NCVHDL code coverage analysis:doubt

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by srj, Mar 27, 2006.

  1. srj

    srj Guest

    My doubt is regarding the code coverage analysis during a regression
    run.

    I am using NCVHDL 5.4 . I have got around 30 testcases.
    I have read about some option called "merging" .

    So is it like, for each of the 30 testcases run, i should store the
    coverage reports in seperate files(in my case there will be 30) and in
    the end i should merge these 30 files??

    I want to know whether my idea is correct or not. plz help...
    Thanks in advance
     
    srj, Mar 27, 2006
    #1
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. How to get dc operating point data from a swept dc analysis or aparametric dc analysis in ocean

  2. OrCad 10.0 - Failed to invoke "ncvhdl..." on Board Simulation

  3. Testing Code Coverage of a SKILL Program

  4. Doubt in the code

  5. DC analysis gain differs from AC analysis gain

  6. Help File Coverage; 95%, 99% or?

  7. Autodesk AU & GIS UC news coverage

  8. autodesk AU news coverage to kick off

Loading...