Mate Corruption

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Jeff, May 18, 2004.

  1. Jeff

    Jeff Guest

    We have a user who does some design work for one of our remote R&D
    facilities via our company intranet. After migrating to SW2004, he
    began to experience over-defined mates on assemblies. Thinking it was
    something that one of the remote location users had done, he proceeded
    to fix the mates. A few days later, the remote branch calls up and
    says "Why haven't you fixed those mates? We just opened up Assembly X,
    and they're still there." After numerous phone calls confirming that
    nobody at that location is accessing files, and repeated fixes, this
    is still occuring. Here is what we know so far:

    1. We are using 100% identical SW settings on each end.
    2. Corruption still appears if the files our saved within our LAN,
    and never transferred via intranet.
    3. Corruption still appears if the file is saved to local hard
    drives (on any machine).
    4. There is no set time for the corruption to occur. It might not
    happen for a week, a day, or an hour.
    5. It only happens on files involving this remote branch. On
    average, we generate a gigabyte of new SWX files per week, and none of
    our internal files are showing the same signs of corruption.
    6. The user is very proficient with SolidWorks.

    Does anyone have any idea what we might have overlooked? I'm leaning
    toward some level of corruption within the files that occured at the
    remote location.

    Thanks,

    Jeff
     
    Jeff, May 18, 2004
    #1
  2. Jeff

    neil Guest

    this probably isn't helpful but..while working with 2004 I have had angle
    mates spontaneously flip out and cause problems -that is the assy then
    becomes over defined somewhere. any of those used?
     
    neil, May 18, 2004
    #2
  3. Is the remote location maybe on SP3.0 and you are on 2.1? We have seen a
    difference there in that 3.0 will "cherry" a mate that 2.1 will ignore.

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, May 18, 2004
    #3
  4. Jeff

    matt Guest

    (Jeff) wrote in


    Have the people at the remote location open the assemblies until they see
    an error, then check File, Find References to see if all the parts are
    being referenced from the expected location. A possible cause is that it's
    getting old versions of parts or subassemblies, which would explain it
    without require some massive undetected bug or a supernatural act.

    matt
     
    matt, May 18, 2004
    #4
  5. Did this ever go anywhere? Resolved? If so, what was the answer?

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, May 27, 2004
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.