short beta for 2009

Tom,
I don't think he ever got any "seat time" with any of it. Ever.
He just saw someone else's comment about something somewhere
(probably had a pretty buzzword) and copied/went from there. Same
way he gets started in the first place. Has no clue if they were right,
what it was actually about, etc. Often it's from another clueless
newbie though <G>.

You give him far too much credit.
"Seat time" indeed. He's never ever actually posted anything
AFAIK That would show him to be an actual real user (1 week plus)
of anything at all. CAD, CAM OR CAD/CAM. Or even capable of simple
MDI CNC machine macros.
WAY over his head, all of it, IMO.
He even keeps confusing CAD with CAM or CAD/CAM to this day.

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

YOU don't have a SE OR UG "VAR/Dealer".

"I've gotten a few offers for programming with Unigraphics but I don't know
anything about it." - jon banquer

"They (UG) would like to make me a VAR but I don't have the interest or the
time." - Jon Banquer

 

Often such changes are a step towards major changes in a later
release. One would not want to burden users & customers with
huge major changes all at once (and the changes/enhancements
may not all be ready anyway). Spread out the learning curve over
at least two releases, if not utterly critical.
There is also much study of user interfaces so when really
better methods for the future are discovered it does make sense
to start adding them, IMHO. And systems evolve as new features are
added & old options moved to new/better locations.

Neck whiplash with multiple monitors (and eyestrain due to different
focus distances) used to be a bit of a problem <g>.
Hence banquer needs two monitors .... latest & greatest technology ...

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

Indeed. Or any of the other latest buzzwords & greatest ads?

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

He has no idea what an engineering department does
or he lied again. Choose at least one.

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

Whoa Paul,

Read it again. I said nothing negative about Pro/E unless you think I
am comparing the two which I am not. If you say I was TOTALLY wrong in
what I said then you are saying Pro/E users were praising SW at the
time. They weren't.

I was comparing SW then with SW now.

1. At that time SW files were in general smaller than Pro/E or many
other CAD system files in general.
2. SW at that time did have a reputation for stability. Nothing there
about Pro/E not having stability.
3. SW did not require the resources that Pro/E did in that time frame.
The opposite is true now not just for Pro/E but also UG and perhaps
CATIA..
4. SW was fast. My first SW machine was a 166Mhz Pentium with 128MB of
ram and a 300MB hard drive running on NT. By 98+ I needed a 300Mhz
machine to keep up. I suspect Pro/E would beat SW in any speed test
today.

TOP

 

When they are selling as many new seats as they say they are this
doesn't matter except to loyal customers. The funny thing is that with
some of the old standby CAD systems that haven't changed much over the
years the old users just keep getting better. SW likes to throw away
that experience at regular intervals with interface changes and
functionality swapping.

TOP

 

Well, perhaps he took your advice, sort of, and begged how to find
arcs & circles in MasterCAM (posing as a "MasterCAM User").

Oops .. that's not his name, is it?
Some poor newbie .... and he asked for custom videos ...... it's
not as if he knew anything about the the basics of all CAD, CAM &/or
CAD/CAM systems ... or could look in the IGES file from Pro-E .... or
grasp what he had done .... or how to easily solve such issues himself ...

The good old days of CADDS III & "Hide the entity" <G>.
Create a line display font that's invisable .... not even needed
for poor jb.

 

You probably missed watching the $$ 16 hours worth of intro
training videos which he's still not finished AFAIK. He was going
to actually buy the much better $25 one when he did finish
the 16 hours .... not a peep.

 

What was this about? No context quoted.

 

Hey Paul,

Oh,.. my bad...hmm... ? I re-read it and I,...re-read it again...
and, still see the bash.

It's interesting to me because, in 1999 (using SW98+ on the same
computer as Pro/e),.. I actually tested, reviewed and praised SW for a
few of my clients (who were considering Pro/e), and imho (then and
now, hands down) SW was the right fit for them!
And, as a Pro/e user,.. I was happy to see the competition.

I've used them side by side and I know the difference... then/now...
Pro/e is still better over SW... or,... maybe,.. it sux less, if you
will.

.. (i'm feeling sleepy,... dave.... daisy, daisy,...

 

I gave credit, where credit was due. Don't let it get to your head Jon.

Not to worry, it's not like an ignorant, lying scumbag like Tom Brewer
will ever admit how wrong he has was (yet again) on the needed tools.

Too bad Tom Brewer can't be forced to stay with his beloved rollback
bar that he claimed was just fine. Same can be said for morons Joe 788
and Gary Knutson.

Perhaps your brain goes dead faster when you believe idiots like
Franco Folini and Matt Lombard. Even P.V. had Franco Folini figured
out from day 1. Brewer still has no clue.

ROTFLMFAO

Rumor is that Siemens has an 18 month lead with Synchronous Technology
over the competition.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

 

Still using it daily Jonboi. You really should get some training so
that you can do something productive with SW. I am sure that someone
with no training, like yourself, would have lots of problems with rolled
back features. Of course, they would also have problems with the random
editing that you propose (or at least the customer would when he found
his part changed to suit yourself rather than maintaining the design
intent). You should just throw out the whole part and whip something up
that was easy for you to machine. The part was probably designed by
some "ignorant" engineer anyway and your part would be a big improvement.

gk



As long as it does the job for me

 

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080520/nytu002.html?.v=101

"I have not seen anything as exciting and innovative as Solid Edge
with synchronous technology since the introduction of parametric
modeling in the late 80s. Solid Edge has crafted a dramatic
breakthrough by combining direct modeling, parametric modeling and a
new user interface," said Ray Kurland, president, Technicom. "Siemens
PLM Software has re-thought how users can more easily model in 3D.
Users should love the ease of building and editing models -- all
without any need to pre-plan how models might be used in the future.
Solid Edge's competitors will be scrambling for years to catch up."

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA