SW 2005 surface modeling question

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Mark, May 29, 2005.

  1. Mark

    Mark Guest

    I am having trouble making a fillet along the edge of a solid created from a
    surface. The surface is an imported iges from Surfcam. There is a ripple
    which prevents the fillet from forming. How can I smooth out that ripple so
    I can thicken the part and make a fillet? You can see the part on my
    Solidworks page:

    http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=16&groupid=145864&ck=

    Mark
     
    Mark, May 29, 2005
    #1
  2. Mark

    Cliff Guest

    Send it back to the SurfCam user & have them fix it.
    WHY IN THE WORLD ARE THEY DOING DESIGN IN SURFCAM?
     
    Cliff, May 29, 2005
    #2
  3. Mark

    Mark Guest

    The surface comes from a point cloud. This is how it comes into Surfcam. Can
    you suggest how to fix the ripple in Surfcam, as I am new to Surfcam and am
    doing the tutorials this weekend.

    Mark
     
    Mark, May 29, 2005
    #3
  4. Mark

    Mitch Guest

    Hi Mark,

    You're probably going to have a tough time fixing that kind of stuff in
    Surfcam. One thing you might try is to split the surface on either side of
    the ripple. To do this you'll need to create surface splines with which to
    break the existing surface. (it's been forever since I tried to edit
    geometry in Surfcam) Once the offending is split out and deleted, you can
    create a blend surface to replace it which will be tangent to the originals.
    This would be under create>surface>blend.

    Your adjacent geometry may no longer match up enough to be closed in SW
    after, though... This is something that would be a lot easier in a surface
    modeler like Rhino, or perhaps directly in SW. If you don't get any
    satisfaction, I've e-mailed you with my address, you can send an iges or
    Surfcam file to me and I'll see what I can do with it in Rhino.
     
    Mitch, May 29, 2005
    #4
  5. Mark

    Mark Guest

    Please remove 'nospam' from my email address to get the correct address.
    Mark
     
    Mark, May 29, 2005
    #5
  6. Mark

    matt Guest


    You could trim it
    You could Delete Face and use the Fill surface command
    You could Delete Face and then Loft

    You can also consider different kinds of fillets:

    Face Fillet gets around a lot of irregularities
    Face Fillet with Hold Lines allows you to manually specify the edges of
    the fillet, but is more of a loft or fill, not a strictly "arc based"
    fillet.
    You could also just do the whole thing manually by trimming the surfaces
    back on both sides of the edge and then lofting the blend from one side
    to the other.

    If you're gonna work in SolidWorks surfaces, you'll get good at all the
    dances you have to do to make things work.

    Matt
     
    matt, May 29, 2005
    #6
  7. Mark

    Cliff Guest

    Nope.
    But I crossposted it to AMC where someone else may
    have clues <G>.
    Without knowing the design intent .... looks like someone
    goofed from here.
    I'd still send it back to be fixed. The SurfCam guy may
    have to send it back or request new data too. Anything
    else is just guessing.
     
    Cliff, May 29, 2005
    #7
  8. Mark

    Mark Guest

    What is AMC?


     
    Mark, May 29, 2005
    #8
  9. Mark

    Cliff Guest

    Usenet newsgroup alt.machines.cnc.
     
    Cliff, May 29, 2005
    #9
  10. Mark,


    It looks symmetrical, and has one good side. Split it and mirror the result.


    Regards

    Mark
     
    Mark Mossberg, May 29, 2005
    #10
  11. Mark

    Mitch Guest

    alt.machines.cnc
     
    Mitch, May 29, 2005
    #11
  12. Mark

    Mark Guest

    I got the part done by trimming off the bad edge and lofting back to a
    smooth composite sketch of the edge. I used three sections in my loft. The
    sections were created by pulling lines off the surfaces using the
    intersection curve function. I thickened beyond the necessary thickness and
    then filleted. I then used an offset and extended the surface to cut away
    the not needed thickness. Thanks to Matt all who gave suggestions. No thanks
    to those who said send it back to the other guy to fix. See results on my
    web site as mentioned above.

    Mark
     
    Mark, May 30, 2005
    #12
  13. Mark

    Cliff Guest

    But you have no idea at all if it's correct.
     
    Cliff, May 30, 2005
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.