Group command - LT vs AutoCAD

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by Matthew Taylor, Feb 23, 2004.

  1. In AutoCAD, the Group command has always seemed like a comand that could
    potentialy be very useful, but is let down by an awkward user interface
    IMHO.

    Anyway, some time ago (about 2000) a friend who used LT pointed out to
    me that the user interface for the group command was completely
    different in LT - in many ways it was the kind of way that I had always
    wanted the group command to work in AutoCAD.
    At the time I queried this, & people were of the opinion that
    modifications might be tested or introduced in LT, but then would
    generaly be added to the next version of AutoCAD.
    I forgot about this for a while, but was reminded again last week when
    sitting next to someone using LT.
    The command still works the same in the latest LT as it always has done
    in LT & it is simple to create & manipulate unnamed groups. In AutoCAD
    2004 though it is still the awkward interface that it always has had in
    the full version of AutoCAD.

    Why?

    I thought that the point of LT was that it was AutoCAD with some of the
    features removed - but in this instance, it is instead a feature that
    just works differently between the programs.

    Is there any easy way to get it to work in 2004 like it does in LT?
     
    Matthew Taylor, Feb 23, 2004
    #1
  2. Hi Matthew,

    I completey agree that this makes no sense. I personally have a very
    similar issue with the LT version of PURGE which completely,
    absolutely outperforms the autocad purge command. The LT version let
    you do nested (or not) purge, has a great graphical interface and is
    ultra easy to use. The autocad version is not as nice, in my mind.
    This might have changed in current versions, but the awesome purge
    dialogue for LT was implemented in 1998 as I recall an I have not yet
    seen it in AutoCAD.

    I think that anyone who had used the LT graphical purge would probably
    agree that it works better (and no, I'm not an anti-command line
    advocate, but the graphical version in LT works so much better).

    This makes no sense to me either - your Groups observation is along
    the same line.

    Regards,

    SMA
     
    Sean-Michael Adams, Feb 24, 2004
    #2
  3. A graphical purge was added in 2000i - I have never seen the one in LT
    though, so couldn't comment if it is the same one or not.

    I'd have imagined though as there is so much shared code between the
    programs, moving it across once it is in LT ought to be very simple - it
    is almost as though they forgot.
     
    Matthew Taylor, Feb 27, 2004
    #3

  4. Great. At least this one made it. My work version is autocad 2000,
    which we have not bothered to upgrade yet due to finances and it's
    mostly for legacy data.

    I do recall waiting for a couple years and being baffled as to why the
    graphical purge had not been integrated.

    Thanks for the information,

    SMA
     
    Sean-Michael Adams, Mar 1, 2004
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.