Surfaces vs Solids - Which?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by What-A-Tool, Aug 25, 2005.

  1. It is unless the software is designed accordingly. Hardware is so fast today
    that the mach8ining tesselation is often created on the fly and then
    discarded unless you specifically elect to save it.
    Only the real hacks still do this. They exist but they are very cheap
    systems. Even RhinoCam at 1K is regenerative.
    That is the industry buzz word in many places - "Regenerative". Cim Link
    used to make a big deal about it. They did, IMHO, have a great engine
    though.
    Not much of any issue except to purists like you and I Cliff. Todays kids
    don't know different and it doesn't matter much. Nobody really cares since
    there is not competetive dissadvantage in the market place.
    Sweet Jesus who in their right mind would want to remember THAT :>)
     
    John R. Carroll, Aug 28, 2005
    #21
  2. What-A-Tool

    Bing Guest

    Heh, roger that.

    Bing
     
    Bing, Aug 28, 2005
    #22
  3. What-A-Tool

    Kevin Steele Guest

    Why on earth do you "NEED" soldis for mould design. I use Solidworks
    for product design, but I would never use it for mould tool design, it
    simply is not up to my usual mould tool software -which is purely
    surface based. When it comes to defining complex 3D split lines and
    shut-outs the tools in Solidworks don't cut it for me.

    Regards

    Kevin
     
    Kevin Steele, Aug 29, 2005
    #23
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.