New Gaming Rig gives Sizzling SW2005 Performance

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by sales, Jun 4, 2005.

  1. sales

    sales Guest

    My computer caught on fire the other day while playing one of my
    favorite games, Delta Force - Typhoon Rising. I was now forced to buy
    a new motherboard, processor, memory and video cards.

    Since I do CAD and love to play these 3D processor intensive games, I
    opted for some pretty fancy hardware as follows:

    · Gigabyte NF4 Ga-K8nxp-SLI compatible Motherboard
    · 2 Gigabyte| 6800GT Gv-Nx68t256dh Video Accelerators
    · AMD64 |4000+ Athlon 64 939p CPU
    · 4gb| Pc3200 Ram

    Needless to say my gaming performance is nothing short of spectacular.
    The pleasant unintended consequence was the Solidworks performance I am
    now getting.

    I can now take super complex models and rotate like crazy. OpenGl
    performance is unbelievable. Photoworks just rips through the most
    complex rendering jobs. Stability has improved almost 100% (This might
    have something to do with 4GB of RAM)

    The key to all this I think is the SLI array of not one, but two video
    cards working in tandem. I am so pleased with SW performance that I
    feel almost bad now about complaining previously about flaky
    performance. My computer takes 12 seconds to boot up to the desktop
    now!

    I feel justified now in spending all this money on a gaming rig just
    because of the added SW performance.

    So for all of you Roller Coaster Tycoon, Halo, Battlefield 1942 and Far
    Cry freaks out there, maybe its time to upgrade.
     
    sales, Jun 4, 2005
    #1
  2. sales

    TOP Guest

    Funny you should mention your system catching fire. I overheated my RAM
    the other day running FEA. Seems like SW will overheat a CPU while FEA
    will toast RAM and hard drives.
     
    TOP, Jun 4, 2005
    #2
  3. Awesome!
    How about a "ship in the bottle" benchmark test?

    Best Regards,
    Devon T. Sowell
    www.3-ddesignsolutions.com


    My computer caught on fire the other day while playing one of my
    favorite games, Delta Force - Typhoon Rising. I was now forced to buy
    a new motherboard, processor, memory and video cards.

    Since I do CAD and love to play these 3D processor intensive games, I
    opted for some pretty fancy hardware as follows:

    · Gigabyte NF4 Ga-K8nxp-SLI compatible Motherboard
    · 2 Gigabyte| 6800GT Gv-Nx68t256dh Video Accelerators
    · AMD64 |4000+ Athlon 64 939p CPU
    · 4gb| Pc3200 Ram

    Needless to say my gaming performance is nothing short of spectacular.
    The pleasant unintended consequence was the Solidworks performance I am
    now getting.

    I can now take super complex models and rotate like crazy. OpenGl
    performance is unbelievable. Photoworks just rips through the most
    complex rendering jobs. Stability has improved almost 100% (This might
    have something to do with 4GB of RAM)

    The key to all this I think is the SLI array of not one, but two video
    cards working in tandem. I am so pleased with SW performance that I
    feel almost bad now about complaining previously about flaky
    performance. My computer takes 12 seconds to boot up to the desktop
    now!

    I feel justified now in spending all this money on a gaming rig just
    because of the added SW performance.

    So for all of you Roller Coaster Tycoon, Halo, Battlefield 1942 and Far
    Cry freaks out there, maybe its time to upgrade.
     
    Devon T. Sowell, Jun 4, 2005
    #3
  4. sales

    sales Guest

    Report to Client...

    When beam subjected to force A, Beam will start to burn!
     
    sales, Jun 4, 2005
    #4
  5. sales

    sales Guest

    What is a "ship in the bottle" benchmark test?
     
    sales, Jun 4, 2005
    #5
  6. sales

    TOP Guest

    Search for Ship in a Bottle on this NG.

    Also try STAR2.1 which you will find on the SW discussion forum. In
    place of STAR you could also run BoxTree which you will find on the NG.


    Here are the main benchmarks:

    1. Ship in a Bottle (Regen and graphics)
    2. SPECapc from SPEC.org (graphics)
    3. STAR (CPU test)
    4. PATBENCH (IO test)
     
    TOP, Jun 4, 2005
    #6
  7. sales

    TOP Guest

    TOP, Jun 4, 2005
    #7
  8. sales

    sales Guest

    OK. Ship in a bottle I was able to run in 28.5 seconds. Is this a good
    time?

    CPU
    AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 4000+
    Manufacturer AMD
    Family AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 4000+
    Architecture 64-bit


    Dual SLI NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Series GPU Driver 7.1.8.9

    4GB DDR400 RAM
     
    sales, Jun 5, 2005
    #8
  9. sales

    TOP Guest

    Yup. If you change your options for shaded mode to fast you should be
    able to get down to 18 seconds. To my knowledge there haven't been any
    Intel systems that can touch 28. Did you get a chance to try any of
    the others?
     
    TOP, Jun 5, 2005
    #9
  10. sales

    sales Guest

    I ran the benchmarks and here are the results. Are these good or bad?

    PatBench 6.6 seconds




    SPECapc

    **** Overall Test Results ****
    Note: All results are in seconds.
    Lower scores are better.

    Test Number 1
    Test Total = 473.49
    Graphics = 108.59
    CPU = 176.03
    I/O = 188.87

    Test Number 2
    Test Total = 444.34
    Graphics = 109.68
    CPU = 178.54
    I/O = 156.12

    Test Number 3
    Test Total = 443.95
    Graphics = 110.74
    CPU = 176.57
    I/O = 156.64

    Test Number 4
    Test Total = 444.13
    Graphics = 109.86
    CPU = 175.41
    I/O = 158.86

    Test Number 5
    Test Total = 442.9
    Graphics = 107.74
    CPU = 176.85
    I/O = 158.31

    Test Averages for 5 tests(s).
    Test Total = 449.76
    Graphics = 109.32
    CPU = 176.68
    I/O = 163.76
     
    sales, Jun 5, 2005
    #10
  11. sales

    TOP Guest

    TOP, Jun 5, 2005
    #11
  12. sales

    haulin79 Guest

    Your setup is sweet, what kind of hard drives are you running? Just
    imagine, in a couple months when the X2 dual-cores become readily
    avalable, you'll be able to upgrade using the same motherboard (unlike
    if you had an Intel rig)!
     
    haulin79, Jun 6, 2005
    #12
  13. sales

    TOP Guest

    But what benefit to SW?
     
    TOP, Jun 6, 2005
    #13
  14. sales

    Jason Guest

    I believe I heard that sw2006 will take advantage of multi processors
    and dual core for drawing regeneration of large assemblies when fully
    resolving lightweight.

    And of course Photoworks benefits.

    Hopefully we'll see more in future versions, seems a given considering
    that ghz won't be increasing much anymore and multi cores on the
    processor will be the future.

    Can anyone think of tasks in Solidworks that be could done in the
    background thus ustilizing multi processors?
     
    Jason, Jun 6, 2005
    #14
  15. sales

    haulin79 Guest

    In addition to multicore optimizations in the future releases, most
    designers/engineers do not only use SolidWorks. Throw in a sprinkle of
    PDM, ERP, Geomagic, MathWorks, PhotoShop, your favorite CFD or FEA
    package and you'll have a dual-core at 100% utilization in no time.
     
    haulin79, Jun 7, 2005
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.