Help: AC Analysis

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by mxkdirs, Oct 24, 2005.

  1. mxkdirs

    mxkdirs Guest

    I'm running ac analysis (from 1GHz to 5GHz) on a single NMOS but I'm
    getting weird results. The schematic is setup as:

    The drain is connected to a 2.2 V dc source for biasing and the gate is
    connected to a 1.8V dc source for biasing also. Then, I just drive the
    gate with ac magnitude = 1 V sin signal. I didn't want to do resistive
    network for gate biasing because that's not the main issue. It's
    sufficient for me to just place dc sources at the gate and drain. In
    fact, biasing on a certain point is not important right now--it just
    needs to be biased. Now, I run this circuit and I get very weird
    results. For example, I was calculating input impedance at the gate
    (Vi/Ii) and it came out too be way bigger than my hand calculations;
    plus, the output signal didn't seem right among other things. I am
    thinking something might be wrong with my dc/ac blocks. Please look at
    my schematic and see if someone can spot a problem:
    http://www.geocities.com/mxkdirs/acfet.html

    I know I would need dc blocking caps to block dc signal but I'm not
    sure if I need ac blocking inductors to block dc sources. And here
    where my confusion is: if I block dc signal then my circuit might not
    be biased because I'm running ac analysis from 1GHz to 5GHz. Thank
    you.

    Mike
     
    mxkdirs, Oct 24, 2005
    #1
  2. mxkdirs

    sheldonbrand Guest

    Mike,

    The setup appears to be correct. Yes, you need the
    inductors to isolate the dc bias source for ac analysis.
    One other option you could use in this case is Spectre's
    analysis dependent switches. The switches allow you to
    connect and disconnect elements based on the analysis
    you are running. Could you provide some information on
    the output signal you are seeing? Also are you calculating
    the input impedance at dc or for the ac frequency range?
    Shouldn't the dc impedance be pretty high? Are you using
    hand calculated values for the calculation or are you using
    the small signal parameters from the sumulator's dc operating
    point calculation? In general, using the small signal parameters
    from the dc operating points gives better correlation. There
    are many second order effects that are difficult to include in
    hand calculations.

    Best Regards,

    Brand Sheldon
     
    sheldonbrand, Oct 29, 2005
    #2
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.