Link To Thickness - tip

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by lee baz, Nov 27, 2007.

  1. lee baz

    lee baz Guest

    Hey y'all,

    Discovered a nice little thing the other day that I thought I'd share,
    some of you will no doubt already know and some of you may not:

    If you link a dimension value (such as the thickness of a shell) to
    the name 'thickness' then suddleny the tick-box appears in the boss
    extrude/cut dimension, as for sheet-metal.

    Also, linked values can be linked to in the document properties
    dialogue - I didn't know that either until the other day!

    Hope you're all having fun!

    Lee Bazalgette
    CSWP
     
    lee baz, Nov 27, 2007
    #1
  2. Another thought to go along with that is that you can have your part
    template set up with a variable called "thickness" and then you will always
    have that option without going through the link process.

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, Nov 27, 2007
    #2
  3. lee baz

    lee baz Guest

    Hi Wayne - thanks for that tip. However, when I try to write
    "thickness"=2 into the equations folder for a global variable, it says
    the equation is invalid. If I spell it "thicknes" it's ok - is that a
    big or something (2007 SP0)?
     
    lee baz, Nov 27, 2007
    #3
  4. Ok, here's what I have discovered. Apparently you can't directly type in
    "Thickness" as a variable since it appears that it's a reserved word for a
    linked value. So what you have to do is start a sheet metal part. This
    will insert the "Thickness" variable for you as a linked variable. Then
    double-click the thickness value in the graphics area and unlink it. Ctrl-Q
    to basically release that variable, delete all the sheet metal features and
    the sketch, and then save as a part template. The variable should still be
    there and valid. I have tried this in SW2006 & 2007, but not 2008.

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, Nov 27, 2007
    #4
  5. I don't know those answers. I remember Matt posting a study that in his
    instance, up to surface was a faster rebuild than through all. Probably
    because it only has to go so far and not look to see if anything is out
    there in space, which if true, then link to thickness might achieve the same
    benefit. I generally just use through all because then if faces change, I
    don't lose that reference. Sounds like some serious testing of this would
    be in order.

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, Nov 29, 2007
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.