Star benchmark doesn't run

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Marc Gibeault, Aug 9, 2005.

  1. It still stops at the same line

    CheckRelease = CLng(Left(swApp.RevisionNumber(),
    InStr(swApp.RevisionNumber(), "."))

    And gives the same error message
     
    Marc Gibeault, Aug 11, 2005
    #21
  2. Marc Gibeault

    TOP Guest

    Duh, do you see the problem? The first is from your code and the second
    from mine. Somehow a closing paren went missing. Sorry, I should have
    caught that long ago.

    CheckRelease =
    CLng(Left(swApp.RevisionNumber(),InStr(swApp.RevisionNumber(), "."))

    CheckRelease = CLng(Left(swApp.RevisionNumber(),
    InStr(swApp.RevisionNumber(), ".")))
     
    TOP, Aug 11, 2005
    #22
  3. No, sorry, that's not it. I probably missed one when copy/pasting
    around... Here it is correctly copied from the macro editor (and it
    doesn't have a line break)

    CheckRelease = CLng(Left(swApp.RevisionNumber(),
    InStr(swApp.RevisionNumber(), ".")))
     
    Marc Gibeault, Aug 11, 2005
    #23
  4. Marc Gibeault

    TOP Guest

    I am about at the end of things to try.

    Paste this in:

    CheckRelease = 13 'SW 2005

    And comment out the offending line with a single quote at the beginning
    of the line.
     
    TOP, Aug 11, 2005
    #24
  5. Yeah! that works!

    Thanks,

    -Marc
     
    Marc Gibeault, Aug 11, 2005
    #25
  6. Marc Gibeault

    TOP Guest

    If you run on 2004 use 12, 2005 use 13 and 2006 use 14.

    I am at a loss to know why that line of code is not working for you.
    It has to be in Instr or Clng.
     
    TOP, Aug 11, 2005
    #26
  7. I did the test on 15 machines here and it's the only one with that
    problem. There's even one wich was bought and configured at the same
    time and is, as far as I can tell, identical...

    Thanks anyway for your efforts and the time you put on that tool,

    -Marc
     
    Marc Gibeault, Aug 11, 2005
    #27
  8. Marc Gibeault

    TOP Guest

    Which suggests that there might be a problem with VBA that you want to
    follow up on.

    It would be nice to see the results you got too. Especially how much
    variation you had between machines and what the hardware was.
     
    TOP, Aug 11, 2005
    #28
  9. It's not complete but so far;
    All were with 5 iterations, rebuild time added and done 3 times. All
    with SW 2005
    Score is this Excel formula:
    =((45.59+4.47)+(42.75+3.75)+(43.47+4.17))/3

    Athlon64 3800+ 2GB RAM XP Pro SP2 = 48.07
    Athlon64 3000+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1 = 48.97
    Athlon64 3800+ 2GB RAM XP Pro SP2 = 54.11
    Pentium m 1700 512MB RAM XP Pro SP1 = 59.61 (centrino notebook)
    2x Opteron 246 4GB RAM XP Pro SP1 = 81.84 (This one still rocks for
    renderings but is not very good with SW)
    AthlonXP 2400+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1 = 83.95
    AthlonXP 2200+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1 = 85.61
    Pentium 4 2800 1GB XP Pro SP1 = 108.06
    Pentium 4m 1900 512MB XP Pro SP1 = 121.05
    AthlonXP 1800+ 1GB RAM WIN2k = 127.57
    AthlonXP 2600+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1 = 234.87 (My workstation, needs a
    reformat)

    We see that some machines needs to be tuned up.

    I also do a rendering test with 3dsMax and it's not always the same
    order...

    -Marc
     
    Marc Gibeault, Aug 11, 2005
    #29
  10. Marc Gibeault

    TOP Guest

    If it is available could you post the averages of both the score for
    construction and the rebuild separately?

    The Opteron score does not make much sense. I have an FX53 which is
    about as close to Opteron as you can get and it is faster than any of
    these scores. Can you set processor affinity to a single processor for
    SW and see what happens?
     
    TOP, Aug 12, 2005
    #30
  11. Here are the full results. I also included the results of a rendering
    test done with VRay within Max, the score is in percentage of the
    fastest.

    2x Opteron 246 4GB RAM XP Pro SP1
    =((74.05+4.6)+(77.42+4.95)+(79.14+5.37))/3 = 81.84
    Rendering = 100%

    I cannot do any tests today as it's rendering full-time for a few days,
    and I'm going in vacation for two weeks.

    The others:

    Athlon64 3800+ 2GB RAM XP Pro SP2
    =((45.59+4.47)+(42.75+3.75)+(43.47+4.17))/3 = 48.07
    Rendering = 58%

    Athlon64 3000+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1
    =((46.16+4.19)+(46.75+4.44)+(40.53+4.84))/3 = 48.97
    Rendering = 54%

    Athlon64 3800+ 2GB RAM XP Pro SP2
    =((49.4+4.87)+(48.65+4.32)+(49.96+5.13))/3 = 54.11
    Rendering = 63%

    Pentium m 1700 512MB RAM XP Pro SP1 (centrino notebook)
    =((53.2+5.44)+(53.9+5.66)+(55.6+5.02))/3 = 59.61
    Rendering = NA

    AthlonXP 2400+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1
    =((78.52+6.81)+(75.96+6.59)+(76.88+7.09))/3 = 83.95
    Rendering = 42%

    AthlonXP 2200+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1
    =((77.07+7.26)+(78.15+7.64)+(79.06+7.65))/3 = 85.61
    Rendering = NA

    Pentium 4 2800 1GB XP Pro SP1
    =((102.1+6.74)+(103.48+7.29)+(97.82+6.74))/3 = 108.06
    Rendering = 52%

    Pentium 4m 1900 512MB XP Pro SP1
    =((113.5+9.47)+(109.68+9.91)+(110.8+9.79))/3 = 121.05
    Rendering = NA

    AthlonXP 1800+ 1GB RAM WIN2k
    =((117.15+9.61)+(117.77+9.58)+(119.22+9.39))/3 = 127.57
    Rendering = 32%

    AthlonXP 2600+ 1GB RAM XP Pro SP1
    =((231.54+8.56)+(230.73+8.54)+(217.66+7.59))/3 = 234.87
    Rendering = 34%

    -Marc
     
    Marc Gibeault, Aug 12, 2005
    #31
  12. Marc Gibeault

    TOP Guest

    36.94/3.64
    AMD 64 FX53
    4GB PC2700
    NVIDIA FX3000
    SW2004 SP4.1 36.94/3.64
    SW2005 SP 3.1 53.24/4.7

    SW2004 gave times a little slower than 2005 when I had an assembly
    loaded. I unloaded and restarted.
     
    TOP, Aug 12, 2005
    #32
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.