SolidWorks World - What Would "Make" you Attend?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Richard Doyle, Oct 8, 2004.

  1. Richard Doyle

    MM Guest

    Malcom,

    Oops, that's right, six or seven years ago when there wasn't much to really
    talk about.

    It's closer to 100 miles.


    Mark
     
    MM, Oct 8, 2004
    #21
  2. I am not going to try to convince anyone to go. I will just share my story.



    The immediate tangible benefit of going to SWx World for me was not picking
    up a few 'tricks' or improving my 'productivity' a percent or two, though
    those might be enough if you use Richards math. At each of the first three
    SWx Worlds I went to, I got insight into how to overcome things that were
    absolute show stoppers - modeling or file management challenges that would
    have simply killed jobs or forced TONS of rework if I had not been
    introduced to how to work through them.



    It also was an introduction to a larger world then I knew before. When I
    first went, I was considered to be a 'power user' (a term I hate) which was
    why I got to go. When I got to SWx World I learned just how much of a
    neophyte I was (and still am, to be honest). There is so much you can do
    with this software, the tools that are sold to supplement it, and the access
    you have to write your own tools, that its both exciting and intimidating
    when you get introduced to them.



    Going to SWx world changed the way I think about SWx, and the way I use SWx.
    I saw lots of stuff, some of it immediately useful to me, some of it not,
    some of it even bad advice, but all of it contributed to changing the entire
    way that I approach using this software to create my designs, and the way I
    interact with other folks who I have to collaborate with.



    Finally, I learned never to be dumb enough to get caught saying that 'you
    can't do that in SWx'. I learned from SWx World that 80% of the time the
    person who says 'SWx can't do something' is flat out wrong, and another
    15-18% of the time there is a way to get around the limitation.



    Is it worth the money? Since I treated it like I was at work from 8 AM to
    10 PM and not getting a few days off to screw off at Disney, I made sure it
    was worth the money.

    I learned that if you are an active attendee, if you sit near the front and
    take notes at the breakout sessions, if you try to meet people and learn
    about their businesses and how they work, and if you share what you learn
    with the other folks in the office when you get back, the investment is
    readily recaptured. Those first few trips have easily paid for themselves
    many, many times over. I would only have trouble justifying the expense to
    someone who has been to a couple, because there is a point of diminishing
    returns on the breakout sessions if there is a lot of repetition from year
    to year (which is one of the reasons why when I give breakout sessions I try
    to keep adding material instead of giving the same old show)



    -Ed
     
    Edward T Eaton, Oct 8, 2004
    #22
  3. It would be nice if there was a way to attend through some
    sort of live virtual cyberspace setup (like webex or whatever).

    SolidWorks could charge a small fee, and I could choose
    what presentation I'd like to watch. They could be repeated
    at certain times (like a pay per view channel on cable).

    You could have chat rooms, avatars and all that geeky stuff
    so that we can talk and interact with each other.

    An employer could even reserve one of their conference
    rooms, with the big LCD projector, so that employees can
    kick-back and watch the show.

    Failing that, SolidWorks can create regional 'hot spots'
    at local hotel conference rooms around the world with
    multiple kiosks for people to attend and plug into the matrix.

    Are there any companies out there that specialize in setting
    that sort of thing up? If not, hey I just invented a niche market
    company!

    That's my idea of a no-brainer.

    Mike Wilson
     
    Mike J. Wilson, Oct 8, 2004
    #23
  4. Richard Doyle

    matt Guest

    Face it. If you're a regular poster (or lurker) here, you're well on
    your way to being a bit of a geek anyway, and probably more than a mite
    "touched" into the bargain. Geeks have some advantages normal mortals
    don't have, such as the allowance to be a bit eccentric and for that to
    be a "good thing".

    For us real geeks, there is no end of benefit you can draw from SW
    World. There are certainly all of the tips and new techniques that you
    pick up. One of my favorites was Ed E's stuff. Ed has a remarkable
    combination of knowledge of the subject matter and the ability to
    communicate it. People usually have one or the other, rarely both.

    I also found the roundtables to be possibly the most valuable thing I
    did. This put you in touch with other high level users and folks from
    SW who have influence over (or at least knowledge of) the direction the
    software is taking.

    I find the "productivity" argument for a trip to SW Workd kind of
    interesting in light of the tendency of some employers to use a trip to
    Disney as a reward for "strollers" (politically connected casual non-
    geek users with more interest in Pleasure Island than the partner
    pavilion, and who look at Model Mania as being "for geeks"). They get
    no more productivity benefit from the trip than a bag of free pens.

    There's a lot to be said for the connections you gain while there. I
    still draw on some of the people I've met at SW World. All companies
    get some value from that which is very hard to measure in dollars and
    cents. Being immersed in "SolidWorks geekdom", seeing the inspiring
    heights of what some people are capable of, new ideas and techniques,
    new products to download and try, new sources of information and
    assistance, new customers, and new drinking buddies.

    At one SW World, I was standing around trying to decide how I was going
    to get to two simultaneous events which were must-see. I turned around
    to walk away, and ran into a wall of white linen. "Are you the guy from
    the internet?" Jon Hirschtick is probably 6'4", I am 5'8" and was
    looking square into the middle of his shirt. I had never given "the
    internet" as an address before. He probably saw the shadow of a
    sarcastic response flit across my face, so he quickly introduced himself
    and correctly guessed my name. You can imagine, I was feeling more than
    a bit paranoid. In days gone by I used to be pretty ruthless railing
    against the software here in the newsgroup. I've moderated a bit in my
    old age. Anyway, Mr. H had a couple other folks with him, I think the
    head of development at the time and the quality director. It was a
    meeting that couldn't have happened anywhere but SW World.

    John McEleney is probably 5'6" and not nearly as imposing as Hirschtick.

    Anyway, all of this to say that I'm probably not going to be there again
    this year, even though as leader of a user group, I get a free ticket.


    matt
     
    matt, Oct 9, 2004
    #24

  5. Bummer, Matt. Buying you (and Ed, Paul, Mark, Mark, and a few others) a
    beverage of choice would be one of my biggest personal reasons for going.
    Not that it matters a lot, since I'm probably not going either!

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
    "take the garbage out, dear"
     
    Jerry Steiger, Oct 11, 2004
    #25

  6. Hey, Craig, she already knows I'm an idiot! I'll help write the
    justification. If we convince her to send two of us, we can share a room and
    save $121 a night.

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
    "take the garbage out, dear"
     
    Jerry Steiger, Oct 11, 2004
    #26
  7. Combining your thoughts with those of Ed Eaton, there's probably a 90%
    chance that someone who works at the sessions can pick up 1 to 5 % on their
    productivity. For the kind of work we do, I might have a 30% chance of
    learning something that will have a big impact on my productivity, say
    5-20%. Then there's perhaps a 10% chance that I can learn something that
    will pick up 20-50% on our productivity. Taking the midpoints and adding it
    all up, I end up with a likely increase in productivity of 10%. Figuring
    that only half or our time is spent working on SW, I've still got almost a
    5% likely increase in productivity. That should more than pay for the costs.

    Also don't forget that the person who learns all these nice tricks is going
    to share them with the stay-at-homes. The little stuff tends to get lost
    more easily, but the big stuff will get transferred nicely. Maybe a 3%
    increase in their productivity, multiplied by the number of stay-at-homes.
    More payoff.

    Finally, the more people who go, the more chance that we will find something
    that pays off big, less losses in translation, but at added cost and with
    less stay-at-homes to pick up productivity.

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
    "take the garbage out, dear"
     
    Jerry Steiger, Oct 11, 2004
    #27
  8. Richard Doyle

    Michael Guest

    I went last year...

    I had high hopes for the conference, but on the whole didn't find it worth
    the (time & money) cost. There were some excellent presentations, but I
    didn't see anything like the productivity increase I'd need to justify going
    again.

    I'm sure the conference is a wonderful tool for the SW developers, and helps
    them identify the directions they need to go in. As a user, however, I
    found the benefits to be marginal.
     
    Michael, Oct 12, 2004
    #28
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.