Moving Assemblies with Split parts - When are they going to fix this?

Just gave a client a job that had a few split parts.
Used SW Explorer like a good user should, to copy all assys, parts and
(hurrah finally) - drawings.
Client opened up job - no split parts.At this point, I kind of guessed this
was the start of a lot of grief for the next few hours.

Split Parts not opening because they lost references back to parent.
Drawings of split parts not opening because they lost references back to
parent part.

When oohhh when, will this get freaking sorted.

 

The key to using SW is not to know all the features but to know which
features not to use.

TOP

 

Was that a rhetorical question? 8^/

Spoon boy: Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible.
Instead... only try to realize the truth.
Neo: What truth?
Spoon boy: There is no spoon.
Neo: There is no spoon?
Spoon boy: Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is
only yourself.

...

 

I am getting a bit tired and sore from bending over and taking it
though...............

 

Well it alll seems perfectly reasonable...

You've been half assed for a half ass program

 

Nev,

First of all, can you please make sure that you submit this to your
VAR as a bug. Second, what should work as a work-around to Explorer is
to use Pack N' Go from the top level assembly?

Regards

Mark

 

Probably he's just sick of doing that.
Probably he thinks by sp4 it should just work...
Most probably he is just one of thousands who have the same view.
How hard is it for you guys to get the message about quality.
You hear this over and over and over but you do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

 

Hmm,... did you guys fix the Pack N' Go bug/regression or whatever we
now call broken?

...

 

Mark,
I AM USING Pack and Go !! It Does Not Work!
There are 2 parts each with a split at end of FM. In each case this has
created 2 split parts (4 in total)
These 4 split parts each have a drawing associated.

Pack and go bypasses any split part and it's drawings.
This assembly is fairly simple having only 5 or 6 unique parts.
Not to put to finer point on it - this should be basic functionality. This
sort of thing makes the contractor that they pay good money for (ie me!)
look a bit stupid - this is what really ticks me off the most.

 

Nev, just trying to take care of this so forgive me for the basic
questions: are the split parts part of the the assembly that you've
pack n' go?

I asked because I just tried this on my SP4 and could not reproduce
your problem. Can you be more specific about how you structured your
assembly?

Pack n' Go only references parts and drawings that are part of the
assembly or part. If a part is split off from the master part but not
part of the assembly, then it, by design, will not include it. The
exception to this is drawings.

Here's what I did, and perhaps because it is simple it works, that's
why it would be good to get your files.

1) created master part and split sketch and split it out into 4
separate split part files.
2) reassemblied the 4 split parts into assembly.
3) made drawings from two of the split parts.
4) pack-n-go the assembly (including drawings)
5) results of this are in a pack-n-go folder. If you email me at
I can send you the example.

Nev, it would probably be best to get your example so I can have the
developers look at it.

Regards

Mark

 

Files sent to your email address.
--
Neville Williams
Z-Axis Design - NZ
"remove the KNOT to reply"

" A common mistake that people make when
trying to design something completely foolproof,
is to underestimate the ingenuity of the complete fool." - ANON

 

Nev,

As we've been communicating via email, there is not a problem with
Pack N' Go but rather it is working as design. I would encourage you
and others to put in an enhancement request to extend its capabilites
to optionally included all derived parts that are not part of the
assembly that you're packing up.

As I'm sure you agree, this needs to be an option (off by default)
that the user specifies, since designers usually want to capture all
the needed parts for an assembly (and drawings) but not necessarily
parts that have been derived from parts in that assembly that perhaps
pertain to other design assemblies.

Regards

Mark