Layout Extraction

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by David Varghese, Nov 20, 2003.

  1. Hello,

    I am doing the layout of a schematic in Cadence that has vdda!, vssa!
    and gnda! terminals. While checking the nets connected in the
    extracted view of the cell it was observed that the drain and the
    source terminals of the nmos and pmos transistors are are not
    identified exactly as expected and hence the connections have been
    mixed up. So I am kinda stuck to find out what exactly would be the
    cause for this
    problem. Looks like the extraction routine does not identify the right
    potentials
    in the layout with vdda!, vssa! and gnda!.I suspect whether it has go
    to do anything with the design rules file. It might not have
    information regarding these terminals(vdda!,gnda!,vssa!), because I
    dont observe a similar problem when I tried out extracting layouts of
    other circuits which has just vdd and gnd. Has anybody come across a
    similar problem and has managed to troubleshoot it? Would be great if
    someone could
    help me in this matter.

    Regards,

    David :)
     
    David Varghese, Nov 20, 2003
    #1
  2. How do you expect the device recognition routines to determine source
    and drain? There is no layout difference.
     
    Edward J Kalenda, Nov 21, 2003
    #2
  3. David Varghese

    S. Badel Guest

    the extraction does not identify net names such
    as vdda! or vssa! or whatever, exept if you
    explicitely assign a name to a node by labelling
    it, and provided the tech files contains the code
    for doing it.
    remember the schematic and layout are not the
    same, they are designed separatedly and the
    connection between them is made through
    lvs. even if the net names are different in
    the extracted view and in the schematic, lvs will
    match them and report any errors.

    this is where the source and drain may be
    identified, that is, they are the same but
    the way they are connected to the rest
    of the circuit is different. in any other
    respect extractor or lvs don't care a nut
    about source and drain (you shouldn't either :)
    calling one terminal source and the other
    drain makes sense only in particular
    situations, where one is at a
    potential higher that the other.

    i suggest you run lvs and maybe discover
    errors in your layout. if you want to have
    specific net names in the extracted view
    use labels.

    stephane
     
    S. Badel, Nov 21, 2003
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.