Left Right Bent parts

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Brian, Dec 13, 2004.

  1. Brian

    Brian Guest

    I'm looking for best practice suggestions. I have many parts which
    start out as flats, and then are either bent up or down to create two
    different (left or right) versions. What is the best way to do this in
    SolidWorks?
     
    Brian, Dec 13, 2004
    #1
  2. Brian

    kenneth b Guest

    open, part to be mirrored
    select, appropriate plane
    insert, mirror part ...

    hth
     
    kenneth b, Dec 14, 2004
    #2
  3. Brian

    Tonius Guest

    If you're doing sketched bent, a rather simple way of doing
    left-right/up-down versions is to do two different configurations.
    Shetch two bent lines to opposite surfaces and use the other to bent,
    for example, downwards and the other upwards and suppress unnecessary
    bent from each configuration. You can also create two different edge
    flanges to opposite directions and suppress unnecessary one from the
    configurations.

    If you want those different versions to be independent models, Save As
    would be appropriate way to go. Just make the first model with the bent
    then save as the model with different name and in the new model change
    the properties to opposite direction.
    I won't recommend mirroring parts especially if you're working with PDM
    Works or such.
     
    Tonius, Dec 14, 2004
    #3
  4. Brian

    kenneth b Guest


    any particular reason as to why you don't recommend mirror parts with pdmw?
     
    kenneth b, Dec 14, 2004
    #4
  5. Brian

    That70sTick Guest

    To create a mirrored part in a separate file (SW2003 or later):
    1.) create new part
    2.) add original part using "Insert --> Part"
    3.) mirror inserted part body, do not merge bodies
    4.) use "Insert --> Feature --> Delete bodies" to delete original.

    Note that "delete bodies" is a feature. It does not delete the
    inserted part. The inserted part reappears if you roll back. The
    reference to the original part is "live". Try it and see.

    This scheme works for folks who need separate files for mirrored parts.
    Some PDM setups do not like multiple part numbers in a single file.
     
    That70sTick, Dec 14, 2004
    #5
  6. Brian

    kenneth b Guest


    what advantages does this method offer?
     
    kenneth b, Dec 15, 2004
    #6
  7. Brian

    That70sTick Guest

    No particular advantage. You still end up with a mirrored part.

    I am aware of situations where some folks wish to have an associative
    mirrored part in a separate part file. This accomplishes that task.
     
    That70sTick, Dec 15, 2004
    #7
  8. I think Kenneth means:

    Avantage against - insert / symetric part (not sure on the exact English
    menu)

    ?

    JM
     
    Jean Marc BRUN, Dec 15, 2004
    #8
  9. Brian

    That70sTick Guest

    Please excuse if you are getting multiple responses. I view the NG
    through Google (beta 2). Seems some things get lost...

    Anyhoo... My method is for SW2003 and earlier. Our SW2004 is still in
    the box. Plan to jump straight to 2005 when SP1 is out.

    I did get a chance to see SW2004 finally. There it is! So, if your
    using SW2004 or later, you don't need my advice.
     
    That70sTick, Dec 16, 2004
    #9
  10. Brian

    Cliff Guest

    Ummm .. do you have to migrate the parts thru SW2004 first? Or
    can SW205 deal with 2003 and earlier parts?
     
    Cliff, Dec 16, 2004
    #10
  11. Brian

    That70sTick Guest

    We'll find out soon, no?

    I've been able to open SW98 parts in SW2003, so I see no reason why not.
     
    That70sTick, Dec 16, 2004
    #11
  12. Brian

    kenneth b Guest

    Anyhoo... My method is for SW2003 and earlier. Our SW2004 is still in
    "Insert --> Part", did not exist prior to 2003.
     
    kenneth b, Dec 16, 2004
    #12
  13. Brian

    That70sTick Guest

    I guess that leaves SW2003 only.
     
    That70sTick, Dec 16, 2004
    #13
  14. As far as I recall, (SW97), I have been able to insert "base part", or
    "symetric part". (not sure about the English translation).
     
    Jean Marc BRUN, Dec 17, 2004
    #14
  15. Brian

    matt Guest

    It's been there for a good long time, as Brun said. It had different
    names, like Base Part or Derived Part.

    matt
     
    matt, Dec 17, 2004
    #15
  16. Brian

    kenneth b Guest

    It's been there for a good long time, as Brun said. It had different

    for some reason was thinking of multi-body, no idea how i got side tracked
     
    kenneth b, Dec 17, 2004
    #16
  17. Please call me Jean Marc, calling me Mr Brun makes me feel old ;=)))
     
    Jean Marc BRUN, Dec 17, 2004
    #17
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.