Need some advanced surfacing tricks

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Joel Moore, Jan 5, 2004.

  1. Joel Moore

    Joel Moore Guest

    I'm trying to remove some fillets from a complicated imported part that
    we're making a mold for. We don't have FeatureWorks (not that it'd work on
    a part like this) and we really can't ask the customer to do it at this
    point. Here's an example of what I'm talking about:

    http://www2.primushost.com/~jlmoore/images/Fillets.jpg

    The fillets highlighted green are the type of thing I'm trying to remove.

    I'm looking for suggestions from people who may have gone through this
    already. I know how to use the surfacing tools in SW but to me this seems
    like something it can't handle too well.

    Thanks for any advice,

    Joel Moore
     
    Joel Moore, Jan 5, 2004
    #1
  2. Joel Moore

    Sporkman Guest

    Can you try importing the file to Rhino3D and doing the work there? It
    really does surfacing much better than Solidworks.

    'Sporky'
     
    Sporkman, Jan 5, 2004
    #2
  3. Joel Moore

    Joel Moore Guest

    I had an eval of Rhino installed for a while but once we got SW 2004 I
    stopped using it. I pretty much only used Rhino for untrimming surfaces
    and now SW does that.

    In general, Rhino frustrated the hell out of me so I never got too deep
    into it. Maybe I'll put some more effort into it once I have the time.
     
    Joel Moore, Jan 5, 2004
    #3
  4. Joel Moore

    Steve Tietz Guest

    seems to me that you would not need to use surfaces but then again I hardly
    ever use surfaces but you might just draw a box where the vertical edges are
    pierced to the tangent points of the fillet -- then use one tangent edge as
    a sweep path & the other tangent edge as a guide curve. You will probably
    have to create separate sketches for your path & guide curve by creating two
    3d sketches & converting edges.

    good luck

    Steve Tietz
     
    Steve Tietz, Jan 5, 2004
    #4
  5. Joel Moore

    Steve Tietz Guest

    oop I just had another look at the image -- a box probably will not work
    since the vertical edge would not match the curvature of that front face...
    sorry

    so you might try using offset surfaces with values of 0
    then untrim all surfaces
    & extend up to surfaces to get the edge to meet
    then Knit all surfaces together

    then try making those surfaces closed by offsetting & trimming with the
    fillet & solidifying those surface & Join the solids
    or just create the corner as surfaces & extrude a solid shape upto that
    surface.

    maybe that will help?

    Hard to know without having the actual model
    Steve Tietz
     
    Steve Tietz, Jan 5, 2004
    #5
  6. Joel,

    So, deleting the blends and extending the faces and trimming does not
    work?
    Anyhow, try and delete the green highlighted blends and extend the
    boundaries and trim.
    Or, if it is faster, instead of deleting the blends, copy offset "0" the
    faces you need and and extend them and trim/blend.
    There are other ways you can also approach it if the surfaces are not
    behaving but it means rebuilding those faces, such as, fill surface or
    lofting.

    Good luck.

    ...
     
    Paul Salvador, Jan 6, 2004
    #6
  7. Joel Moore

    matt Guest

    First make sure you do a Tools, Check on the geometry, with validation
    turned on. Next, I would run an import diagnosis, and ask it to
    improve
    the geometry. You can also use import diagnosis to remove faces, but I
    would do that with the feature based tools, because diagnosis leaves no
    history of what you did or way to undo it other than reimport.

    Are you having problems deleting the faces or closing the gaps? Have
    you tried to delete all the faces of the fillet and let SW close the
    gaps on the solid (without leaving it a surface model) automatically?

    http://users.adelphia.net/~mjlombard/filletsmatt.jpg

    If you have to do this manually, the section where the smaller fillet
    runs into the flat face (blue arrow) will need to be trimmed square
    before it will knit solid. That combined with the fact that the edge
    that feathers into the smaller fillet (red arrow) is likely to create
    some very nasty small edges will give you some challenges. You may
    need
    to construct a new surface in this area instead of trying to extend the
    green arrow face. The new surface will need to be an extension of the
    face indicated by the black arrow, or it may be easier to delete the
    black arrow face and just recreate it altogether, and trim it with the
    flat face with the hole on it.

    The larger fillet looks fairly easy from this distance.

    If you get really desparate, email the part. It may take some
    swearing,
    but I think this can be done.

    matt
     
    matt, Jan 6, 2004
    #7
  8. Joel Moore

    TheTick Guest

    If the model is solid or there are no gaps on the fillet edges, remove
    the fillet faces using "Delete Faces". This will allow the adjacent
    surfaces to grow back together. Then apply a matching fillet in SW
    (be sure to save a backup copy to measure).

    You will need to experiment to see how many faces you can delete at
    once. Usually deleting an entire continuous face set works well.
     
    TheTick, Jan 6, 2004
    #8
  9. if you knit the faces and have a good import you can also insert a thicken
    feature to make it a solid and then do the same thing The Tick suggested

    Corey
     
    Corey Scheich, Jan 6, 2004
    #9
  10. Joel Moore

    Joel Moore Guest

    Thanks everyone for the replies. Most of what you're saying agrees with
    how I figured I'd have to approach it.

    Part of the problem is that the original import wasn't able to form a solid
    due to several translation problems (the customer is using IDEAS).

    So I essentially just peeled apart the model using the surface offset (0
    offset) feature and exported the various sections into new models that
    represented the various pieces of the mold. So the result is that none of
    these fillets are solid.

    I guess the thing that started driving me nuts is realizing that a surface
    can't be extended up to or trimmed to itself. So replacing those missing
    fillets requires a lot of face duplication at the least.

    But at least I see now that this is pretty much the way to do it.

    Thanks for the advice.

    Joel Moore
     
    Joel Moore, Jan 6, 2004
    #10
  11. I guess the thing that started driving me nuts is realizing that a surface
    Not even with surface>untrim? I have had great luck with that, but I think
    it has to be a BREP model (untrim modifies the boundary exposing the full,
    untrimmed surface)
     
    Edward T Eaton, Jan 6, 2004
    #11
  12. Joel Moore

    Sporkman Guest

    Joel, something you said here made me realize there's a trick that may
    help you. In importing your file from IDEAS select Options (from the
    bottom right of the "Open" dialog box) and select the radio button that
    says "Do not knit". Doing so will import your surfaces separately so
    that they CAN be knit later. If you don't select this option you get a
    single COMPOSITE already-knit surface that cannot be knit to itself
    (when you try to use the Knit command).

    Mark 'Sporky' Stapleton
    Charlotte, NC
     
    Sporkman, Jan 6, 2004
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.