Solidity for SolidWorks?

I'll bet he was just devastated, Jonnie. Probably hasn't slept much since.

gk

 

You've been trying to smoke that Lithium again.

 

There's a Mike that now goes as as Michele in some circles.

 

Maybe because they had the skill level of Jonnie or were just too lazy
to look through the features. It is also a way to create lots of time
for your card or billable hours for you customer.

Just because they do doesn't mean they should.

Hey, you forgot Joe788 in the above rundown. You also forgot to post
the list of the "job shop engine designers" which I would still love to
see. Somehow, I don't think you will ever be able to produce the list.
No surprises there, Jonnie.

Funny Jonnie, but I am able to understand all the complex relationships
that often exist in models and assemblies. Maybe that is why I'm not
whining about it all the time.

gk

 

Is he your new "god of cadcam" (after yourself, of course)? Maybe he
hasn't heard of your "skills" yet and will ask you for an interview. I
will be watching for that one.

gk

 

I just read this Blog and I'm just devastated. I doubt I will get
much sleep now as I realize what a idiot I am.

Now it's correct Nuts son.

http://paulsalvador.blogspot.com/

"The reason why SW Corp gets away with releasing half-bake-ware:

Majority rules, 80-90% of the users come from using inexpensive,
inferior and poorly managed design tools. Most of the user base do not
fully use the tool or use very little of the functionality, thus, the
more involved functionality is typically overlooked, poorly critiqued
or supported. Majority of the users expectations on quality are very
low or the need for reliable software is average. Many of the users
come from using past tools with limited functionality, they become use
to or complacent with working around limitations. Workarounds, due to
limitations, have a "at a boy" or a accomplishment related
mentality,.. this is, it becomes an accepted part of the job when
using the software."

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

I guess that a 16 hour claimed video was not as good as knowing
things, eh? Even if it did take over 3 months to watch and cost
a LOT more than the better ones for $25.
If you had a legal version of SW perhaps you could get basic training
& support too .... LOL ...

 

Or more video games for his/her/it's gamebox computer ....

 

Is this about connecting rods again?

How do they work with only one hole in them?

 

Clueless ones full of ads, buzzwords, hype & BS I expect.

And too lazy to think. They'd rather waste time or get it wrong.

 

"You're my new "god of cadcam". I realize I'm a complete idiot when it
comes to SolidWorks and I need to worship someone who has a clue
because for sure I don't and never will. I use to worship Cliffy but
that's didn't work out because I found out that despite being the
largest poster to comp.cad.solidworks that Cliffy has never / can't
use SolidWorks. When it comes to machining, Cliffy and I are on the
same level...total idiots but unlike Cliffy I have actually used
SolidWorks so I'm hoping to be Cliffy's new "god of cadcam".

gk"

Now it's correct Nuts son.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

Just like about everybody else, he actually knows a lot more
than you do. You are not even an entry-level user. Of anything
at all.

 

Hey, you forgot Joe788 in the above rundown showing those that I love to blow.

Now it's correct Nuts son.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

IOW You cannot use it & are an idiot untrained non-user.

Free clue: things created first are usually first in the part
database record structure.

 

I recall your famed posts on buying third-party components
as the wave of the future.
Bought your points yet?

 

IOW You cannot use it & are an idiot untrained non-user.

Free clue: things created first are usually first in the part
database record structure.

 

SolidWorks is a pretty good CAM package, is it?

"I've been away from SolidWorks for almost ten years." - Aug 26 2007 by
jon_banquer

"Over ten years of Insane CADCAM Jihad ! Durka, durka, durka..."

http://www.geocities.com/banquercadcam/

HTH

 

http://www.geocities.com/banquercadcam/

 

"Funny Jon, but I am able to pretend that I understand all the complex
relationships that often exist in models and assemblies. I'm not
whining about it all the time because my Solidworks skill level sucks
and honesty is not what I'm all about. I *know* I fit the below
profile completely!"

Now it's correct Nuts son.

http://paulsalvador.blogspot.com/

"The reason why SW Corp gets away with releasing half-bake-ware:

Majority rules, 80-90% of the users come from using inexpensive,
inferior and poorly managed design tools. Most of the user base do not
fully use the tool or use very little of the functionality, thus, the
more involved functionality is typically overlooked, poorly critiqued
or supported. Majority of the users expectations on quality are very
low or the need for reliable software is average. Many of the users
come from using past tools with limited functionality, they become use
to or complacent with working around limitations. Workarounds, due to
limitations, have a "at a boy" or a accomplishment related
mentality,.. this is, it becomes an accepted part of the job when
using the software."

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

 

Good question.