Microsoft Cloud

Will destroy intellectual property rights by denying you access to a
CPU or a Personal computer that will allow you to run applicaitons off
line. You won't have any privacy to develop schematics, blueprints,
manage invetions, devices, and believe me, anything of military
interest is most likely going to be hacked and patented before you can
move.

 

Will destroy intellectual property rights by denying you access to a
CPU or a Personal computer that will allow you to run applicaitons off
line. You won't have any privacy to develop schematics, blueprints,
manage invetions, devices, and believe me, anything of military
interest is most likely going to be hacked and patented before you can
move.

This is the more-than-10-year-old idea of Sun and a consortium of PC and system designers who wanted to revolutionize the PC by making it cheaper, smaller, less memory and resource intensive and network based. It was to be called the NetPC and be something like the Asus eee 1000, only with few locally stored apps, most loaded from a high speed network as if from a hard drive. Now, Google's taken up the banner, so there's some hope for success, since it already has a few of these simple apps online for free use. Along comes MS to commercialize it, license it and dominate it, but playing catch up, as usual. A word to the wise, join Google!?! Or are they just the next new meddling bad guys! Meanwhile, Sun's got JAVA everywhere and the NetPC never got off the ground, for all the happy, positive, opptimistic, forward-looking talk "challenging" Microsoft (like the chest-beating of professional wrestlers?) Dire predictions of the loss of privacy, security, integrity aside, Azure has a long row to hoe to become a reality. And its consequence for apps such as Pro/e would be negligible as this data would be transmitted only in some key encrypted format.

David Janes

 

We already have JAVA and Applets. If you don't like the format, or
you don't like the applications, it's probably because of the
potential security risk. If all of you data, is online only, how can
you access anything you have proprietary rights to, without paying
them for the service first? A home computer, you have it if you can
afford it. There is freeware. AbiWord, Gnumeric, all of the basic
office applications are out there and free. They operate on many
different operating systems. Does the Economy look stable too you?
What if your business relied upon doing things the way Microsoft
already does? When we went from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95, It was
backwards compatable. But, 98 to XP is not backwards compatable. In
order to run the same applications, you have to buy a whole new
computer. Windows 3.1 was loaded via 3.5 inch disks, then you needed
a computer that would boot from the CDROM, now you need a computer
that will boot from a DVD. The next generation of Operating Systems
would either fit on a thumb-drive, and boot from a thumb, or you have
no security. Already, we don't have the backwards compatibility.
That enables software authors to re-sell the same software only after
recompiling the very same source code with a new compiler. They don't
like the used book store selling official copies that were sold, but
they want a constant flow of money coming too them. It's less
business in fact, less user friendly, and when you push your
applications clear out to some internet server, your subscription runs
out, whereas you could own your applications. You don't need internet
access to use a home computer, and the computer doesn't have to be
hooked up to the internet to work. Everyone likes to make it seem
that way, or treat it that way.

Programmers, can't be all of that. Simply, they do shotty work, it's
not a finished program, and they plan on making a job of finishing the
programs that they write one little patch at a time, over actually
working the bugs out before selling it. Microsoft has become a real
coporation. But, they are not the power company, and want to be in
the same place in every home as the power company. They want a
monthly payment out of you for using the software, and were you may
only pay 100 dollars for an operating system now, the billing for
services would by far reach well beyond that. If it adds 20 dollars
to your internet services, in 12 months you will have paid 240 dollars
for your software, and next year, you will pay just as much. The way
they want to put it, you never finish paying for the software, and the
other modifications that require hardware modifications are not
working for them. They can make you buy the same software again.
But, by putting on the internet servers that way, they can charge you
allot more, another 20 bucks a month for storage space. When you read
the contracts the people write, they have the right to change their
service agreements, billing and payment schemes, just like the fucking
credit card companies. You think it's better? I don't.

It should boot straight out of a thumbdrive, and if you own one,
you've got one. It's a thumb drive you cannot write to, and the
operating system doesn't allow you to read directly from it, unless
you are the CPU, looking for the Operating System. The one socket
system for Operating Systems beats it because, you pay for it once.

 

Here's the facts dude. I figured out an algorithm that allows a
computer to proof read any and all programs. But, for it to work it
has to include a decompiler that decompiles every single program that
appears on the hard drive, and or any other portable means provided by
any form of media. The OS is written around the compiler/decompiler.
The programming language is very simple it's a hybrid of Fortran and
Boolean Logic Gates. Other than math functions, there are only seven
symbols for the programmer to recognize.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_gate#Symbols

With that, the computer can track variables and strings, even diagnose
truth tables of any given program and determine if it is a driver,
application or a game. There is no way to build spyware, viruses, or
adware. There is no reason for anti-virus software with a list of
viruses that at this point in time is around 60,000 known computer
viruses. All it does is check the code to insure that it came from
the compiler. Compilers have a section of binary code that they
output for every command in English or symbols that is sent to the
disk in binary as the executable file. Decompiling it, allows a
computer to actually build a truth table, and it can check for mouse
clicks, graphic user interfaces, and associations of these in such
manner as to define if the program is under the Users control.

The absolute best computer scientists already know that this language
has the potential of being the fastest executed, and easier to use the
C or Visual Basic because, it can use machine code and assembly
language macros that execute the fastest built from assembly language,
added to compiler and decompiler as components. In Visual Basic, that
would be an object in your library. As long as the decompiler can
track data, and recognize function, then it can refuse to run any
program that isn't written by the compiler based upon the OS requiring
a confirmation from the decompiler/simulator.

Your programming window would look just like this:
http://www.digital-simulator.de/

Very Similar to LabView:
http://www.ni.com/labview86/?metc=mtnazb

It's based upon the Algebra of Sets, and there are data sets,
instruction sets, and result sets that are all faithfully represented
by ones and zeros in a fashion of presence and direction within the
program. It works more like a flow chart, and it is not anywhere as
difficult to learn as Basic.
http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=166379


The really cool part, you can eliminate unneeded code from your
source, and produce the fastest possible running program every time.
There are a series of logic gate reduction algorithms available from
De Morgan's Theorem on, and the process has been automated in software
more than one time. If you wanted to put encryption between the
decompiler and the truth tables, you'd make all allot harder. That
means that Proprietary software has a problem with being decompiled to
be deciphered for function and feature to insure that it isn't a
Trojan, carrying a virus, spyware, or adware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minilog

Yes, it's all doable, and if you looked into the CPU, Math Function
list, MMX and other extended features, you'd see that there is a way
to do things much much faster with the same CPU you already have.