Making a Feature Follow a Drafted Surface

Discussion in 'Pro/Engineer & Creo Elements/Pro' started by Sierevello, Nov 1, 2006.

  1. Sierevello

    Sierevello Guest

    I am new to Pro E and have box with the sides drafted 10 degrees. I
    have also shelled the inside of the box. I need to add four tabs to the
    top of the box for attachment points. I have tried sketching on the top
    of the box and extruding after shelling and drafting and it will not
    follow the angle of the draft. It is 90 degrees from the top straight
    down when I extrude it. If I try to draw the tabs with the box
    undrafted and then draft the box it drafts the tabs, but when I shell
    it shells everything and the tabs must remain solid. This is driving me
    crazy!!!

    Any help greatly appreciated.

    Thanks, Steve
     
    Sierevello, Nov 1, 2006
    #1
  2. Sierevello

    Jeff Howard Guest

    Am I misunderstanding? If you want the tabs to be co-planar with or parallel to
    the drafted sides why are you extruding from a plane that is not perpendicular
    to the drafted sides?

    The problem is, one would think, quite simple. Communicating it or the solution
    verbally may be more difficult. You might try posting the model to
    mcadcentral.com (scads of fellow newbies) and asking someone to explain or show
    you how to go about it if above doesn't solve the riddle.

    (Just for the record; is 'new to pro/e' an understatement? If you are 'new to
    solid modeling' say so and help those that would offer assistance put things in
    perspective.)
     
    Jeff Howard, Nov 1, 2006
    #2
  3. Sierevello

    David Janes Guest

    I might have shared your problem, Jeff. By the time I'd read the question
    through 3 times, I had about 6 different pictures of the model and modelling
    problem. ( I'm still in favor of comp.cad.pro-e as a binary NG ~ absolutely
    incredible that we vainly try to communicate [mostly quite lamely] visual
    problems with words while we have no poets, no wordsmisths who could do a
    more credible job. Guys., we've tackled a singularity: the verbally
    impossible picture; the visually impossible words ~ what would you prefer to
    judge/evaluate/troubleshoot by? words or pictures with a little verbal
    enhancement? presently we have words alone, seems lame for 3D visual model
    advocates [worthathousand.com]).

    Mainly I envisioned this as a sheet metal part. 'Tabs' to me indicated
    flanges off the sides, parallel with a top/bottom surface. I mean, that is
    what a shelled box sounds like. And drafted sides? No biggy for sheet metal.
    Also, many tricky features in Pro/e benefit from surfacing. That difficult
    drafted, ribbed, flanged box turns to nothing with surfaces which will
    simply 'thicken', effortlessly. Haven't seen the design so can't say
    authoritatively, but I run into people all the time making impossible solid
    parts that should have been done, so much more simply, with surfacing.

    David Janes
     
    David Janes, Nov 3, 2006
    #3
  4. Sierevello

    graminator Guest

    David Janes wrote:>
    What he describes makes sense to me, and I wish I had such problems ;-)

    You want your features in the following order: 1. Box. 2 draft 3. Shell
    4. tabs. Use the inside edge of your box as the 4th side of your tab.
    As someone else said, it will disappear inside the solid.
     
    graminator, Nov 16, 2006
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.