SolidWorks 2006 Bug, Deleting Configs does not change file size

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Joe Sloppy, Nov 18, 2005.

  1. Joe Sloppy

    Joe Sloppy Guest

    Just had a part with 3000 configs, deleted them and went from a 50meg
    file to a 50meg file, huh?. Closed SW and it still was 50meg file with
    one config, then I opened it and did a save as, it dropped to 1 meg,
    please fix SW, thanks. Try it out, SW2006 SP1. What did I do wrong?
     
    Joe Sloppy, Nov 18, 2005
    #1
  2. Joe Sloppy

    YouGoFirst Guest

    Nothing, I have drawings where I have deleted sheets and views, and the file
    size doesn't change. If you want to file size to change you have to save it
    as a new name.
     
    YouGoFirst, Nov 18, 2005
    #2
  3. Can you believe it's not a bug but a "normal" consequence of
    Microsoft's "Structured Storage" file format used by SW?
    Try EcoSqueeze from www.ecocom.com and you'll ask the real question :
    why isn't it embedded in SolidWorks ?
    Philippe Guglielmetti
     
    Philippe Guglielmetti, Nov 18, 2005
    #3
  4. Joe Sloppy

    WT Guest

    You didn't do anything wrong. Sw utilizes a MS type of file structure
    called a Structured Storage File, or also called a compound file, that
    is really interesting to investigate. It's like a whole folder
    structure inside the envelope of one file. When you look at one of the
    files with a Structured Storage File viewer, it's like you walked into
    a whole new room that is just filled with doors to explore.

    Anyway, when you delete stuff, and then save, SW doesn't eliminate the
    unused doors and their storage space. But it does when you do a save
    as. So you can do that, or you can use a couple programs that will do
    it for you. Unfrag is fast and easy to use, but it changes the file
    date to the current one. EcoSqueeze is also fast and easy and it gives
    you more options, such as maintain the file date. However, it also
    gives you the opportunity to do some things that maybe you shouldn't.

    Now, be advised that the official SW position is that they don't
    support anything that modifies the file structure of a SW file. But I
    (and lots of others) have been using both programs for a long time with
    no apparent problems. Your choice.

    WT
     
    WT, Nov 18, 2005
    #4
  5. Joe Sloppy

    james Guest

    Sad, but true.

    If you had any autocad experience, "save as" is the closest thing we
    have to "purge" from the old days...

    Before emailing files to clients, shops, etc., I often "save as", then
    "save as" back to the original name. It does wonders for the file
    size!

    A hassle? Yes, but effective.
     
    james, Nov 18, 2005
    #5
  6. Joe Sloppy

    Jean Marc Guest

    "WT" <> a écrit dans le message de ...
    compound file, that
    Interesting, any "Structured Storage File viewer" we can download?
    TIA
    JM
     
    Jean Marc, Nov 21, 2005
    #6
  7. Joe Sloppy

    WT Guest

    WT, Nov 21, 2005
    #7
  8. Interesting, any "Structured Storage File viewer" we can download?

    the only one I know is http://secure.codeproject.com/macro/ssfview.
    asp.
    It's a plugin for Visual Studio... but it comes with source code to
    write your own "EcoSqueeze"...
     
    Philippe Guglielmetti, Nov 21, 2005
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.