SolidWorks or VX?

http://jwstolk.xs4all.nl/millp.htm
Perhaps it's deserved <g>.l

 

Which one?

 

Very easily:

The surfacing functions that are in UG are not included in Parasolid.

Name a hybrid modeler built on Parasolid where moving between solids
and surfaces is seamless like it is in UG. It's a rhetorical
question... there isn't one available.

Why do you think developers that are interested in building hybrid
modelers choose ACIS, build their own kernel or do what Impact Soft
apparently does with the CATIA kernel rather than use Parasolid ? Maybe
you should ask them ? I have.

I'd even be happy to post a web forum link where you can ask the
developer of Concepts why he didn't go with Parasolid. I'm sure you
could also call Cadkey now Kubotek and ask them.... better yet attend
SaladWorks World and ask Paul Stallings vise president of development
for Kubotek what ACIS has in it's kernel that Parasolid is devoid of.

jon


"I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them." ... Jimmy
Hoffa

 

How would you know?
Can you tell a Kentucky kernel from kernel Saunders?
Nope.

Even if you were correct then you cannot blame the ParaSolid
kernel as you ALWAYS do.

 

evaluating says:
turnip truck jon says:

Know what a circular reference is?

Still nothing to do with corn.

No need to ask. It's obvious. You asked? Did you understand the answers?

Why would Tim trash all that experience and expertise. Autodesk should have
snagged him but, being as clueless and dishonest as you dropped the ASM scam on
their customers. You thought that was a good idea, didn't you? Yeah, yeah,
Parasolid doesn't do everything ACIS does. That's why ACIS is a better choice
for entry level and niche market applications but that's all it will ever be.
You will never see a UG built over ACIS. Turnip.

Anybody have any turnip and corn recipes?

 

Calling John S. ......