New Machine for sw2006

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by St, May 13, 2006.

  1. St

    St Guest

    Looking for a new machine to run 2006 version of SW..
    The questions at hand are??

    Are dual core processors worth the extra money? Does the 32 bit version Use
    them? We are looking at the 64 bit version but not yet as no machine we have
    can run it as yet..

    Memory? 1GB.. 2GB...4GB.. Currently running at 1GB. Most of the time it
    seems to be enough, but... there are times..

    VIdeo? Nvida is the prefered card here... but which model? I know as much
    as I can spend... well maybe be able to get 1200 or so out of the money
    guys...

    So far looking at:
    AMD 64
    ASUS A8N????
    2GB
    Nvidia [Quadro FX 1300 /1400]

    Anyone?

    stu
     
    St, May 13, 2006
    #1
  2. St

    Bo Guest

    Lots of threads over the last 30 days have discussed this question, if
    you just click "back in time".

    In some ways, it might be worth considering a moderately powerful
    machine and wait for the 64 bit and dual core machines until we are out
    of the beta stages with SolidWorks cleanly supporting both.

    Bo
     
    Bo, May 13, 2006
    #2
  3. St

    St Guest

    Sorry but where/what is a 'back in time' button... using offline reader...
    ;)
     
    St, May 13, 2006
    #3
  4. St

    TOP Guest

    TOP, May 13, 2006
    #4
  5. St

    Bo Guest

    Indeed, I didn't think about using a reader, and the real name of the
    button is "Older" when in Google.

    Bo
     
    Bo, May 13, 2006
    #5
  6. St

    deimos Guest

    Are dual core processors worth the extra money? Does the 32 bit version Use
    Apps need to be properly threaded to take advantage of dual cores. SW
    for the most part is a single threaded app. 32 versus 64 is a lesser
    issue as 32-bit CPU's have topped out and you basically get a 64-bit
    processor due to the higher clock speeds. And as long as you've got it,
    might as well use the 64-bit compiled version instead.

    The only choice left is between a normal or HT core (Athlon 64, P4E) or
    the dual core version (Athlon X2, Pentium D/Core 2). In most
    circumstances the added cost is not worth it unless you need the
    workstation for rendering as well.
    2GB seems to be a cost effective sweet spot now. Depends on your
    assembly sizes though.
    Don't worry about getting a Quadro, the GF6 GPU's do just as well and
    the larger amounts of RAM rarely lead to performance increases. The
    only disadvantage is certified driver sets. You'll get the stability
    you'd expect from certified drivers, but not extra Quadro only features
    like real time shaders.
    You're all set; shucks, you didn't need us after all? :)
     
    deimos, May 13, 2006
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.