Sheet metal – controlling corner gap

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by skrug, Jul 26, 2004.

  1. skrug

    skrug Guest

    I don't think this is possible but I'm going to ask... Does anyone
    know a way to control the gap in corners of sheet metal parts using
    the edge flange sheet metal feature? As far as I know, the gap is
    always controlled by the inside radius. You can change the type of
    flange (material inside, material outside, bend outside) which
    controls the position of the bend but the gap is still always
    determined by the inside radius using this feature. If you use the
    miter flange feature you can control this corner gap with a
    dimensioned value (if you select multiple edges) but that doesn't give
    you options for flanges of different lengths or profiles. You can
    also control this gap using a rip feature but this uses the "old
    style" of SolidWorks sheet metal. Neither of these options seem like
    good alternatives so I'm hoping someone here knows of another.

    Steve
     
    skrug, Jul 26, 2004
    #1
  2. skrug

    kenneth b Guest

    Have the

    nope
     
    kenneth b, Jul 26, 2004
    #2
  3. Sorry I have only found that using a miter gets around this, Hardly an
    acceptable answer.maybe try adding a small miter then adding a tab to create
    the rest of your flanges. If someone has a better method I would like to
    know also. This really limits the creation of sheetmetal parts. Have the
    tools for SM been improved in 2005.

    Corey
     
    Corey Scheich, Jul 26, 2004
    #3
  4. skrug

    kenneth b Guest

    not efficient, but you can sketch the extensions inside the edge-flange
    sketch.
     
    kenneth b, Jul 26, 2004
    #4
  5. skrug

    rocheey Guest

    Model the entire part as a one-thickness, but NOT sheet metal part,
    using extrudes, etc. Stay away from shells and rips; make your own
    reliefs as 'gaps' between faces, and dont add Bends until the last
    feature. You be suprised what you can do with this (awkward) method: I
    can even model multi-body sheet metal parts, that all unfold, and with
    no errors.
     
    rocheey, Jul 26, 2004
    #5
  6. skrug

    rocheey Guest

    The edge flanges seem, by nature, not to give as tight a corner as,
    say, a shell/rip combo. but it is more flexible.

    You can get slightly more tight corners by EDITING the flange profile
    sketch.
    By editing, I mean to ERASE the one vertical line that represents the
    side of the flange and replace it with 2 lines; one that is slightly
    greater that your bend radius height, and the next line vertically
    the rest of the flange height.

    Make your small replacement line start at the same bottom position SWX
    gave you for the original edge flange profile; make it taper at
    whatever angle it has to
    to meet your new "full height" vertical line, which you can now DIM to
    a clearance value from the edge flange next to it.

    Be aware that you can get so close that the thing will no longer
    unfold;
    for a trully tight seam AND flexibility, see my other reply ( to your
    other post) about creating the part as a 'standard' solid first...
     
    rocheey, Jul 26, 2004
    #6
  7. I also think this method gives much more control in the way the part is
    built.
     
    Jean Marc BRUN, Jul 27, 2004
    #7
  8. skrug

    skrug Guest

    Richard,

    In this particular case we are creating a drawer front which has
    provedn to run very well through the shop. It has small gaps (.010)
    in the corners which don't have to be welded. One flange is formed
    inside so the mitre flange feature couldn't be used. The design was
    originally created in AutoCAD with sharp corners and unfolded with
    SPI. I created a model in SW that generates the proper flat pattern
    but required extra features. I was hoping there was a way to create
    these tight corners using the standard flange tool. I also considered
    creating the model as extrusions and inserting bends as the last
    feature but SW would not unfold/fold the part.

    Steve
     
    skrug, Jul 27, 2004
    #8
  9. skrug

    rocheey Guest

    you probably already know this. I discovered that you can take
    Well, yes, I discovered this as well, and used it; but have always
    wondered if it was bug that would someday come back to bite me ...
     
    rocheey, Jul 27, 2004
    #9
  10. Nice. I wonder why you are not offered to "link to thickness" the "thin dim"
    of a thin extrude?

    (2001+)
     
    Jean Marc BRUN, Jul 28, 2004
    #10
  11. skrug

    rocheey Guest

    I just emailed you a quick sample. See if you can get edge flanges, or
    shell/rip to do what this simple model does (and still unfold!)

    You'll notice the gap is a linked value, just change one of the "gap"
    dims in the first sketch....
     
    rocheey, Jul 28, 2004
    #11
  12. What is wrong with using mitre flange and editing the flange that is
    different you can add more bends to it or take some away. You can unfold
    and remove unwanted bends also, to do this you add an unfold feature add a
    sketch to the outside surface use the intersection curve tool to extract the
    outside edge of the flattened face and extrude to thickness. Now you can
    add the bends you want. You will have to supress the unwanted bends in
    Flat-Pattern1.

    Corey Scheich
     
    Corey Scheich, Jul 28, 2004
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.