STRUCTURAL QUESTION

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by longshot, Dec 28, 2004.

  1. longshot

    longshot Guest

    anyone have a chart or know what is the amount of weight that can be applied
    to 1 1/4" square tube with 1/8" wall at a span of 5 foot to achieve minimum
    deflection ... . I have been using it for handrail for per a customer's
    specs, & did some for another customer that is questioning the size of it.
    all OSHA says is strong enough to withstand 200 lbs with minimum deflection


    TIA
    Rob
     
    longshot, Dec 28, 2004
    #1
  2. A steel industry handbook (assuming it's steel) will give you the specs you
    will need to perform a
    calculation for deflection. What's "minimum deflection"? Is that 200# a
    point or distributed?
    In these parts the building code specifies the load conditions to be met
    by a handrail and a guard. Have you checked your local code?
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Dec 28, 2004
    #2
  3. longshot

    longshot Guest

    yes, steel A36 , 200# on any 2" point...
    usually the customer is responsible for permits & "design" we merely
    fabricate.. of course it takes more than a scratchpad to actually get it
    built(my job), but the concept & liability is generally left to the
    customer.
     
    longshot, Dec 29, 2004
    #3
  4. If the client is designing it and takes responsibility, why are
    you worrying about it?
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Dec 29, 2004
    #4
  5. longshot

    longshot Guest

    I said usually.. this is a different client, I am not worried about it ~
    other than it not being up to osha's standard, which only states that it
    must withstand 200# w/minimal deflection., I jumped my fat ass up & down on
    it. :eek:)
     
    longshot, Dec 29, 2004
    #5
  6. Are you working for/with engineers?
    I wouldn't stick out my neck as far as
    liability goes for what probably wasn't enough
    money. BTW, what's "minimal"? 1/480? 1/360?
    It's a handrail, right?
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Dec 29, 2004
    #6
  7. longshot

    longshot Guest

    Are you working for/with engineers?
    yeah, engineers at various companies, usually process or chemical engineers,
    not much help in the line of structural questions. according to OSHA.
    minimal deflection is only described in another section which states that
    under the 200 lb stress test, the rail cannot bend to a point less than 39"
    high.
    (which started with a total height of 42" Tall) it's really not clear.
     
    longshot, Dec 30, 2004
    #7
  8. 3" in a 60" span is totally MASSIVE deflection,
    and probably not one from which the member
    could recover. You can't have that right.

    If your engineers are stamping the work then it's not
    your problem unless it's one of those places where it ALWAYS your
    problem when stuff goes wrong, even though you're not in charge...
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Dec 30, 2004
    #8
  9. longshot

    longshot Guest

    in theory my company does NOT do design, of course the people giving us the
    jobs have no idea how or what it takes to build their ideas, so we "lay it
    out" (make fabrication prints) & and have them approve the drawing before
    construction. there's some small print on our blueprints that pretty much
    says all that, I really don't know if it amounts to much legally.
    I always thought it was an ISO thing. the 3" defelction doesn't freak me
    out, i mean , i think we could actually use wooden 2x4's & keep OSHA
    satisfied.. i dunno, it's not my call apparently.
    Rob
     
    longshot, Dec 31, 2004
    #9
  10. You're probably right, a 2x4 should do the trick for a handrail load
    depending on the span of course. However,
    I think you've probably misread the code. It probably allows for
    deviation for a specified height, or declares a minimum height.
    The three inches may be the difference between what you have
    drawn and what is required, but I don't think that 3" in 60" is an
    acceptable
    deflection in for ANYTHING accept a structure meant to be used once
    and discarded after deformation.
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Dec 31, 2004
    #10
  11. longshot

    longshot Guest

    I disagree, I need a chart that shows acceptable materials at specific
    spans. I have seen them, I just can't seem to find one right now,
     
    longshot, Dec 31, 2004
    #11
  12. longshot

    CW Guest

    You really didn't think an engineer would tell you to go by published
    material, did you? :)
     
    CW, Dec 31, 2004
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.