Lazy programmers?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by pete, Jul 17, 2005.

  1. pete

    pete Guest

    As I understand it, all of the help files are "registered" in the registry,
    So why can't the help file be a part of the SW upgrade package, instead of
    being a separate zip file?
    Is this lazy programming or is there a reasonable answer to this?
     
    pete, Jul 17, 2005
    #1
  2. I believe its done this way so a person can pick and choose which files they
    would like to download and/or install.If you,re on a slow connection you
    probably wouldn't want to download 120 megs of help info, 90 megs of
    shaders, and 60 megs of samples.Just to check out the new release. The
    shipped CDs will have everything on them as normal.

    Is this a reasonable answer?
     
    Rob Rodriguez, Jul 17, 2005
    #2
  3. Rob,

    I think he's talking about regular service packs, not pre-release or beta.

    I've often wondered the same thing.

    Mark
     
    Mark Mossberg, Jul 18, 2005
    #3
  4. The way they do it makes a whole lot of sense to me.

    We have machines set on a variety of service packs as I am a firm believer
    in if it's working just fine, leave it alone. So along comes SP4.0 and I
    want to grab it. I download the 4.0ev - 4.0 SP, the eDrawing update, and
    the 4.0 help file. But I also need the 0.0 - 4.0 SP update, the 1.1 - 4.0
    update, etc. Why would I want to re-download embedded identical help files
    several times? All it takes to install them is to unzip them to the
    SolidWorks2005 folder - no big deal at all.

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, Jul 18, 2005
    #4
  5. pete

    POH Guest

    There probably is the intent to allow a user with a slow internet
    connection to opt not to download the Help Files, for example.

    If the emphasis is on download efficiency, then the SolidWorks crew
    needs to do more to identify the versions of the available files so
    that time (especially for a slow connection) is not wasted by copying
    and installing updates which have already been applied.

    I don't understand why there can't be date stamp and version
    information listed alongside the file size. I've often downloaded and
    installed files which were flagged (as needed for the Service Pack
    Update) but contained nothing new...

    It should also be pointed out that, if a user is applying Service Packs
    incrementally (i.e. 0 to 1.0 to 2.0 to 3.0) then there's no need to
    apply the new Help Files or eDrawings updates until the most recent SP
    is patched.

    Per O. Hoel
    ____________________
     
    POH, Jul 19, 2005
    #5
  6. pete

    pete Guest

    Now here is a simple way of doing it, use the windows update method and
    then you could choose which files you want it to update and to what level!
    Seems simple to me, lol
     
    pete, Jul 19, 2005
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.