New to SW

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Tom Truman, Feb 16, 2005.

  1. Tom Truman

    Tom Truman Guest

    Our company is expecting to have to train a number of experienced Solid Edge
    and UG users on Solid Works soon for an upcoming project. As of yet, one
    person here has gone through some SW tutorials, but no one else has any
    experience.

    Our perception is that SW will be very easy to learn, especially for those
    with the SE background.

    The work we will be doing will involve modeling and drafting, including
    large assemblies (10,000+ components, including fasteners, etc.).

    Is there anyone here who's used both packages and can advise what things we
    will need to watch for regarding performance or interface differences? (Or
    anything else we should be aware of to ease the transition?)


    TIA,
    Tom Truman
    ORT Engineering
     
    Tom Truman, Feb 16, 2005
    #1
  2. I have never used SE, so can't address that part of. However, since I am
    particularly keen on using hotkeys to enhance productivity, I would suggest
    loading all of mine from the start. If you wish to go that route, I can send
    you a zip file that has the registry entries and documentation that list all
    that are standard in SW, and also all that we have standardized on here.
    This includes what you would normally consider hotkeys (m-mate, n-note,
    w-zoom to window, etc) and also the numeric keypad set of macros that give
    you all the different std & isometric views at the touch of a key.

    I would also suggest loading your SW application as C:\Program
    Files\SolidWorks2005\ with the common files loading as C:\Program
    Files\Common Files\Solidworks Data2005\. (Note - no space before the 2005.)
    There is more than one reason for this suggestion, and I believe in it
    enough to suggest that you uninstall and reinstall SW if you have not done
    it this way. The first is that you will be able to use more of my help, as
    in here's the file - load it. The second is that there will come the time
    that you want to upgrade a machine to the next version and still maintain a
    lesser version for customer compatibility, etc. and so you need to be able
    to keep them separate. This is what I have learned from my experience. My
    thoughts.

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, Feb 16, 2005
    #2
  3. Tom Truman

    Arlin Guest

    Arlin, Feb 16, 2005
    #3

  4. Expect SW to be very slow on large assemblies, especially on drawings.

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
    "take the garbage out, dear"
     
    Jerry Steiger, Feb 17, 2005
    #4
  5. Tom Truman

    Sporkman Guest

    ....(clip)...

    Tom, I STRONGLY recommend that UP FRONT you bring in at least one senior
    guy (a contractor if necessary) who has a lot of experience both with
    machine design AND with SolidWorks. The amount of time you will
    certainly save WILL pay you back many times over. SolidWorks is fairly
    straightforward to learn and use, but there are a number of ways that
    you can paint yourself into a corner, just like with any 3D parametric
    modeling software. There are also efficient ways to do things, and
    bumbling inefficient ways to do things, and you will not necessarily
    automatically find your way to the first group. In fact, without some
    guidance you will find that your engineers and designers end up going
    fifty dozen different ways in their design approches, and (take my word
    for it) you WILL PAY DEARLY for that.

    That being said, I recommend taking a look at the Web site of Matt
    Lombard and his Rules of Thumb. That being said, the old link to his
    site is no more, and the new link he sent me doesn't work. Email me
    directly and I can probably give you a valid email address for him.
    You'll find an email address on my Web site, or you can just unMUNGE the
    address in the header.

    Mark 'Sporky' Stapleton
    Watermark Design, LLC
    www.h2omarkdesign.com
     
    Sporkman, Feb 17, 2005
    #5
  6. Tom Truman

    Bo Guest

    As suggested by Sporky, you are jumping into a major undertaking if you
    want to start with a project to handle a product with 10,000 pieces.

    There are lots and lots of techniques to make large assemblies work
    faster and better and you can search back in this newsgroup for some of
    them.

    1. How to use subassemblies to best effect
    2. Using a dumb solid in place of a large subassembly in a larger
    assembly.
    3. To use or not use fasteners in some assemblies, and how to use and
    organize those fasteners and whether or not to use ToolBox.
    4. SolidWorks settings to improve performance with large assemblies
    5. PDM

    Buying the advice from someone who paid the price the hard way could
    save you weeks or months of time as has been suggested.

    Bo
     
    Bo, Feb 17, 2005
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.