Mirrored Components

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Corey Scheich, Sep 8, 2003.

  1. Why is it that this never recreates the mates that I want. I don't know how
    it works when you actually need mirrored components but alot of the time I
    have instanced mirrors. Any part that is mirrored has absolutely no mates
    attached to it. Not even between the parts that are within the mirror.
    Surely atleast the mates between them should carry over. Does anyone know
    if it ever actually reattaches the mates.

    Corey
     
    Corey Scheich, Sep 8, 2003
    #1
  2. Corey Scheich

    Jeff N Guest

    I don't have an answer, but at least your parts aren't skewing when they
    mirror. Mine are imported and often get thrown off by a fraction of a degree
    and sometimes get oriented in some bizarre fashion. And yes I have an SPR
    assigned and no I am not holding my breath. I believe it only recreates mate
    between the mirrored components themselved. It doesn't create mates between
    mirrored components and components that were already there.
     
    Jeff N, Sep 9, 2003
    #2
  3. When mirroring instances I can't even get it to do this.
     
    Corey Scheich, Sep 9, 2003
    #3
  4. if you think about it, it is a very difficult problem to mirror the mates in
    a general case.
    Do you know if other cads (Pro/E...) can mirror sub-assemblies and mate them
    correctly?
     
    Philippe Guglielmetti, Sep 9, 2003
    #4
  5. Corey Scheich

    JJ Guest

    No, it's not perfect. Yes, in many cases you are better off not trying to
    have it recreate the mates. But, in some cases it gets most or all of the
    mates which can save a lot of time. The new mate reattachment makes it
    pretty simple to fix the ones that didn't come through.

    Are you suggesting that they completely remove the option to reattach the
    mates even though it is not 100%?

    JJ
     
    JJ, Sep 9, 2003
    #5
  6. Corey Scheich

    JJ Guest

    Whoops! That last line should have read "... just because it is not 100%?".

    On second thought, I probably should not have posted it at all because it
    sounds antagonistic which it was not meant to be. Everyone has the right to
    gripe and vent. It just irks me when I think someone is going to push for
    removal of functionality that I find useful.

    JJ
     
    JJ, Sep 9, 2003
    #6
  7. Naaah, I wouldn't say to have it removed if it works atleast sometimes. I
    don't think it has ever worked for me so I am quite disapointed. I am sure
    everyone understands that. I guess I am just pushing for it to function
    more consistently.

    Corey
     
    Corey Scheich, Sep 9, 2003
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.