SolidWorks magazine ad - this is funny!

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Jeff N, Nov 4, 2003.

  1. Jeff N

    Jeff N Guest

    Check out the latest Desktop Engineering...
    On page 9 is a SolidWorks ad with a stick on it saying "check the
    BOM..wouldn't have happened with SolidWorks" blah blah blah.

    OK SolidWorks listen up. Yeah the BOM might have been correct and Balloons
    would have shown up, but for the love please improve your text! This is
    picky, but the dates aren't even centered.
    On the lower right part of your format the text "DO NOT SCALE DRAWING" runs
    over the format line. Now how many of you have seen this over and over where
    the text does not print out the same as it shows up on screen?
    SolidWorks, this is embarassing. Please don't rub it in my face that this is
    an issue and you care so little as to publish it all over the world.
     
    Jeff N, Nov 4, 2003
    #1
  2. I've often sat through roll-outs watching the jockey demo new "really cool -
    WOW" drawing improvements and the whole time I was focused on the piss-poor
    drawing format he/she was using. You're right it's nit-picky, but it's still
    something that sticks out like a sore thumb.

    Richard
     
    Richard Doyle, Nov 4, 2003
    #2
  3. Jeff N

    Habib Guest

    This I too felt the very same way. What they tell us? It almost make me to
    make the post about this too.

    Almost like one guy who design a car with bicaclye handbars and want we to
    get excitement.

    I read on this too and make me almost mad after to bad of the BOM looking
    and no longer can I click on baloon and get right upon to one BOM entries.

    They make to bragging on like they invent a rewinder for the DVDs (i smiles)
    it mkes about this much usefule.

    Ok you know now that others are felling these ways to-

    Sincerefully

    Habib
     
    Habib, Nov 5, 2003
    #3
  4. Jeff N

    MHill Guest

    I saw this add too and noticed some irony in it myself. The whole
    premise of the add seems flawed to me as the redlined drawing was
    clearly done in SW (any number of items indicate this). Why didn't
    they at least come up with and ACAD drawing (or MDT, Invetor, pro/e,
    unigraphics, catia, etc.)?

    If they can't even make a drawing template look good for a printed
    advetisement, how do they expect us to. The unpredictable moving text
    is EXTREMELY frustrating to me.

    That drawing is ugly, and its not even very complicated. Maybe
    putting it in an ad will get the attention of someone at SW who also
    notices the little details that make a drawing look professional.

    In my case, the ad was in design news, pg 13.
     
    MHill, Nov 5, 2003
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.