Is there anyway to open and edit 2007 files using 2006

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by rkremser, Nov 14, 2006.

  1. rkremser

    Jason Guest

    I think you hit on it, most of us don't know how hard it is and how
    much could go wrong. Hell, sometimes going up to a new version results
    in feature failures. And many probably don't realize that some of the
    underlying code for a feature changes from release to release which is
    what causes these errors. Now imagine going back to a previous version
    or two and the feature no longer has the code that made it work in the
    first place. Perhaps it works and doesn't error but gives you different
    geometry, it happens sometimes going forward, gonig back will be worse.
    I would be scared to trust the model that's been saved back.

    I do see two ways that may it could work on a smaller scale.

    1. The file was simply saved in the new format but no update was
    perform so everything should be as it was for saving back.

    2. Save as an older version results in a dumb solid but maintains
    internal id, face, plane, & axis names such that the model can work
    with assemblies and not lose mates. I think this approach is a more
    reasonable request and easier to program.
     
    Jason, Nov 17, 2006
    #21
  2. rkremser

    John H Guest

    Solidworks has chosen that models will just automatically update when opened
    in a new version, and I'm sure this includes using new algorithms if the
    code for a feature has been rewritten.
    This is not the way that all CAD vendors do it.
    I-DEAS will continue to rebuild your models using the old algorithms, until
    you explicitly choose to "migrate" each individual feature, and gives you
    some tools to indicate whether this is likely to give you a problem or not.

    I think the reason I-DEAS was made to work that way is that it has always
    been used to make the most complex types of solid and surface models
    possible, and so the likelihood of a rebuild failure is higher than for
    simple prismatic geometry.
    In contrast, SWX has traditionally only been used to construct simple
    geometry, and it's only relatively recently that it has started adding
    surfacing tools to construct more complex forms.

    Maybe it's time for SWX to give more control over what gets updated under
    new versions of software.

    John H
     
    John H, Nov 20, 2006
    #22
  3. rkremser

    Jason Guest

    It seems they do some of both. I've had mates that error out
    (over-define) on a new version and can't be fixed....recreating the
    exact same mate then fixes the problem. In this cases it looks like a
    bad combination of the old mates code and the mate solver. Apparent the
    mate type's code change and thus the newer code works.

    When you open a part, it does so without errors. However, on a Forced
    Rebuild, the errors show up. Same thing, rebuild the feature will often
    fix it. So it appears that each feature has its own code, then there
    are the solvers and geometry checkers and while some change and others
    don't, certain combinations of the two throw up errors.
     
    Jason, Nov 20, 2006
    #23
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.