Help on writing a nesting macro

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Pete, Feb 21, 2006.

  1. Pete

    Pete Guest

    I don't know if this is possible, but I am planning to write a SW macro
    to nest shapes for 'pastry' cutter tools for labels. I should add, I
    have little knowledge of macro writing.
    I am aware that there is propietry software available, but our useage
    would not bear the cost.
    Can anyone help to put my foot on the first step, or steps if possible?


    Thanks

    Pete Nichols
     
    Pete, Feb 21, 2006
    #1
  2. Pete

    TOP Guest

    What kind of budget do you have to this? I mean for your time?
     
    TOP, Feb 21, 2006
    #2
  3. Pete

    Pete Guest

    It will probably be a 'when and able' task, slotting it in when time
    allows.
     
    Pete, Feb 21, 2006
    #3
  4. Pete

    lcifers Guest

    Pete,

    I would suggest looking for an off-the-shelf solution. There are some
    low end 2D nesting applications for less than $1K, and developing an
    algorithim yourself (particularly with little macro writing knowledge)
    will end up costing many times more than this of your time. It's
    difficult to do.

    You might want to have a look at the following links. I have used none
    of these, so I cant vouch for their performance. But the prices are
    very low. If you are unable to bear the cost of these applications, you
    will certainly be unable to bear the cost of developing something
    yourself. Good luck, and let us know how the demos look if you try any
    of them.

    http://www.nirvanatec.com/plus2d_nesting_software.html
    http://www.cutmaster2d.com/order.html
    http://www.optimizecutter.com/purchase-cutting-software.html

    Regards,

    - Luther
     
    lcifers, Feb 21, 2006
    #4
  5. Pete

    Brian Guest

    It also depends on the type of nesting that you are doing. If you are
    cutting many sheets of expensive material, in the same pattern, a human
    being will almost always produce a better nest, utilizing less material,
    than even the most expensive programs. I recently spent nearly a week
    nesting some parts to be cut from fabric and tape via a laser (only 2
    different nests). I also sent the same parts to all of the nesting software
    places I could find that looked like they may have a shot at doing better
    ( about 6 firms ). The closest utilized 20% less material than I did. At
    the cost of the material savings, I could have spent a month nesting the
    parts, and still come out ahead, although after a week, my sanity was fading
    quickly.

    If your material is not expensive and have to do many different layouts,
    but can't justify much investment, you might take a look at this software.
    samtechindia.com. Their demo software is semi-funtional ( limited to 3
    shapes I believe, and possibly the # of degrees of rotation that it'll
    check). Howver, it does export a .dxf, and is free.... free is good.
     
    Brian, Feb 21, 2006
    #5
  6. Pete

    TOP Guest

    Pete,

    Brian is right, humans tend to do this better. When I do parts that are
    intended to nest I will generally create and assembly with a sheet of
    whatever and nest my parts as I go. Sometimes I will make design
    decisions based on whether the parts will nest. In other words the part
    is designed to fulfill its purpose and nest simultaneously. No nesting
    program can do this.
     
    TOP, Feb 21, 2006
    #6
  7. Pete

    slohcin Guest

    Thanks guys for your input. I am going to take your advice and opt for
    the manual method. Thinking about it the time put in to writing, and
    debugging, a macro would never have been recouped.

    Thanks again

    (Posting from home as I now have a couple of days off.)

    Pete
     
    slohcin, Feb 21, 2006
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.