your mouth and your head is in your ass."... Tom Brewer admitting
what he's often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage
of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's
Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped
anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to
answer any questions that "Vinny" had on master modeling or skeletal
modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done...
now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's unable to comprehend what's on the cover of the
SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can't understand more than a simple "I love it!" or "I
hate it!" type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say
that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25
SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks
course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when
you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

"I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks."

"FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was
tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that
I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid
Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously."

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and
yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user
interface problems:

"The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get
cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free
Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the
way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap
filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I
have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better."

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he's a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is
someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows
absolutely everything about nothing.

 

Easy Jonnie, you're drooling again.....

gk