Radial Tile

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by Rob, Nov 22, 2005.

  1. Rob

    Rob Guest

    How is everyone showing radius concrete roof tile on your elevations
    for a roof that is on a radius like a turret?
    Hatch patterns are flat & short of just drawing each tile on the roof
    is just
    very time consuming plus I would have to draw it several different
    times for
    different pitches. A lisp routine would be great but that is way
    beyond my level of expertise. Looking for an easy way to get the look
    I want but
    save time in the process.

    Any ideas?

    -Rob
     
    Rob, Nov 22, 2005
    #1
  2. Most people just hatch it and live with it.(Yuk!) I would draw it.

    I've never done in on a cone, but I have drawn clay tiles on a hips at
    angles to the page....
    It's time consuming, but it does convey the significant texture you are
    proposing with such a roof.

    It would take you longer to write the lisp than to draw it once. If you'll
    be doing it frequently, it might become worth it. You seem to know your
    options. Now it's time to choose.
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Nov 22, 2005
    #2
  3. Rob

    Peter Ruehle Guest

    I'm not into architectural, but I was wondering if the mesh command is a
    possible way to go.
     
    Peter Ruehle, Nov 25, 2005
    #3
  4. Rob

    Tim Guest

    I don't think so - but that got me thinking the Ruled Surface option would
    be a good way of laying down converging lines to indicate the curved surface

    I't not what the OP wants but it's an option

    Tim
     
    Tim, Nov 25, 2005
    #4
  5. I wouldn't use a 3d object in a 2d drawing unless I had to as it will
    probably cause all kinds of havoc as other people snap to it. The converging
    lines trick is an old hatcher's way to show a cone. In CAD I'd draw the
    circle in plan, divide it or measure it, and use that to generate the
    bottoms of each hatch line heading for the apex.
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Nov 25, 2005
    #5
  6. Rob

    gruhn Guest

    I wouldn't use a 3d object in a 2d drawing unless I had to as it will
    converging

    People shouldn't be snapping to a hatch ;-)
    Use the 3d as a setup; then explode and flatten?
     
    gruhn, Nov 30, 2005
    #6
  7. Remember: People are idiots.
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Nov 30, 2005
    #7
  8. Rob

    gruhn Guest

    Remember: People are idiots.

    Point.
     
    gruhn, Nov 30, 2005
    #8
  9. Rob

    Tim Guest

    I wouldn't use a 3d object in a 2d drawing unless I had to as it will
    I take your point but I was assuming that we are talking about a 2D drawing

    So the mesh would be a flat 2D mesh

    There is the danger that someone could pull the grips up in the Z plane but
    then that's a danger with any object

    Whenever I get a drawing acting oddly I always flip it edge on to see whats
    been going on in the Z axis

    And your point about people - Noted :)
     
    Tim, Nov 30, 2005
    #9
  10. Rob

    Mr. B Guest

    A 1-Liner I use to say this is:

    "Never Underestimate the Stupidity of People"

    Kind of what you said in a nicer way :)

    Regards,

    BruceF
     
    Mr. B, Nov 30, 2005
    #10
  11. Rob

    gruhn Guest

    "Never Underestimate the Stupidity of People"
    Don't go down the nicer path for it leads to the pit of dishonesty.
     
    gruhn, Nov 30, 2005
    #11
  12. Rob

    Rob Guest

    Several good suggestions but I don't think this is going in the direction I
    had hoped.

    I use my elevations for both presentation and construction documents.
    Therefore I need the tile represented in both places. The rest of my
    drawings represent graphically what will be built - why not the "turrets".

    The problem with drawing them is that I would have to draw one for each
    condition. I use roof pitches that range from 3:12 to 6:12 and fractions
    thereof. This could easily be 10-20 individual scenarios.

    The 3D option is out because I share my drawings with engineers and that
    would just confuse them (no offense) but they have a hard enough time with
    my ADT drawings.

    I do have a lsp file that draws a truss in elevation with the webs. You
    pick the start point, end point and give it the pitch & overhang and it
    draws it. Sometimes it requires minor cleanup but it works quick and easy.
    I could envision a routine that would operate in a sim. fashion. I realize
    it would be much more complex because you have multiple lines and angles
    based on the pitch but this would allow the drawing to represent all pitches
    of the roof and overhangs etc...

    If someone would be interested in this I would be interested in paying for
    your time (within reason) or the file itself. I am not asking for anything
    for free because this would save me time and as we all know time is money.

    Please let me know if there are any other thoughts.

    Thanks,
    -Rob
     
    Rob, Dec 12, 2005
    #12
  13. This could be done with lisp for sure, but it would be a fairly complex
    (expensive) routine for what it tries to achieve.
    If this kind of realism is what you do routinely, I'd love to see some
    drawings.
     
    Michael Bulatovich, Dec 12, 2005
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.