Got Autocad LT, wish it was full...

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by Buzzy, Dec 20, 2004.

  1. Buzzy

    Buzzy Guest

    The boss man just sprang for LT 2005, and I wish he coulda afforded the Big
    Game.

    I am trying to convert a pencil-and-tee square operation to CAAD,
    specifically to create/ share dwgs of gas processing equipment (structural
    steel, pipe fittings, vessels, P&ID's, etc). I am beginning to learn that a
    lot of 3d party stuff won't work with this version; I guess I'll have to
    create a library of parts manually.

    Can a guy find this sort of stuff on the Net-? I set about building some
    screwed fittings a couple of hours ago and it has made me insane.

    Too much coffeeeeeee

    Buzzy
     
    Buzzy, Dec 20, 2004
    #1
  2. Buzzy

    Paul Turvill Guest

    If the boss man will spring for just a bit more, have a look at the LISP
    enabler and other goodies at
    http://www.drcauto.com
    ___
     
    Paul Turvill, Dec 21, 2004
    #2
  3. Buzzy

    Marc Clamage Guest

    I thought LT didn't handle 3D. I know there's software out there to "extend"
    LT so it acts like the full version. I also know AutoDesk is going after
    those programs hammer and tongs to prevent them from getting around the
    limitations. Good luck.

    Marc
     
    Marc Clamage, Dec 21, 2004
    #3
  4. Buzzy

    Paul Turvill Guest

    In that it handles X, Y, *and* Z coordinates and has a fully customizable
    UCS, LT handles 3D very well, thank you. What it does NOT do is solid
    modeling; there's a significant difference.

    And "going after" the third party add-on vendors doesn't mean they'll be
    able to stop them any time soon.
    ___
     
    Paul Turvill, Dec 21, 2004
    #4
  5. Buzzy

    CW Guest

    Autocad LT doesn't handle 3d and full Autocad doesn't handle 3D well. If 3d
    is what you want, go for something different.
     
    CW, Dec 22, 2004
    #5
  6. Buzzy

    Marc Clamage Guest

    I make my living doing 3D in AutoCAD!

    www.emasary.com

    I use Accurender, by the way. Approximately 15,000,000,000 easier to use
    than and 1/5th the cost of 3D Studio, has an extensive plant library, runs
    right out of AutoCAD and has an excellent NG (at news.mcneel.com) and
    support website (Accustudio.com).

    Marc
     
    Marc Clamage, Dec 22, 2004
    #6
  7. Buzzy

    CW Guest

    There are still people mining with pick and shovel too. I wouldn't do it.
     
    CW, Dec 22, 2004
    #7
  8. Buzzy

    Marc Clamage Guest

    So what do you use, CW?

    Marc

     
    Marc Clamage, Dec 22, 2004
    #8
  9. Buzzy

    CW Guest

    Turbocad. Been messing with Rhino a bit lately. Used Inventor for a time.
    That was good.
     
    CW, Dec 22, 2004
    #9
  10. Buzzy

    Kirk Bennett Guest

    TurboCRAP, er TurboCAD.....Bahhhhh ahhhh Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!
     
    Kirk Bennett, Jan 13, 2005
    #10
  11. Buzzy

    CW Guest

    I have to hand it to you. It takes real balls to get on a worldwide
    newsgroup and show your ignorence in such a way.
     
    CW, Jan 14, 2005
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.