solidworld 2004

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Steve Davis, Jan 24, 2004.

  1. Steve Davis

    Steve Davis Guest

    I just attended my 1st Solidworld in Sunny Boston.

    I love the software and do not want to bash but I felt let down. My
    expectations were much higher.

    I expected more useful information. Maybe I attended the wrong seminars
    but it seemed like there was the BASIC and Programming seminars.
    The last thing I want to do is to tell my boss that I am disappointed.

    I did learn alot from the other participants. Thank you.

    Done venting.

    SD
     
    Steve Davis, Jan 24, 2004
    #1
  2. Steve Davis

    kellnerp Guest

    SWW is a far cry from what it started out to be in Palm Springs. I didn't
    attend this year because there was nothing much there that I could use to
    justify going. In previous years there were three days jam packed with
    seminars that were worth it. I was hard pressed to find any this year that
    I hadn't attended before or that filled in gaps in my knowledge.
     
    kellnerp, Jan 25, 2004
    #2
  3. Steve Davis

    matt Guest



    JK:

    I'm curious about what your impression of the mold tools is. I've been a
    pretty vocal critic on the advisory board area, and I'd like to hear from
    someone else who knows which side of the mold to squirt the plastic in.
    I've had nothing but bad luck with them since beta, but I saw that they
    were in the list of favorite new features in 2004 from SWW. Am I missing
    something?


    matt
     
    matt, Jan 26, 2004
    #3
  4. Steve Davis

    Glenn Franck Guest

    This was my 4th consecutive SWW and although I found it worthwhile, it
    didn't hold a candle to the previous three. Other years there were 3
    days jam packed full of breakout sessions, this year there were only
    2. Luckily I had signed up for 2 round table sessions on Monday or
    that day would have been a bust. Boston in the winter was not very
    appealing either. Hopefully they will go back to a warm climate again
    next year. Also the $190 plus room rate was a bit steep.
     
    Glenn Franck, Jan 26, 2004
    #4
  5. Steve Davis

    DHANNAH Guest

    John,
    I agree with you. I wish SW would take all the resources used to develop the
    new mold tools and applied them to stability and speed enhancements.
    Let R&B or I-Mold or FaceWorks do the specialty products for Mold design.
    The new tools have boomed out every time I used them on a model complex
    enough that I need them.

    SW has a lot of other issues that need fixed, not adding new mold tools.
     
    DHANNAH, Jan 27, 2004
    #5
  6. Steve Davis

    matt Guest

    Not sure why the email bounced. You removed the "_"s from it?

    Anyway, I think it was a good thing that they added the ruled surface tool.
    It has some cool ways of working which will simplify some mold and plastic
    part design tasks some day when it's more reliable. I was not a big fan of
    the tooling split done as a multi-body in the part. Tooling data needs to
    be separated from the part data.

    I read in one of the e-zine reports from SWWorld that side cores are a
    planned enhancement in SW05. This is going more deeply into partner
    territory where it might be better if they left it alone.

    I'm disappointed to hear what you said about Cholly. He used to post in
    here many moons ago before SW hired him. He's a programmer with mold
    design experience, which is rare enough. Maybe I can get a copy of his
    presentation when they post it on the web. I'd still like to see what he
    showed.

    matt






    ....
     
    matt, Jan 28, 2004
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.