NCSIM *.fsdb dump vs *.shm dump

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by eda_employee, Nov 6, 2005.

  1. eda_employee

    eda_employee Guest

    For a large mixed-language (VHDL-93, Verilog-2001) SoC design,
    I've noticed that dumping the entire testbench hieararchy (from top)
    seems to take a very long time (surprise surprise...)

    But there is a large performance difference between dumping a
    Debussy-compatible database (*.fsdb) and Signalscan/Simvision (*.shm)
    If I use NCSIM's built-in $shm_open/$shm_probe, the simulation runs
    much faster. Is this what everyone else is seeing?

    (I'm guessing that shm-output uses NCSIM's internal-routines, and
    aren't bottlenecked by the PLI/VPI external-interface.)
     
    eda_employee, Nov 6, 2005
    #1
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.